<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/551879</link>
		<description>Comments by dan_pontefract</description>
<item>
<title>The FASTForward Blog : A Curious Case of Enterprise 2.0 </title>
<link>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/05/20/a-curious-case-of-enterprise-20/#IDComment22361952</link>
<description>Time and time again, we in the &amp;#039;tech space&amp;#039; tend to think and position the tools first, prior to thinking through the process or people requirements.&lt;p&gt;  Bright shiny objects are littered throughout organizations from a technology perspective, because due diligence (and prudence) was never carried out from an organizational process &amp;amp; people perspective first.&lt;p&gt;  This article is dated (1997) but it always reminds me to think about the process and people first, then the tool. (and I am a &amp;#039;learning&amp;#039; guy, so I tend to think about people first, then process, then technology)&lt;p&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?contentType=Article&amp;amp;Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0370290701.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContent...&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;p&gt;McAfee has great points, great research, great stories, and an interesting angle most of the time. I couch his views, however, with the people/process mantra when interpreting his results and findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 23:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2009/05/20/a-curious-case-of-enterprise-20/#IDComment22361952</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>