en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/687489 Comments by dbehsman http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/11/13/how-to-survive-communist-induced-famine-really-introducing-the-cultural-revolution-cookbook/#IDComment221720899 That has to be the post of the day! Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:58:13 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2011/11/13/how-to-survive-communist-induced-famine-really-introducing-the-cultural-revolution-cookbook/#IDComment221720899 http://bigjournalism.com/mchastain/2011/11/12/bloomberg-ignores-multiple-scandals-of-the-obama-administration/#IDComment221074315 It's because they have no conscience. They only have agenda. They have no sense of truth or justice. They don't want to be bothered with such niceties. They only have an agenda. Morality doesn't exist to them (unless they themselves are victims). They only have agenda. So, why isn't the establishment G.O.P. going after them? Why aren't we looking at (for example) the copyright laws? We could lower the length of the copyright down to 10 years. And why is it that a copyright only costs $25? Since the demonic liberals proclaim their love of progressive tax codes, why don't we institute a progressive fee for copyright? When someone gets caught file sharing, make the fine only the cost of the product itself, or better yet legalize file sharing! That's just for starters. Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:37:13 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/mchastain/2011/11/12/bloomberg-ignores-multiple-scandals-of-the-obama-administration/#IDComment221074315 http://bigjournalism.com/jhoft/2011/07/10/libs-outraged-over-paul-ryans-350-bottle-of-wine-silent-when-nancy-pelosi-drowned-101000-of-booze-on-pelosi-one/#IDComment172063848 These "professors" are real humanitarians, aren't they? They economically RAPE 18 to 22 year old young adults under the false pretense that their worthless degree will be actually worth something when they're done. Many of them are scum of the earth. Look at how some of these professors try to wheedle out a bit more money from these kids with the college textbook scam. Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:49:25 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/jhoft/2011/07/10/libs-outraged-over-paul-ryans-350-bottle-of-wine-silent-when-nancy-pelosi-drowned-101000-of-booze-on-pelosi-one/#IDComment172063848 http://bigjournalism.com/jhoft/2011/07/10/libs-outraged-over-paul-ryans-350-bottle-of-wine-silent-when-nancy-pelosi-drowned-101000-of-booze-on-pelosi-one/#IDComment172020188 These "professors" are real humanitarians, aren't they? They economically RAPE 18 to 22 year old young adults under the false pretense that their worthless degree will be actually worth something when they're done. Many of them are scum of the earth. Look at how some of these professors try to wheedle out a bit more money from these kids with the college textbook scam. Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:19:23 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/jhoft/2011/07/10/libs-outraged-over-paul-ryans-350-bottle-of-wine-silent-when-nancy-pelosi-drowned-101000-of-booze-on-pelosi-one/#IDComment172020188 http://bigjournalism.com/jhoft/2011/07/10/libs-outraged-over-paul-ryans-350-bottle-of-wine-silent-when-nancy-pelosi-drowned-101000-of-booze-on-pelosi-one/#IDComment172018869 She deserves it. Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:15:18 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/jhoft/2011/07/10/libs-outraged-over-paul-ryans-350-bottle-of-wine-silent-when-nancy-pelosi-drowned-101000-of-booze-on-pelosi-one/#IDComment172018869 http://bigjournalism.com/jhoft/2011/07/10/libs-outraged-over-paul-ryans-350-bottle-of-wine-silent-when-nancy-pelosi-drowned-101000-of-booze-on-pelosi-one/#IDComment172004913 I think this is a perfect example of the mindset of the demonic left. They get outraged when someone spends their own money, yet shrug when one of their own spends other people's money. Pathetic creatures. Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:42:05 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/jhoft/2011/07/10/libs-outraged-over-paul-ryans-350-bottle-of-wine-silent-when-nancy-pelosi-drowned-101000-of-booze-on-pelosi-one/#IDComment172004913 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168037093 "Once again you are changing the words to suit YOUR little realm of thought." WHAT ON EARTH ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, YOU BLITHERING IDIOT?!?!? "As I said, they are being denied the right to marry the person they love, whether that be a man or a woman, provided the other person agrees." Once again, that's not true. Any homosexual man can marry any homosexual woman, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any homosexual man, provided that he agrees. How have they been denied any rights? "But, as you are incapable of logical or coherent thought, discussing this with you is an exercise in futility." You cannot answer a simple question, because you are an intellectual coward. "No you have not won the debate, because you cannot answer the simple question." Well, this is the first time I've heard the question from you, so let's not jump to conclusions. "Why is it wrong, from a governmental stand point, for two men or two women to unite in marriage?" Marriage has ALWAYS been defined as between a man and a woman. Sometimes, it has been defined as between a man and multiple women. Sometimes it has been defined as between a man and under aged girls. What's next? People marrying animals? Themselves? The dead? "All other views aside, this is about the government deciding what the people are allowed to do." All other views aside, this is about government changing the definition of a word to score some political points. "Good Day, I hope some day you manage to find your way out of the paper bag." And a good day to you. I hope that you manage to pull your head out of your ass (unless of course if you already married it). Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:48:05 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168037093 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168029738 "Terry Schiavo's family had that decision not the American people. What the right did was interfere in the lives of private citizens." Nope. Members of her family wanted to keep her alive, and there was conflicting testimony as to what she would have wanted. Her husband went to court and got a death sentence handed down to her. "Terry was brain dead as was like that for over 10 years." Terri was brain damaged. Not brain dead. There is a difference. Besides, I haven't seen anywhere in the law that being brain damaged or brain dead warrants the death penalty. "We do not support abortion. Most libertarians polled abhor abortion. We think its a bad choice but a choice none the less." Nice choice. One human being is going to "choose" to exterminate another. Wow. So much for the liberties and the rights of the person being exterminated! "We do not support changing the definition of marriage, we support government not telling everyone what marriage is." WHAT?!?!?! The government IS telling people what marriage is. "Believe me, being a libertarian is as far from cool as one can get. Come to one of our get together and see the 5000 nerdy guys and two chics." Try being a Christian Conservative. Even HELLywood gives you guys a little bit of respect! "As M_Pritt said, its funny how conservatives cozy up to libertarians when it suits your purposes." And as I said, it's funny how I'm not getting any straight answers from the libertarians. Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:24:17 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168029738 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168025827 "Yes the law applies universally BUT the law is still favoring one group vs another." No, it doesn't. How on earth does the definition of marriage favor one group over another? "Lets use another example. Lets say only white men could own property." That's starting out with a WAY OFF BASE premise. "Now, according to your logic, this law is fair because everyone has to obey this law and its applies to everyone equally be they white, black, male, female etc." Not even close. My argument is very simple. I support equal rights. Any homosexual man can marry any woman he chooses, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any man she chooses, provided that he agrees. Marriage is defined as between a man and a woman. That's the definition of marriage. Deal with it. If the libertarian monsters want to change the definition of marriage, then they should try being honest and state so outright. Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:13:49 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168025827 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168003785 "Libertarians are "Libertarians", thus the name. We believe in the freedom and responsibility of the individual, to the pursuit of happiness with out the interference of the government." That's not true. You animals supported the execution of Terri Schiavo. A mentally disabled woman who committed no crime. You animals support abortion. The death and dismemberment of millions of innocent human beings who have committed no crime. You animals support changing the definition of marriage into something that it never was. Just so that you can look cool. "Funny how how you cozzy up to Libertarians when it is your liberties we are helping to defend, and then snap like a rabid dog when we disagree with one of your archaic beliefs." It's even funnier how you can't answer a couple of questions. Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:02:48 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168003785 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168002543 Well, I guess that your idiotic response was posted after all! Please check out my response below. If you can handle it. Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:58:37 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168002543 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168002095 Well Pruitt, it looks like your response to me did not get posted. I did get your response though in my E-mail. The response that I got from you is as follows: "They have been denied the right to join into a matrimonial union with a person that they love and that loves them. Which, in turn, denies them benefits under the present tax code as well as survivalship benefits. Now, mental midget, you did not win the argument, you talked in circles and ignored what was being said to you because you are not smart enough to come up with a real reason to back you opinion." Let's take a look at this shall we? "They have been denied the right to join into a matrimonial union with a person that they love and that loves them." That is absolutely incorrect. Any homosexual man can marry any woman THAT HE LOVES, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any man THAT SHE LOVES, provided that he agrees. "Which, in turn, denies them benefits under the present tax code as well as survivalship benefits." Once again, that is absolutely incorrect. Any homosexual man can marry any homosexual woman, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any homosexual man, provided that he agrees. "Now, mental midget, you did not win the argument, ...." Actually I did win the argument. You're just too stupid to realize it. "... you talked in circles and ignored what was being said to you ..." That's a lie. I addressed the issues head on, and as a result won the argument. "... because you are not smart enough to come up with a real reason to back you opinion." You still haven't answered the question about how the homosexual monsters have been denied their rights. How have they been denied their rights? Answer the question. Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:57:08 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment168002095 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment167992574 It's because the libertarians have great fiscal sense, and the morality of cannibals. Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:24:45 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment167992574 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment167992216 "OK I have heard some good ones, but this is about the most idiotic attempt at an argument that I have ever heard!!" How? I just won the debate. "Everyone has the right to do exactly what I want to do, but if they want to do anything different, they shouldn't have the right! what kind of BS is that. I want some of what you're smoken' dbehsmen." What rights have the homosexual monsters been denied? Answer me, you intellectual coward. Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:23:45 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment167992216 http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/06/28/progressive-media-suffers-meltdown-over-akins-liberalism-and-god-remark/#IDComment167976651 You're no Catholic. You're one of the demonic liberals who happened to be born into a Catholic family. If you ever want to have some fun, Google the "Roe Effect". It's a fascinating article about how the demoKKKrats have been aborting themselves out of existence. You little monsters deserve it. Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:36:18 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/06/28/progressive-media-suffers-meltdown-over-akins-liberalism-and-god-remark/#IDComment167976651 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment167974192 I once got into an argument with a demonic liberal about homosexual "marriage". It went something like this: Demonic Liberal: It's so unfair that gays don't have equal rights with heterosexuals. Dbehsman: What rights have homosexuals been denied? Have they been denied the right to free speech? Have they been denied the right to free assembly? Have they been denied the right to own a gun? Have they been denied the right to exercise religion? Tell me, what have they been denied? Demonic Liberal: Don't pretend like you don't know what I'm talking about! They don't have the right to marry. It's so unfair. Dbehsman: That's not true. Homosexuals have just as many marriage rights as heterosexuals. Any homosexual man can marry any woman he chooses, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any man she chooses, provided that he agrees. So, how have they been denied their rights? Demonic Liberal: Don't be ridiculous! Gays can't marry the people they love! Gosh, you're so stupid! Dbehsman: That's not true. Any homosexual man can marry any woman THAT HE LOVES, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any man THAT SHE LOVES, provided that he agrees. So, how have they been denied their rights? Demonic Liberal: YOU KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT! They can't marry each other. It's so unfair. Dbehsman: Once again, that's not true. Any homosexual man can marry any homosexual woman, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any homosexual man, provided that he agrees. So, how have they been denied their rights? Demonic Liberal: I can't believe that I have to spell this out for you! MEN CAN'T MARRY MEN, AND WOMEN CAN'T MARRY WOMEN. Dbehsman: Yes, that's correct. Because THAT ISN'T MARRIAGE. Demonic Liberal: You're stupid. Dbehsman: No, you just lost an argument. Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:28:18 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/06/28/stonewall-2011/#IDComment167974192 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9O1THRG0&show_article=1#IDComment166254099 I once got into an argument with a demonic liberal about homosexual "marriage". It went something like this: Demonic Liberal: It's so unfair that gays don't have equal rights with heterosexuals. Dbehsman: What rights have homosexuals been denied? Have they been denied the right to free speech? Have they been denied the right to free assembly? Have they been denied the right to own a gun? Have they been denied the right to exercise religion? Tell me, what have they been denied? Demonic Liberal: Don't pretend like you don't know what I'm talking about! They don't have the right to marry. It's so unfair. Dbehsman: That's not true. Homosexuals have just as many marriage rights as heterosexuals. Any homosexual man can marry any woman he chooses, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any man she chooses, provided that he agrees. So, how have they been denied their rights? Demonic Liberal: Don't be ridiculous! Gays can't marry the people they love! Gosh, you're so stupid! Dbehsman: That's not true. Any homosexual man can marry any woman THAT HE LOVES, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any man THAT SHE LOVES, provided that he agrees. So, how have they been denied their rights? Demonic Liberal: YOU KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT! They can't marry each other. It's so unfair. Dbehsman: Once again, that's not true. Any homosexual man can marry any homosexual woman, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any homosexual man, provided that he agrees. So, how have they been denied their rights? Demonic Liberal: I can't believe that I have to spell this out for you! MEN CAN'T MARRY MEN, AND WOMEN CAN'T MARRY WOMEN. Dbehsman: Yes, that's correct. Because THAT ISN'T MARRIAGE. Demonic Liberal: You're stupid. Dbehsman: No, you just lost an argument. Fri, 24 Jun 2011 19:44:41 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9O1THRG0&show_article=1#IDComment166254099 http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/06/19/sound-bite-for-the-day-i-dont-think-youre-a-coward-for-not-answering-questions/#IDComment164472408 I don't think that Markos is a coward either. He very bravely ran away from the interview. Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:09:57 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/06/19/sound-bite-for-the-day-i-dont-think-youre-a-coward-for-not-answering-questions/#IDComment164472408 http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2011/06/19/mediaites-tommy-christopher-was-given-fake-ids-in-weinergate-story/#IDComment164460432 What really bothers me about this whole affair is the caviler attitude taken towards positions of high honor. Member of the United States House of Representatives United States Senator President of the United States Vice President of the United States Secretary of State Secretary of Defense Supreme Court Justice Governor All of these positions are not only positions of high responsibility, but they are a high honor. These are job descriptions that go on a person's tombstone. Four or five generations at least will pass in a politician's family before these positions are forgotten. Is it REALLY TOO MUCH to ask that while a person is in the office, that they refrain from acting like a baboon?!?!?! I understand that everybody has a past, and has done stupid things that they regret. I understand that when they are out of office, they are free to do whatever they want. But, while they're in office can we at least expect people to act civilized? Mon, 20 Jun 2011 03:21:44 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2011/06/19/mediaites-tommy-christopher-was-given-fake-ids-in-weinergate-story/#IDComment164460432 http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/06/18/nazi-grandma-himmlers-daughter-carries-her-fathers-flame-to-a-new-generation-of-nazis/#IDComment164425477 "but not one reproach... yet we still get ragged about the Civil War." Don't forget. The French and the British openly supported and sold arms to the Confederacy. They wanted cheap cotton, and didn't care how they got it. And then they act as if they are superior. Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:50:37 +0000 http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2011/06/18/nazi-grandma-himmlers-daughter-carries-her-fathers-flame-to-a-new-generation-of-nazis/#IDComment164425477