<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/324369</link>
		<description>Comments by David Rothman</description>
<item>
<title>davidrothman.net : *Really* Stupid Health Social Site</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19964732</link>
<description>Science is about empirical evidence, not survey data.  To call comments on drugs from self-selecting users in uncontrolled conditions &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; is like calling creationism &amp;quot;science&amp;quot; or calling homeopathy &amp;quot;medicine.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19964732</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : *Really* Stupid Health Social Site</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19962915</link>
<description>And my point is that double blind studies ARE the best mechanism to ensure user experience is captured in the least biased way possible. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19962915</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : *Really* Stupid Health Social Site</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19961265</link>
<description>Jon, self-selecting users contributing feedback in an uncontrolled setting are not providing evidence. &amp;quot;Anecdotal evidence&amp;quot; is not evidence. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19961265</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : *Really* Stupid Health Social Site</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19932042</link>
<description>Ian- Yes.  Precisely. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/04/25/really-stupid-social-health-site/#IDComment19932042</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : Venting About a Vendor</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/24/venting-about-a-lousy-vendor-sales-rep/#IDComment17576009</link>
<description>Got an emailed comment from a reader who wishes to remain anonymous but gave me permission to share her experience.  &lt;blockquote&gt;My vendor rant relates to a salesperson&amp;rsquo;s response to my request for a quote for a reduced number of simultaneous users.  I explained that we had to economize and cut back and his response was &lt;i&gt;&amp;ldquo;Is there anything we can do, such as offer you XXX, along with your current XXX subscription, for no additional cost?  I am trying to get creative and would be open to any suggestions or ideas.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/i&gt;  My (internal) response was, How about giving me the info I requested, not suggesting we pay the same amount and also receive a product we don&amp;rsquo;t want?  His creativity left a lot to be desired.  While he promised me the quote that same day, I had to send another email a few days later requesting the quote again which I didn&amp;rsquo;t receive for a week after my original request.  ...  This same vendor once opened up access (unbeknownst to me) to one of their products for our entire campus for a month and then had the nerve to quote me usage stats as an indicator of interest then insisting we should purchase it.  Boy that salesman...got an earful from me.&lt;/blockquote&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/24/venting-about-a-lousy-vendor-sales-rep/#IDComment17576009</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : Venting About a Vendor</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/24/venting-about-a-lousy-vendor-sales-rep/#IDComment17575848</link>
<description>I didn&amp;#039;t know you&amp;#039;d decided to make PubGet free to libraries, Ian!  That&amp;#039;s spectacular!  The trick with vendors of information resources is that sometimes there really &lt;i&gt;isn&amp;#039;t&lt;/i&gt; an appropriate product available from a competitor. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/24/venting-about-a-lousy-vendor-sales-rep/#IDComment17575848</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : Venting About a Vendor</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/24/venting-about-a-lousy-vendor-sales-rep/#IDComment17564757</link>
<description>I absolutely agree, Ian.  (Just spent a few minutes looking for pricing info on &lt;a href=&quot;http://pubget.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pubget.com&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://pubget.com&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/a&gt; but only to give you a hard time.)  ;) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/24/venting-about-a-lousy-vendor-sales-rep/#IDComment17564757</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : Congraulations To Movers and Shakers!</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/15/congraulations-to-movers-and-shakers/#IDComment17248759</link>
<description>Hi Jason-  It isn&amp;#039;t my list- the list is made by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libraryjournal.com/?layout=MS2009&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Library Journal&lt;/a&gt;.  Absolutely, though: Nominate her Kraftiness for 2010! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/15/congraulations-to-movers-and-shakers/#IDComment17248759</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : IntenseDebate Test</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/02/16/intensedebate-test/#IDComment15297765</link>
<description>Also annoying: IntenseDebate doesn&amp;#039;t seem to realize that davidlrothman on FF is me.  :( </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/02/16/intensedebate-test/#IDComment15297765</guid>
</item><item>
<title>davidrothman.net : More About the Book</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/01/15/more-about-the-book/#IDComment15235523</link>
<description>Thanks, Rachel!  (Rachel commented on this post in FriendFeed to see if IntenseDebate would see it and import it here.  Cool, eh?) </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/01/15/more-about-the-book/#IDComment15235523</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>