<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1462843</link>
		<description>Comments by chuckinCT</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : August Surprise (Bribe): Massive Mortgage Bailout</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/05/august-surprise-bribe-massive-mortgage-bailout/#IDComment91193609</link>
<description>Is there any legal ramifications to this vote? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/05/august-surprise-bribe-massive-mortgage-bailout/#IDComment91193609</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : August Surprise (Bribe): Massive Mortgage Bailout</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/05/august-surprise-bribe-massive-mortgage-bailout/#IDComment91192917</link>
<description>&amp;quot;GSE policies are one of a dwindling number of policy levers the administration has left to pull, so it is conceivable that changes could be made, though there is no sign that a policy change is imminent. The Treasurys essentially unlimited ability to provide financial support to the GSEs creates an interesting situation over the next twelve months: the GSEs could potentially be used to provide additional support for the housing market and, to a lesser extent, the broader economy in 2H 2001.&amp;quot;  2nd half 2001? Typo or old article? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/05/august-surprise-bribe-massive-mortgage-bailout/#IDComment91192917</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Couple Questions for Rep. Andre Carson</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sright/2010/07/22/a-couple-questions-for-rep-andre-carson/#IDComment88071098</link>
<description>Sigh......watch the video on this website and tell me at the @ 2:28 spot where the congresscritter turns his head the video cuts away to show some words and doesn&amp;#039;t go back to exact same spot? I am saying just show the whole video straight through with NO editing </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sright/2010/07/22/a-couple-questions-for-rep-andre-carson/#IDComment88071098</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Context Is Everything. NAACP’s Jealous &#039;Snookered&#039; Himself</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment88058192</link>
<description>absolutely nothing..that is them not her, she was talking about her redemption and if it helped those in the audience to be better human beings in the future, good, if not, that is their failing. it goes both ways with the race issue </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment88058192</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Couple Questions for Rep. Andre Carson</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sright/2010/07/22/a-couple-questions-for-rep-andre-carson/#IDComment88057037</link>
<description>Once again, you edited at the 2:28 mark where the spit happened. Show the whole video from start to end with NO editing and then make these claims.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sright/2010/07/22/a-couple-questions-for-rep-andre-carson/#IDComment88057037</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Context Is Everything. NAACP’s Jealous &#039;Snookered&#039; Himself</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87926715</link>
<description>Why didn&amp;#039;t Andrew vet his sources and release the whole tape? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87926715</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Context Is Everything. NAACP’s Jealous &#039;Snookered&#039; Himself</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87925947</link>
<description>fair enough....  :-) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87925947</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Context Is Everything. NAACP’s Jealous &#039;Snookered&#039; Himself</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87905049</link>
<description>Did Andrew present all the facts before posting the video?    btw wtf is Rule #3?  BUT I will admit that the administration was to quick to pass judgement without all the facts. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87905049</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Context Is Everything. NAACP’s Jealous &#039;Snookered&#039; Himself</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87902684</link>
<description>I am still trying to figure out why I have a  -27..maybe truth hurts? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87902684</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Context Is Everything. NAACP’s Jealous &#039;Snookered&#039; Himself</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87899348</link>
<description>Should hear him right now...&amp;quot;Some blogger, Andrew Breibert or something, I don&amp;#039;t know if he was provided the whole tape, or if he edited it, or..I don&amp;#039;t know much about this..but, but, but&amp;quot;...Obama is to blame..laughable </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87899348</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Context Is Everything. NAACP’s Jealous &#039;Snookered&#039; Himself</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87875876</link>
<description>&amp;quot;You tell me as a reporter how CNN put on a person today who purported to be the farmer&amp;rsquo;s wife? What did you do to find out whether or not that was the actual farmer&amp;rsquo;s wife? I mean, if you&amp;rsquo;re going to accuse me of a falsehood, tell me where you&amp;rsquo;ve confirmed that had this incident happened 24 years ago. [...]     You&amp;rsquo;re going off of her word that the farmer&amp;rsquo;s wife is the farmer&amp;rsquo;s wife?&amp;quot;  Andrew Breibert July 20, 2010   HAHAHA....Andrew...Fail </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/laborunionreport/2010/07/21/context-is-everything-naacps-jealous-snookered-himself/#IDComment87875876</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Breitbart: It’s Not About Shirley Sherrod; It’s About NAACP Attacking Tea Party</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/breitbart-its-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment87865591</link>
<description>Always convenient to change the story when you are caught being a fraud. If Andrew was trying to frame the NAACP, he should have said so in the first place. Backtrack = failure </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/07/21/breitbart-its-not-about-shirley-sherrod-its-about-naacp-attacking-tea-party/#IDComment87865591</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>