<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/558511</link>
		<description>Comments by Christopher</description>
<item>
<title>Paul O&#039;Flaherty : VIMICRO USB PC 301x Drivers</title>
<link>http://pauloflaherty.com/2006/10/14/vimicro-usb-pc-301x-drivers/#IDComment28565751</link>
<description>Paul,  I blogged a few years back as I had the same camera and, having lost the driver disc, I could only find that bloody dowan site (even got a message from the site admin complaining that she had to pay for her hosting somehow and she couldn&amp;#039;t afford to host the (tiny!) file - how tightfisted must she be?! If I ran a web site which became wildly popular, I&amp;#039;d just stick some ads up to pay for it! Some people just don&amp;#039;t get the interwebs.)  Anyway, I blogged separately about this camera and its troublesome drivers, and included a link to Vimicro&amp;#039;s own site where they had a driver detection and download utility: &lt;a href=&quot;http://kerblam.co.uk/2008/01/vimicro-usb-pc-camera-301x-drivers-free.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://kerblam.co.uk/2008/01/vimicro-usb-pc-camer...&lt;/a&gt;  I notice from Google Analytics that my own post from 2008 still gets a LOT of traffic, and your site ranks more highly than mine. The final irony is that the dead-teddybears.com site is actually no longer around - it&amp;#039;s being cybersquatted! So your original post&amp;#039;s link is now obsolete. Could you (for the sake of the interwebs) update your original post with a newer, functional link?   All the best :) Christopher </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://pauloflaherty.com/2006/10/14/vimicro-usb-pc-301x-drivers/#IDComment28565751</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Review: Terminator Salvation Lacks Humanity</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/review-terminator-salvation-lacks-humanity.php#IDComment23266332</link>
<description>Some (at the very least) BARELY plausible storytelling would be a nice start. And a slightly less messy and unresolved script. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/review-terminator-salvation-lacks-humanity.php#IDComment23266332</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Film School Rejects : Review: Terminator Salvation Lacks Humanity</title>
<link>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/review-terminator-salvation-lacks-humanity.php#IDComment23266142</link>
<description>Yes, YES, YES!!! I watched this film tonight (UK opening night) and felt hollow and unsatisfied afterwards.  Couldn&amp;#039;t adequately express my dissatisfaction (I&amp;#039;m not good at explaining why films suck, I just know a pisspoor piece of work when I sit and watch one). Thank you for crystalising every poor point of this film for me! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/reviews/review-terminator-salvation-lacks-humanity.php#IDComment23266142</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>