<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/603280</link>
		<description>Comments by dantiernan</description>
<item>
<title>Feld Thoughts : Zeitoun</title>
<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/11/zeitoun.html#IDComment44415587</link>
<description>Thanks for highlighting this book.  Got it on Friday and read it on Saturday/Sunday.  First book I read over a weekend in a long, long time.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2009/11/zeitoun.html#IDComment44415587</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Redeye VC : Help me rename &quot;Lifestyle Business&quot;</title>
<link>http://redeye.firstround.com/2009/07/we-need-a-new-name-for-this.html#IDComment26963272</link>
<description>You might not want me &amp;quot;labeling&amp;quot; your kids and I would not want you labeling my startup - too emotional.  What might be intended as a compliment could be misinterpreted.  I am not sure you are giving yourself credit for the beauty of your current response:  &amp;quot;I will not generate the risk-adjusted returns I need&amp;quot;  You just turned this away from labeling them to highlighting YOUR challenge or limitation.  That&amp;#039;s awesome.  They are great, but you can&amp;#039;t invest because of your limitations.  If you really want a new term,  I would focus on describing the characteristic of their business that limits your ability to invest, e.g. not &amp;quot;venture-scaleable&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://redeye.firstround.com/2009/07/we-need-a-new-name-for-this.html#IDComment26963272</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>