<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/472259</link>
		<description>Comments by damjanov</description>
<item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : Where telco&#039;s could go</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/12/where-telcos-could-go/#IDComment63950626</link>
<description>They aren&amp;#039;t pre-moderated. Comment engine is IntenseDebate, which runs all comments through it&amp;#039;s filters. For some reason, it had doubts as to whether or not you are a real person.  Are you real?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/12/where-telcos-could-go/#IDComment63950626</guid>
</item><item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : Where telco&#039;s could go</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/12/where-telcos-could-go/#IDComment60577180</link>
<description>Agreed - no doubt they are trying to attach as much functionality as they can into the devices, but there are some things a mobile will never be able to do. It will never be a microwave for example. Or a toaster. =P (not that I&amp;#039;m saying I want my toast net-enabled, thought it would be cool if my to-do list could be toasted into my bread every morning). </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Mar 2010 05:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/12/where-telcos-could-go/#IDComment60577180</guid>
</item><item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : Best Browser Notice Ever</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/11/best-browser-notice-ever/#IDComment45229590</link>
<description>And hopefully HTML5 can bring an end to the overuse of Flash. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/11/best-browser-notice-ever/#IDComment45229590</guid>
</item><item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : On Westfield&#039;s Gift Card</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/11/on-westfields-gift-card/#IDComment45002780</link>
<description>Exactly!   A lot of people are saying &amp;quot;pfft, it&amp;#039;s just a status update and disappears after an hour&amp;quot; and similar, but the point here is, this is a campaign that breaches the terms that were put in place. If ALL advertisers now started taking this approach on Facebook, it would start turning into exactly what MySpace was 2-3 years ago. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/11/on-westfields-gift-card/#IDComment45002780</guid>
</item><item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : On Newspapers</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/08/john-hartigan-newspapers/#IDComment35605832</link>
<description>Very true, newspaper quality is quite detailed, and blogs are often not of the same quality, but I guess the point I was trying to get to is newspapers aren&amp;#039;t competing just with Blogs, they&amp;#039;re competing with most of the internet. At least, that&amp;#039;s what I was trying to get across. Might not have come through entirely =P  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/2009/08/john-hartigan-newspapers/#IDComment35605832</guid>
</item><item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : Politics</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32263774</link>
<description>Nobody missed your point dude, we all got it, the very first time you said it. It&amp;#039;s my point you seem to have missed continually as you shift your argument from relevance to choice to my tax bracket to how much &amp;#039;fun&amp;#039; you&amp;#039;re having arguing all this.  At this point, I&amp;#039;m resorting to saying &amp;quot;nevermind Paulie&amp;quot;, and lets forget about it.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32263774</guid>
</item><item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : Politics</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32143328</link>
<description>Nope, was most certainly looking at your lengthy, over-capitalised, hilarious comment. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32143328</guid>
</item><item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : Politics</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32139772</link>
<description>So, the short answer is &amp;quot;No Damian, it is impossible for me to admit that I was wrong in an argument, EVER&amp;quot;.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32139772</guid>
</item><item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : Politics</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32139579</link>
<description>As I stated above in the post, &amp;quot;extraodinarily difficult at the least&amp;quot; to be totally unaffected by government whatsoever, but if somehow you manage to be, sure, it would be irrelevant. Although I seriously challenge you to find anybody who is _totally_ unaffected by government in any way.  But, hypotheticals aside, in Paulie&amp;#039;s case, he&amp;#039;s quite affected. He catches public transport, pays a mortgage, pays tax, is employed in financial services, uses medicare, pays HECS, has a passport, travels overseas. There are MANY touch-points to eliminate his &amp;quot;irrelevant&amp;quot; argument (which is after all, the whole point here). Would you not agree? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32139579</guid>
</item><item>
<title>aslkjalkjsd : Politics</title>
<link>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32130899</link>
<description>Oh god.  Seriously, you&amp;#039;ve entirely shifted your argument. We weren&amp;#039;t arguing _choice_ at any stage. We were talking about RELEVANCE (and your total misunderstanding of the word irrelevant).  YOU stated that if you agree with current party/policy/people, you should vote for them, if you don&amp;#039;t, you should vote against them, and if &amp;quot;irrelevant&amp;quot; you shouldn&amp;#039;t vote. The fact is, that regardless of the parties, or people, it IS relevant to you.  THAT was the point (which you conveniently decided to move away from).  I just wish for once you might be able to say &amp;quot;Sorry, I might have been wrong&amp;quot;.  I agree, that you&amp;#039;re opinion of having the choice to vote or not has valid points, but surely, you must agree that voting is absolutely relevant, whether you&amp;#039;re interested in the parties or not. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.refinedgeek.com/politics/#IDComment32130899</guid>
</item><item>
<title>mrpaulkoch : Tumblr Video</title>
<link>http://www.mrpaulkoch.com/post/103992940#IDComment20884869</link>
<description>I strongly believe that actors should only be allowed to play one hero character in these kinds of series-based action movies.  Bale is Batman. BATMAN DAMMIT! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 May 2009 14:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.mrpaulkoch.com/post/103992940#IDComment20884869</guid>
</item><item>
<title>damjanov : Tumblr Link</title>
<link>http://damjanov.tumblr.com/post/101774674#IDComment20254667</link>
<description>Oh, and sorry I couldn&amp;#039;t come to Wolverine last night.  Would have loved to, but I was too busy, reading your blog. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://damjanov.tumblr.com/post/101774674#IDComment20254667</guid>
</item><item>
<title>damjanov : Tumblr Link</title>
<link>http://damjanov.tumblr.com/post/101774674#IDComment20254373</link>
<description>You sure did dude! You are teh uber-geek!  I bow down.  Now, I shall go to YOU for all my tech questions. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://damjanov.tumblr.com/post/101774674#IDComment20254373</guid>
</item><item>
<title>mrpaulkoch : Tumblr Photo</title>
<link>http://www.mrpaulkoch.com/post/101711204#IDComment20253205</link>
<description>Lol... great site. Love the 5 worst. Love the 5 best too. Great being in a geek-geek relationship. We have soooo much fun with the lightbulbs... and joss whedon. =P  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.mrpaulkoch.com/post/101711204#IDComment20253205</guid>
</item><item>
<title>mrpaulkoch : Tumblr Photo</title>
<link>http://www.mrpaulkoch.com/post/101233155#IDComment20127330</link>
<description>Nice work getting the comments going dude!  Now, all you got left is your analytics! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.mrpaulkoch.com/post/101233155#IDComment20127330</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>