26 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0
Oh, and remember you are a guest on this blog. So keep a civil tongue in your head or you will be banned.
Secondly, the argument that a proposition can't be right because that would mean lots of people have been wrong for many years does not stand up to scrutiny. You think about it - how many times has this happened in the past?
I'm not arguing for or against this new hypothesis. I'm just saying your reaction to it is ill-considered.
Without a proper definition of "god", I do not know where I would fit on the graph.
Are we talking about obviously made-up, logically contradictory constructs such as Yahweh or Allah? I think it's possible to know that these gods don't exist, and I definitely don't believe in them. So that would put me somewhere near the bottom left (truncated) corner.
Are we talking about a deistic "prime mover" without human characteristics, which created the universe and is now, as Ali G put it, "just chilling"? We can't really know whether such a thing exists or not - it isn't self-contradictory like Yahweh - but I still don't believe in it. So that would put me near the top left.
Or are we using a pantheistic definition, where god is nature? If we accept such a definition, I think we can pretty much know that "god" exists, and I believe in it. So that would put me down at the bottom right.
Which brings us to the problem of the "quirk box", where two different types of god suddenly make an appearance. God-type cannot be determined by the sum of your atheism + agnosticism, because your atheism/agnosticism is determined by which type of god you are talking about!
Even on its own terms, the quirk box doesn't really hold up to scrutiny. It is perfectly possible to think you can know for sure that personified, interventionist god exists (I have met many people who think this), which would put you at the extreme bottom right. Equally, you might well think that you can't really know about a "mysterious higher power", but still believe very strongly in it, which would put you in the top right.
So I will limit myself to saying that yes, your words are acutely embarrassing, and your lack of personal insight only serves to make them more so. For future reference, phrases of such ignorant bigotry and hatred as \"Muslims are barbaric. They are happiest when they are killing\" are not acceptable here. I am the administrator of this website, and if you come up with any more shit like that, you will be banned. Got it?