gdp's Comments

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:00:06 +0000

no, that is 2.0.1 baseband firmware for 3G, quite old.

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:46 +0000

yeah, but they used the JerrySIM exploit to do that, which has been fixed since after the 1.45.00 baseband.

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:22:12 +0000

to those that gave him thumbs down: unless I missed something, it seems he was making a joke, an allusion to a score in the south park movie

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:18:27 +0000

it's out, check http://redsn0w.com/

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:23:12 +0000

if they were able do use your bootstrapper idea there, then that would indicate that they could run unsigned code at boot, in which they could just use a patched iboot :) unfortunately, that is not the case.

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:14:44 +0000

afaik devteam doesn't normally moderate comments as Zibri did that and they don't want to e viewed that way, trying to "censor" people. (most people's comments, apparently mine get moderated though o.O but other people say that theirs aren't)

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:48:10 +0000

484159204755595320492043414E205459504520494E2048455820544F4F204F4D472044555A20544841 54204D41454B204D4520434F4F4C204C45494B2055204755595A3F3F

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:54:55 +0000

incorrect. dev could have their tool send a 2.1.1 iBEC or iBSS to the device after telling you to put it into DFU mode, the device would accept it since it is a signed apple firmware file, and there you go. and before you ask, no, it will not downgrade you, or anything on the device.

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:13:44 +0000

hah, don't worry about it. I made a post on my blog about it and now i have jesus himself spamming it :)

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:21:18 +0000

just to confirm, you all realize that he was making a joke, right?

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:19:03 +0000

2.1.1 = can be done via recovery, program can be fully automatic 2.2 = must be done via dfu and you will need a 2.1.1 ipsw, but is still possible note that I do not have redsn0w, I am simply telling you what _can_ be done with the exploit.

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:17:40 +0000

it kind of worries me that a few people have replied saying that they have done this :/

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:15:41 +0000

its a sha1 of a decrypted iboot, and the significance of this is that they would need access to the aes engine to be able to decrypt the KBAG, so basically, this proves that they can run unsigned code :)

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:13:57 +0000

you could also say it came late :P

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:12:12 +0000

A userland exploit would never work in 2.x. it is an exploit in iBoot 2.1.

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:10:30 +0000

afaik the hardware it relies on is exclusive to the iPod Touch 2G, although I could be wrong, even though nothing has ever been said about this being in an iPhone or iPod Touch 1G

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:33:10 +0000

@Tintifax: the iPod and iPhone are very common. the thing about this is that it is exclusive to iPod Touch 2G 2.1 firmware, and none other, because it seems to be smth that Apple used for diagnostic / testing and just plain did not remove x)

blog.iphone-dev.org :

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:30:57 +0000

@qawsed: 1. it was fixed in 2.2, so apple already knows about it and will not let it be loaded on any future iPhone 2. it would be just mean to not share such a thing, since it is less of an exploit and more of an Apple uh-oh.

blog.iphone-dev.org : ,2

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:39:17 +0000

him, not her.

blog.iphone-dev.org : ,2

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:37:02 +0000

I have a better idea. Legally, as long as they are not blocking the entrance, they can set up a table with a laptop and use yellowsn0w to unlock people for free. If they attempt to kick the people off for trespassing, they are covered as long as you say it is a form of protest