<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/509014</link>
		<description>Comments by deluxo</description>
<item>
<title>/Film : Michael Cera Has No Interest In Ghostbusters 3, Jack Black Would Bust Ghosts If He Could</title>
<link>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/17/michael-cera-has-no-interest-in-ghostbusters-3-jack-black-would-bust-ghosts-if-he-could/#IDComment24590159</link>
<description>I could see Black being the new Ray Stantz -esque character.  Also, the exposition heavy scientist route might chill the crazy man persona.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http:/www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/17/michael-cera-has-no-interest-in-ghostbusters-3-jack-black-would-bust-ghosts-if-he-could/#IDComment24590159</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : This Week in DVD: Friday the 13th, Transformers (Season 1), and More</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/16/this-week-in-dvd-friday-the-13th-transformers-season-1-and-more/#IDComment24508673</link>
<description>maybe she&amp;#039;ll give birth to a mutated fetus due to her old age and they&amp;#039;ll title it &amp;quot;Creature from the Black Madea&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/16/this-week-in-dvd-friday-the-13th-transformers-season-1-and-more/#IDComment24508673</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Tony Scott&#039;s Warriors Remake To Be Set In LA</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/03/tony-scotts-warriors-remake-to-be-set-in-la/#IDComment23239780</link>
<description>&amp;quot;a study of gang culture in LA today&amp;quot;?  so, not only do we lose the character of NYC but also the wacky gang identities as well?  i don&amp;#039;t want to see Crips and Bloods.  i want baseball furies and lizzies.  i want personality.  i want the original film.  and i don&amp;#039;t want tony scott&amp;#039;s pink jogging shorts anywhere near The Warriors </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/06/03/tony-scotts-warriors-remake-to-be-set-in-la/#IDComment23239780</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Jonathan Glazer&#039;s Next Sexy Beast Wants to Get Under The Skin</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/19/jonathan-glazers-next-sexy-beast-wants-to-get-under-the-skin/#IDComment21843023</link>
<description>i guess Rubber Johnny and Flex are the closest we&amp;#039;ll get to Cunningham films. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/19/jonathan-glazers-next-sexy-beast-wants-to-get-under-the-skin/#IDComment21843023</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Jonathan Glazer&#039;s Next Sexy Beast Wants to Get Under The Skin</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/19/jonathan-glazers-next-sexy-beast-wants-to-get-under-the-skin/#IDComment21842330</link>
<description>was it cunningham&amp;#039;s fault though?  or studio involvement?  i was under the impression that the studio&amp;#039;s pushiness on a proposed &amp;#039;Neuromancer&amp;#039; project is what made him leave that film, and movie-making altogether. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/19/jonathan-glazers-next-sexy-beast-wants-to-get-under-the-skin/#IDComment21842330</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Jonathan Glazer&#039;s Next Sexy Beast Wants to Get Under The Skin</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/19/jonathan-glazers-next-sexy-beast-wants-to-get-under-the-skin/#IDComment21841841</link>
<description>great news!!!  it&amp;#039;s been far too long since Birth.  Glazer is such a skilled and singular filmmaker that I think anytime he&amp;#039;s willing to tell a story is a good time to get his projects fast-tracked.    he&amp;#039;s what chris cunningham could&amp;#039;ve been to films is he ever got the chance to make one. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/19/jonathan-glazers-next-sexy-beast-wants-to-get-under-the-skin/#IDComment21841841</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Angels &amp; Demons - What Did You Think?</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/angels-demons-what-did-you-think/#IDComment21667321</link>
<description>i agree wholeheartedly about A&amp;amp;D being far better than Da Vinci Code.  Though, that said, it still isn&amp;#039;t any good.  There were a few solid suspense sequences but overall it was like watching someone cook a meal with no enthusiasm.    now i pre-heat the oven.  now i chop the onions.  now i cut the steak.  see how entertaining this is!  like that.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 23:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/angels-demons-what-did-you-think/#IDComment21667321</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Inglourious Basterds Soundtrack Listing</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21559110</link>
<description>i wonder if the Bowie could possibly be an instrumental cover --indicative of the WWII period?  Maybe like a brass version of it, or possibly one sung in French or German?   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21559110</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Inglourious Basterds Soundtrack Listing</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21551963</link>
<description>DShelton--  agree 110%  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21551963</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Inglourious Basterds Soundtrack Listing</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21551194</link>
