<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/574848</link>
		<description>Comments by detmar</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Dislike Obama? You must be racist.</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/#IDComment35953695</link>
<description>read Detmar above, and follow the instructions to the letter </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/#IDComment35953695</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Dislike Obama? You must be racist.</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/#IDComment35824396</link>
<description>For those who hammer this piece, please, please don&amp;#039;t despair, help is at hand. Here what you should do. Find  a large pool of deep water, tie a stone to your feet, and jump in. Trust me, it will help. Both you personally, and the mankind&amp;#039;s DNA as well. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/24/dislike-obama-you-must-be-racist/#IDComment35824396</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Your family is being watched 24-7</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/#IDComment33155140</link>
<description>In the old England no cameras were needed because miscreants got punished. Punished in a sense that it hurt. In today&amp;#039;s Britain you can get away with murder without an effective punishment, and many do. Listen to this. In a TV program, the crew followed a young man who shot dead a farther of two. The shooting got captured on a CCTV, and the man was apprehended within hours. The TV crew filmed him facing the duty sergeant reading him his rights in a police station. The young man yawned. And why not. Charged with murder that he readily admitted to he couldn&amp;#039;t get &amp;#039;life&amp;#039; (in pseudo-liberal Britain life equals 25 years max), but only half of the maximum ie 12 years. Well, he only got 8 years because of mitigating circumstances, and should be out on parole having served just 4 years. Four years in a modern British prison where inmates are served better meals than the NHS patients. That&amp;#039;s what a switch from retributive to restorative justice does. It restores the villains to crime in no time at all.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Sep 2009 18:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/03/your-family-is-being-watched-24-7/#IDComment33155140</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Do you notice anything shrivelling?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/27/do-you-notice-anything-shrivelling/#IDComment32810028</link>
<description>Columns of this quality should be syndicated globally. The freaks are nothing but attention seeking non-entities. I often wonder what they become when they hit an old age. Mark, U R by far the best, and your writing makes me think and laugh at the same time. Just take great care. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/08/27/do-you-notice-anything-shrivelling/#IDComment32810028</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : One flap of a Butterfly’s wings . . .</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/23/one-flap-of-a-butterfly&rsquo;s-wings/#IDComment28393429</link>
<description>You read the wrong column. Try the kids corner, it may help. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/23/one-flap-of-a-butterfly&rsquo;s-wings/#IDComment28393429</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : One flap of a Butterfly’s wings . . .</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/23/one-flap-of-a-butterfly&rsquo;s-wings/#IDComment28393248</link>
<description>Jack Mitchell:  No, he isn&amp;#039;t. You&amp;#039;re wrong once more. Look, your impairment does seem worse than I thought. Try and seek help, or you would end your days sucking your toe. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 06:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/23/one-flap-of-a-butterfly&rsquo;s-wings/#IDComment28393248</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : One flap of a Butterfly’s wings . . .</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/23/one-flap-of-a-butterfly&rsquo;s-wings/#IDComment28245663</link>
<description>Jack Mitchell:  I&amp;rsquo;m setting up a small travelling troupe of individuals with psychotic disorders to demonstrate to the public at large the seriousness of the condition. Sadly, the most promising contender for a place, a man who exhibited remarkably well the debilitating effects of hallucinations, delusional beliefs, irrational thinking, and disjointed social interaction (both verbally and in a written form) has passed away recently. Any chance that you would volunteer to replace him?   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/07/23/one-flap-of-a-butterfly&rsquo;s-wings/#IDComment28245663</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Mark Steyn on why the fascists are winning in Europe</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/18/why-the-fascists-are-winning-in-europe/#IDComment24740919</link>
<description>For the Cynics &amp;amp; Co: wrong on the numbers, and wrong on the demise of the BNP in the UK. Sadly, the party seems to reflect, or at least be close to the views of many on immigration, the law and order, and Europe. Check the polls, or read a piece by Mark&amp;#039;s former Spectator colleague here. It&amp;#039;s wort it.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/features/3689038/part_5/if-anything-this-result-understates-the-support-for-the-bnp.thtml#comments&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-magazine/features/...&lt;/a&gt;   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/18/why-the-fascists-are-winning-in-europe/#IDComment24740919</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>