<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/755789</link>
		<description>Comments by Daniel Huckstep</description>
<item>
<title>Nicola Racco&#039;s Blog - English : /it/admin/contents/14</title>
<link>http://www.nicolaracco.com/en/#IDComment94995326</link>
<description>Can you define &amp;#039;incompatible&amp;#039;? MongoMapper is hardly incompatible. Maybe not 100% integrated, but I&amp;#039;m using it in a Rails 3 project, and it works just fine. I&amp;#039;m also using Mongoid in a Rails 3 project, and while it&amp;#039;s definitely more integrated, it&amp;#039;s hardly the only option for Rails 3 + MongoDB. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.nicolaracco.com/en/#IDComment94995326</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Bitsource®: Technology&#039;s Premier Source of Information : Rackspace Cloud Servers versus Amazon EC2: Performance Analysis</title>
<link>http://www.thebitsource.com/featured-posts/rackspace-cloud-servers-versus-amazon-ec2-performance-analysis/#IDComment51570496</link>
<description>Very interesting. It makes you think about more things when you are comparing cloud services.  The other half of the discussion is: Does it really make any difference in real world applications? I suppose that&amp;#039;s the question you always have to when dealing with artificial benchmarks.  On a side note, what script are you using for the image lightboxing? It&amp;#039;s amazing! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.thebitsource.com/featured-posts/rackspace-cloud-servers-versus-amazon-ec2-performance-analysis/#IDComment51570496</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>