<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/339254</link>
		<description>Comments by davemoyer</description>
<item>
<title>Aimless Agenda : Aimless Agenda #9 - 5/15/09</title>
<link>http://www.aimlessagenda.com/episodes/2009-05-15/aimless-agenda-9-51509/#IDComment21582688</link>
<description>Thanks guys. Something got uploaded in the wrong place- should all be fixed now. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 04:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.aimlessagenda.com/episodes/2009-05-15/aimless-agenda-9-51509/#IDComment21582688</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Dave Moyer : Thunderbird vs. Outlook: Email App Showdown!</title>
<link>http://davemoyer.org/2008/06/22/thunderbird-vs-outlook-email-app-showdown/#IDComment21143241</link>
<description>Again, I didn&amp;#039;t say I haven&amp;#039;t spent time with either. Do you really think that someone like me would go through all this trouble to write a review for something I haven&amp;#039;t really used? Of course not! I said that for day to day email, I use Gmail. It&amp;#039;s still my favorite.  I have also spent extensive time with both Outlook and Thunderbird to try them out not only from a review standpoint, but to see if they&amp;#039;re something I want to use! I went to Gmail because in my opinion, it&amp;#039;s the best. (I&amp;#039;ve written another post on that also.) Do you think that in order to review something it has to be the client I use? I&amp;#039;d think that would make me more biased, wouldn&amp;#039;t it? ;) </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2009 17:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davemoyer.org/2008/06/22/thunderbird-vs-outlook-email-app-showdown/#IDComment21143241</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Aimless Agenda : Aimless Agenda #6 - 4/24/09</title>
<link>http://www.aimlessagenda.com/episodes/2009-04-24/aimless-agenda-6-42409/#IDComment20167520</link>
<description>Thanks for the note, Stephanie! Looking into it. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.aimlessagenda.com/episodes/2009-04-24/aimless-agenda-6-42409/#IDComment20167520</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Dave Moyer : WordCamp San Francisco 2009</title>
<link>http://davemoyer.org/2009/04/23/wordcamp-san-francisco-2009/#IDComment20034287</link>
<description>It should be great! Except my name&amp;#039;s not Mark. Mark Moyer&amp;#039;s actually my dad. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davemoyer.org/2009/04/23/wordcamp-san-francisco-2009/#IDComment20034287</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Dave Moyer : Top eight reasons why WordPress users need to get to a WordCamp</title>
<link>http://davemoyer.org/2009/03/02/top-ten-reasons-why-wordpress-users-need-to-get-to-a-wordcamp/#IDComment16085761</link>
<description>Aww... well I must say, the TRUE #1 for WordCamp Denver was getting to spend a weekend with the one and only Lorelle. It was great having you, and I&amp;#039;ll let you know when that instant particle transporter starts working.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davemoyer.org/2009/03/02/top-ten-reasons-why-wordpress-users-need-to-get-to-a-wordcamp/#IDComment16085761</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>