<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/575301</link>
		<description>Comments by Don Gilbert</description>
<item>
<title>Wikeloogle : New Theme Alert</title>
<link>http://wikeloogle.com/2011/03/28/theme-alert/#IDComment138339803</link>
<description>I like.... very much! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wikeloogle.com/2011/03/28/theme-alert/#IDComment138339803</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.matamko.com/ : Our First Blog Post in Matamko.com - Matamko.com Blog</title>
<link>http://www.matamko.com/index.php?option=com_easyblog&amp;view=entry&amp;id=2&amp;Itemid=103#IDComment128467961</link>
<description>Very true - I am very familiar with Google and Facebook looking at entering this realm.  Can&amp;#039;t wait to see what&amp;#039;s coming down the pike for social buying, especially EnMasse. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.matamko.com/index.php?option=com_easyblog&amp;view=entry&amp;id=2&amp;Itemid=103#IDComment128467961</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.matamko.com/ : Exciting Times Ahead - Matamko.com Social Buying / Group Buying Blog</title>
<link>http://www.matamko.com/index.php?option=com_easyblog&amp;view=entry&amp;id=3&amp;Itemid=103#IDComment128467368</link>
<description>Really? What kind of information is contained in this paperwork? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.matamko.com/index.php?option=com_easyblog&amp;view=entry&amp;id=3&amp;Itemid=103#IDComment128467368</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : yk0pn1</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1718400992#IDComment114616018</link>
<description>I wouldn&amp;#039;t - because every restore effort will FAIL if you even have Wi-Fi Sync installed on the computer. (Even if your not using it and have your phone connected via usb.) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Dec 2010 03:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1718400992#IDComment114616018</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : yk0pn1</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1718400992#IDComment112497840</link>
<description>Same situation here - I just restored to official 4.2.1 and am waiting for new redsn0w. I didn&amp;#039;t lose anything, since I just redsn0w&amp;#039;ed earlier today, trying to get ready for the new ultrasn0w. I guess the joke was on me. lol </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1718400992#IDComment112497840</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : yk0pn1</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1718400992#IDComment112497464</link>
<description>You don&amp;#039;t need to - simply use PT to update to a custom 4.2.1 ipsw that doesn&amp;#039;t update the baseband (if you are on a 3G). If you are on an old bootrom 3Gs, ask MN for the bundle that will allow you use new PT to update to 4.2.1 (like he says here - &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/MuscleNerd/status/8996615176060928)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/MuscleNerd/status/899661517606...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1718400992#IDComment112497464</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : yk0pn1</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1718400992#IDComment112497213</link>
<description>Stop telling people to update to official 4.2 if they are already on an exploitable BB. They need to just use PT and iTunes to update to custom ipsw that doesn&amp;#039;t update BB. No need to update to iPad BB if they are already using Ultrasn0w. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1718400992#IDComment112497213</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : efqj1p</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111343357</link>
<description>And that&amp;#039;s what&amp;#039;s most frustrating. It&amp;#039;s like a teardrop of sensibility in an ocean of insanity. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111343357</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : ;bcsi-ac-1167ACFE98C9ECAB=1C059092000005038XeyLG0jMiIMTkyvWGZrskO5LBOLAwAAAwUAAJ2CPwAIBwAAgAEAAHhqCQ</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1652053923#IDComment111342792</link>
<description>Once again I ask - Why do unlockers have to stay away from this update?  If this update kills the unlock / patches the exploit used for 4.1, why did are we still waiting on the unlock for 4.1? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1652053923#IDComment111342792</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : efqj1p</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111342055</link>
<description>Thanks - I was hoping that would make sense to someone. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111342055</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : efqj1p</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111337743</link>
<description>Where did you get the info that new BB doesn&amp;#039;t patch security holes? If that&amp;#039;s the case, why is MN and everyone else telling unlockers to stay away? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111337743</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : efqj1p</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111337336</link>
<description>So, why all this posting about ultrasn0w unlockers stay far far away from 4.2 / 4.2.1? I realize that this release updates the baseband, but if the upcoming baseband wasn&amp;#039;t able to be unlocked using the method for 4.1, why are we still waiting for the unlock for 4.1? The other option is that 4.2 / 4.2.1 IS unlockable using the same method as 4.1, in which case it doesn&amp;#039;t matter if we DO update (not counting the tethered JB - which I don&amp;#039;t have to deal with anyway, since my 3Gs BR is xx937xxxxx) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111337336</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : efqj1p</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111295211</link>
<description>hilarious! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment111295211</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : efqj1p</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment109966313</link>
<description>Oh ya, and they are going to announce Live Streaming music service. :) Check my blog for proof. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment109966313</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : efqj1p</title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment109963583</link>
<description>Not necessarily - how long did Apple have the 24K pwn exploit before the 3Gs was released and they still didn&amp;#039;t fix it? I think it was somewhere around 3 months. So, IF Apple is releasing 4.2 tomorrow, I highly doubt they would or even could fix it if it was released today. BUT, the unknown still remains - what is Apple actually doing tomorrow. I guess we wait and see. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/1452044444#IDComment109963583</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Magento Themes : 8 Don’ts For htaccess</title>
<link>http://www.cyberdesignz.com/blog/web-development/8-donts-of-htaccess/#IDComment51114686</link>
<description>Good stuff here - some of it seems simple - but you have no idea how many times I killed a site by forgetting to comment out my comments. lol</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cyberdesignz.com/blog/web-development/8-donts-of-htaccess/#IDComment51114686</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : Business Card Giveaway!</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/business-card-giveaway/#IDComment51025171</link>
<description>So - I meant to comment with my intensedebate profile - oops. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/business-card-giveaway/#IDComment51025171</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : </title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/131932341#IDComment25927057</link>
<description>Your taking a risk there. Because Apple may find this hole by themselves, and fix it by the time the jailbreak is released, so when you buy a 3GS, your screwed and can&amp;#039;t jailbreak it. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/131932341#IDComment25927057</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : </title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/131932341#IDComment25901870</link>
<description>has anyone ever tried to hack Apple&amp;#039;s servers and find the tools they use? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/131932341#IDComment25901870</guid>
</item><item>
<title>blog.iphone-dev.org : </title>
<link>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/131932341#IDComment25901403</link>
<description>my thoughts exactly. I think Apple may even leave holes/vulns open for this very reason. but what do i know? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.iphone-dev.org/post/131932341#IDComment25901403</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>