<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/655768</link>
		<description>Comments by david_n</description>
<item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : 9/11: Our Truth, and Theirs</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/09/10/911-our-truth-and-theirs/#IDComment34047740</link>
<description>JR: &amp;laquo;Yet anyone who questions the official story &amp;ndash; the narrative of 19 Arab dudes going on what would seem to be a rather quixotic jihad, haphazardly making their way through a strange foreign country on their own, all the while readying themselves for The Day That Changed History &amp;ndash; is denounced as a &amp;quot;conspiracy theorist,&amp;quot; a crackpot, and worse.&amp;raquo;  Right on, Mr. Raimondo! Labeling people crackpots just because they question an official story and have different opinions is completely uncalled for! Couldn&amp;#039;t agree more.  JR: &amp;laquo;Of course, some of the people who challenge the official story are, indeed, crackpots&amp;raquo;  Oh...  Oh well, at least I got a good laugh out of it! Thanks, Mr. Raimondo.  By the way, I&amp;#039;m sure you&amp;#039;re aware that some of these &amp;#039;crackpots&amp;#039; are actually regular Antiwar.com contributors. I&amp;#039;m sure you&amp;#039;re aware of it because you&amp;#039;re probably the one in charge of censoring any articles they write about 9/11. (what an annoying little habit that is, I gotta tell you!...) Why do you do it? Perhaps you consider them &amp;#039;part-time crackpots&amp;#039;?... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/09/10/911-our-truth-and-theirs/#IDComment34047740</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>