<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/265207</link>
		<description>Comments by Daniel</description>
<item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=3176</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=3176#IDComment37441343</link>
<description>Missed that one and fixed it. K-State and Gonzaga swap. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=3176#IDComment37441343</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : Who\&#039;s the next NFL rushing king? Breaking it down statistically</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=806#IDComment35062960</link>
<description>Moe the point of the article wasn&amp;#039;t to talk about the best running backs ever. Obviously Brown is on that list. The point was to find the next NFL rushing king. Smith is given the title because he has the most rushing yards in NFL history. That&amp;#039;s why the article was written based on seeing which current running backs could break Smith&amp;#039;s all-time record.  I mentioned Payton and Sanders because of where they rank on the all-time rushing list.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=806#IDComment35062960</guid>
</item><item>
<title>College Football Saturday : http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=1155</title>
<link>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=1155#IDComment34057936</link>
<description>Got it </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=1155#IDComment34057936</guid>
</item><item>
<title>College Football Saturday : http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=1155</title>
<link>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=1155#IDComment33818314</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s why my Tennessee-UCLA prediction says &amp;quot;the Vols went BACK to Knoxville with their tails tucked between their legs&amp;quot; and includes the phrase &amp;quot;went out west&amp;quot;.  I mis-typed Georgia, so thanks for pointing it out.   Also I looked up the Wisconsin-Fresno game last season because I thought it was at Fresno but multiple sites had it backwards. Either that or I was delirious. I&amp;#039;ve corrected it. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=1155#IDComment33818314</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : The Favre Survey: Does He Annoy You?</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=3039#IDComment31226115</link>
<description>Then it looks like you&amp;#039;ve got two choices. Congrats. Mistakes happen.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=3039#IDComment31226115</guid>
</item><item>
<title>College Football Saturday : Preseason Quarterback Rankings 1-20</title>
<link>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=366#IDComment31113398</link>
<description>Statistically it was not a good season and he was awful at passing, but this isn&amp;#039;t the pro game. Quarterbacks can run just as often as they throw and be effective in college and for all intensive purposes Taylor was last season. He led the Hokies to a Orange Bowl win. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=366#IDComment31113398</guid>
</item><item>
<title>College Football Saturday : Preseason Running Back Rankings 1-20</title>
<link>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=434#IDComment31035485</link>
<description>He&amp;#039;s listed but he&amp;#039;s not top 15 just based off stats. I know I have every right to ignore you but chose not to. That&amp;#039;s my choice. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=434#IDComment31035485</guid>
</item><item>
<title>College Football Saturday : Preseason Running Back Rankings 1-20</title>
<link>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=434#IDComment31026819</link>
<description>Hmmmm how about because he&amp;#039;s already graduated? Here&amp;#039;s the latest on him for you:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2009/05/bears_release_rb_tyrell_fenroy.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears/2009/05/bears_rel...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=434#IDComment31026819</guid>
</item><item>
<title>College Football Saturday : Preseason Quarterback Rankings 1-20</title>
<link>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=366#IDComment30988193</link>
<description>Grothe and Pike are both quarterbacks that would&amp;#039;ve made my top 25. I don&amp;#039;t mind criticism but you haven&amp;#039;t even explained why Grothe &amp;amp; Pike deserve to be on the list. If you have a different opinion then fine but you don&amp;#039;t have to call me a dumbass because you disagree. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=366#IDComment30988193</guid>
</item><item>
<title>College Football Saturday : Preseason Quarterback Rankings 1-20</title>
<link>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=366#IDComment30966198</link>
<description>Love the comment. One misplaced U in the entire article makes me a dumbass. Glad to see your an intellectual individual. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://collegefootballsaturday.com/?p=366#IDComment30966198</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : The Best 60 College Football Games of the Upcoming Season</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=970#IDComment30616239</link>
<description>Just had to stop the list at some point Hector. Texas Tech should still be pretty good although the loss of Baron Batch is pretty rough. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=970#IDComment30616239</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : Sportsperson of the decade: 32 team field vote</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=2320#IDComment26563474</link>
<description>It might but I also think people are taking everything into account. I can&amp;#039;t really say it&amp;#039;s any easier to win in an individual sport but i do agree that the athlete has 100% control over what happens in his own personal game in an individual sport. It&amp;#039;s a tough call. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=2320#IDComment26563474</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : Sportsperson of the decade: 32 team field vote</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=2320#IDComment26233431</link>
<description>I do have a spelling error because I put Jimmiie as a typo but you are wrong. Jimmie Johnson is the NASCAR driver and his name is spelled correctly other than the typo. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=2320#IDComment26233431</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : Sportsperson of the decade: 32 team field vote</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=2320#IDComment26190090</link>
<description>I can&amp;#039;t add them to the poll without messing it up. I am considering taking out the top 16 of this poll and then doing another poll to get the final 16. If I do so I will add some of them. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=2320#IDComment26190090</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : Sportsperson of the decade: 32 team field vote</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=2320#IDComment26153719</link>
<description>Agreed. Hansbrough is a no brainer if Young and Bush (and Tebow) make the list. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2009 18:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=2320#IDComment26153719</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : Ranking Every U. S. Open Golfer\&#039;s Chances 1-156</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1991#IDComment24377844</link>
<description>Obviously. Maybe I should just quit or maybe we should wait until Sunday night to see what happens. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1991#IDComment24377844</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : Ranking Every U. S. Open Golfer\&#039;s Chances 1-156</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1991#IDComment24374099</link>
<description>Thank you wizdomheard. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1991#IDComment24374099</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : Ranking Every U. S. Open Golfer\&#039;s Chances 1-156</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1991#IDComment24374011</link>
<description>I will be doing live coverage here and on Twitter.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1991#IDComment24374011</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : Lakers May Soon Be Our New NBA Champions, But Give Credit Where Credit Is Due</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1973#IDComment23748542</link>
<description>Colin it would be Kobe&amp;#039;s first title without Shaq, not LA&amp;#039;s.......just pointing it out lol </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1973#IDComment23748542</guid>
</item><item>
<title>OnlineSportsFanatic : It\&#039;s Confirmed: Kobe is Winning WITHOUT Shaquille O\&#039; Neal</title>
<link>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1953#IDComment23644431</link>
<description>Kobe only shot 5 times in the first half CC. He was trying to pass and get his teammates involved early. He shot 40% (2-5) in the 1H so it wasn&amp;#039;t that he wasn&amp;#039;t awake.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://onlinesportsfanatic.com/?p=1953#IDComment23644431</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>