<description>maybe i should gay it up for the malick fans:  wee!  lost world!  pocahontas!  you go girl! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21551194</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Inglourious Basterds Soundtrack Listing</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21549668</link>
<description>i would think it&amp;#039;s quite the other way around.  it&amp;#039;s considered cool to hate on tarantino and so very hipster-y to be contrarian.  and FYI, &amp;quot;Malick&amp;quot; (as in Terrance) is a director who i see as total d-bag hipster bait. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21549668</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Inglourious Basterds Soundtrack Listing</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21542936</link>
<description>Ennio Morricone...  Ennio Morricone....  and David Bowie&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;Cat People!&amp;quot;  where?  how?  uh.... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/inglourious-basterds-soundtrack-listing/#IDComment21542936</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Rob Zombie Interview Part 2</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/rob-zombie-interview-part-2-h2-halloween-2-tyrannosaurus-rex-el-superbeasto-and-dumb-teens/#IDComment21521572</link>
<description>thanks for this, hunter.  this entire piece on zombie (including the platinum dunes piece) has been a great read.  looking forward to H2.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/15/rob-zombie-interview-part-2-h2-halloween-2-tyrannosaurus-rex-el-superbeasto-and-dumb-teens/#IDComment21521572</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Francis Ford Coppola&#039;s Tetro Movie Trailer</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/02/francis-ford-coppolas-tetro-movie-trailer/#IDComment20514556</link>
<description>just made my must-see list. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 May 2009 20:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/02/francis-ford-coppolas-tetro-movie-trailer/#IDComment20514556</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Page 2</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/22/page-2-53/#IDComment19641602</link>
<description>i hope dunst does NOT come back.  I would tell her, &amp;#039;look, take some time off, make your Debbie Harry movie, but please --for the love of god, woman-- leave spider-man alone.  haven&amp;#039;t you done enough?  haven&amp;#039;t you done enough harm?!  better yet, just leave altogether, kirsten.  leave the country.&amp;#039; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/22/page-2-53/#IDComment19641602</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Page 2</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/page-2-52/#IDComment19566070</link>
<description>i agree with you --it does squarely come down to the story.  but, in my opinion, Apatow&amp;#039;s longer run times take away from the film&amp;#039;s entertainment value for me.  and don&amp;#039;t get me wrong, i love long films --so long as the story and the atmosphere can support that length of time.  but with apatow --a filmmaker so apt at improv and situation-- the longer those scenes roll on, it goes from being fresh and funny and feeling off the cuff to feeling tiresome and padded for no reason other than not having an editorial eye for when to punctuate a scene.    take freaks and geeks -- apatow&amp;#039;s genius writing is fully served by both the entertainment value and the run time.  the jokes go on only as long as they have to.  the scenes feel fresh and leave me wanting more from the characters.  and the results, in my opinion, are far more skilled than his 3 hour knocked up director&amp;#039;s cut. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/page-2-52/#IDComment19566070</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Page 2</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/page-2-52/#IDComment19562891</link>
<description>not other comedically-driven filmmakers.  and the 2 and halfhour plus films have only really resurged in genre films and event films as of late.  before that, you would&amp;#039;nt have seen a dramedy that was over 100 minutes. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/page-2-52/#IDComment19562891</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Page 2</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/page-2-52/#IDComment19561855</link>
<description>but still AWESOME.    not defending a CSI movie by the way.  just pointing out the greatness of the Simpsons movie. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/page-2-52/#IDComment19561855</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Page 2</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/page-2-52/#IDComment19555682</link>
<description>yeah, but apatow is so freakin&amp;#039; self-indulgent with his run times that it nearly kills the overall tone of his work.  comedy isn&amp;#039;t supposed to be laborious.  he should just stick to 2 hours and under. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/page-2-52/#IDComment19555682</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : LOL: Snakes on a Plane - The Television Edit</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/20/lol-snakes-on-a-plane-the-television-edit/#IDComment19487889</link>
<description>Hand me my wallet.  Which one&amp;#039;s yours?  It&amp;#039;s the one that says Bad Monday to Friday. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/20/lol-snakes-on-a-plane-the-television-edit/#IDComment19487889</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>