<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/919316</link>
		<description>Comments by danielmrose</description>
<item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : Strong, weak, what!?</title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/04/strong-weak-what/#IDComment68375812</link>
<description>I think that&amp;#039;s a great analogy.  Along with being gentle, patient, not condescending, and not dismissing it seems that we are also to be giving a hand up to help folks get to the next rung on the tower. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/04/strong-weak-what/#IDComment68375812</guid>
</item><item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : Are you gonna eat that? </title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/04/are-you-gonna-eat-that/#IDComment67752343</link>
<description>Laura, I think it is too!  Good call! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/04/are-you-gonna-eat-that/#IDComment67752343</guid>
</item><item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : You get up on Sunday and do what!? or the Church Question</title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/you-get-up-on-sunday-and-do-what-or-the-church-question/#IDComment63658004</link>
<description>Initiative. Great word!  It ties into another word that has been bouncing around our community at Grace Chapel for a little while: intentional. I wonder what would happen if intentional and initiative ever got married? That would be a movement! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/you-get-up-on-sunday-and-do-what-or-the-church-question/#IDComment63658004</guid>
</item><item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : You get up on Sunday and do what!? or the Church Question</title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/you-get-up-on-sunday-and-do-what-or-the-church-question/#IDComment63657822</link>
<description>Wow. Could you imagine if the church&amp;#039;s problems and the problems of its community were the same? That&amp;#039;s called effectiveness. Then you add in the necessity of the crucified and risen Lord? Dang.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/you-get-up-on-sunday-and-do-what-or-the-church-question/#IDComment63657822</guid>
</item><item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : Who&#039;s the Big Guy Upstairs? or The God Question</title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-big-guy-upstairs-or-the-god-question/#IDComment63046441</link>
<description>I can see Brueggmann&amp;#039;s perspective. But, I think that it is more than that.  An aspect of the Scriptures is the collective memory of God&amp;#039;s people, for sure, but it is just an aspect.  The Scriptures self-testify as being breathed out by God.  I think that we cannot look past their own claim of being being God&amp;#039;s words (unless of course we are trying to set aside their authority because we don&amp;#039;t like authority).   I agree with you that the Bible goes back and forth in perspectives but I think it&amp;#039;s more like an author who is also functioning as a narrator.  We would be foolish to disconnect the author from the non-narrator aspects of the story. I disagree with you that progressive revelation and the evolving perspective are two sides of the same coin.  I disagree because the latter does not authentically take into account God&amp;#039;s transcendence.  Why does God progressively reveal himself? I do not really know.  My best guess is that he does so because he is transcendent and infinite and we are finite.    I like how Paul puts it, &amp;quot;&amp;ldquo;For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly&amp;rdquo; (Romans 5:6 ESV).  It was at the &amp;quot;right time&amp;quot; that Christ died for the ungodly.  There is a progression in God&amp;#039;s self-revelation and quite honestly I know not the mind of God.    That&amp;#039;s my take, most likely I am wrong.  But, for now, I have not seen anything that would change my perspective. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-big-guy-upstairs-or-the-god-question/#IDComment63046441</guid>
</item><item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : Extra, Extra, Good News!!! or the Gospel Question</title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/extra-extra-good-news-or-the-gospel-question/#IDComment63010533</link>
<description>Thanks Andy!  I appreciate all the interaction on these posts.  It&amp;#039;s really helpful.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/extra-extra-good-news-or-the-gospel-question/#IDComment63010533</guid>
</item><item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : Who&#039;s the long haired freak? or The Jesus Question</title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-long-haired-freak-or-the-jesus-question/#IDComment62797020</link>
<description>I think he may be right.  That being said, it is a shame, because it points to the fact that the greater Christian community is no longer able to have an appropriate good/bad split.  This book has so much to offer and many will miss it because he is not &amp;quot;orthodox&amp;quot;.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-long-haired-freak-or-the-jesus-question/#IDComment62797020</guid>
</item><item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : Who&#039;s the long haired freak? or The Jesus Question</title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-long-haired-freak-or-the-jesus-question/#IDComment62680036</link>
<description>I wish he was espousing Christus Victor, if he was then the case can be more easily made for some aspect of atonement.  I think he is moving towards a liberation theology.  Have you read &amp;quot;The Atonement Debate&amp;quot;?  It did a nice job of framing the debate.  McLaren seems to line up most closely to Steven Chalke, although he doesn&amp;#039;t go as far (at least not blatantly). </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-long-haired-freak-or-the-jesus-question/#IDComment62680036</guid>
</item><item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : Who&#039;s the Big Guy Upstairs? or The God Question</title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-big-guy-upstairs-or-the-god-question/#IDComment62608031</link>
<description>You got it!  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-big-guy-upstairs-or-the-god-question/#IDComment62608031</guid>
</item><item>
<title>infinite subversive journey : Who&#039;s the long haired freak? or The Jesus Question</title>
<link>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-long-haired-freak-or-the-jesus-question/#IDComment62607901</link>
<description>I really hope it&amp;#039;s just balancing the scales. The atonement is one of those big deals. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://danielmrose.com/2010/03/whos-the-long-haired-freak-or-the-jesus-question/#IDComment62607901</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>