I found it surprising, they had 3 years of income, pension contributions and the possibility they could get rid of corbyn before 2020 and even after he loses corbyn could stay on with the support of the new party members.
went on for years in Scotland Glasgow in particular until along came an alternative.
we run large fleets of diesels, modern diesels are much cleaner and more equipment is being added to make them even cleaner. The biggest problem in built up areas are buses and under 2T delivery vans many of which are poorly maintained. Buses are now going hybrid. the country depends on diesel all road freight is diesel and a lot of rail freight. Even on electric lines diesels are used because they need to go offgrid at either end.
in 5 weeks it could all go wrong although with Diane Abbot as the opposition it could be even bigger
or were Jeremy from North London, Diane BSc maths (failed) John the Scouser and the four members of Momentum who can read.
te author appears to be either delusional or an idiot if he thinks everyone is rallying round and it is going to be simple. The EU is going to be vindictive and make sure the 27 don't want to leave. Politically making sure Britain fails is what they want.
in 1992 labour was led by a welsh windbag and had suggested tax rises. In 1994 the tories went in for infighting and labour elected someone who knew how to win elections and in 1997 wiped us out in Scotland and won the first of three elections and could have won again if Brown had not been an idiot.
In 2017 labour is led by a well meaning idiot but what happens in 2022 when the EU deal might be a little disappointing and the rest of the world are not wanting to trade with us. Labour gets a sensible leader and we apply to rejoin the EU.
which public services and welfare do you wish to cut and how much is the saving. If we don't pay any demands from the EU then they can put up tariff barriers and get their money that way.
the majority is not gong to affect dealings with the EU. They are going to put their interests first whether May has the backing of 1 or 649 MPs.
having been involved with universities through our business/university partnerships where we have invested in their research I don't think you can generalise on worthless pseudo degrees. There are many new degree subjects some of which align with new business practices. In our own trade what is now called logistics is much more complex than just moving objects. One of our divisions deals with aircraft fuel analysis. You don't just top up the plane to full at every stop. Carrying unnecessary fuel is inefficient and can be dangerous if a plane has to return with full tanks. Add in price differentials and it becomes more complex. There are graduate qualifications which include the logistics. Designing software to handle this needs not just a knowledge of software development but also a whole range of fuel parameters.
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Medley