<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/316168</link>
		<description>Comments by chrisinatl</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Larry David&#039;s &#039;Piss Christ&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/10/27/larry-davids-piss-christ/#IDComment40967495</link>
<description>I think perhaps you could have been a little clearer about what happened in the show.  Larry did not piss on the picture intentionally - it was merely an accidental &amp;quot;splash back&amp;quot;.  I am a very conservative Christian and this did not offend me in the least.  I think this is a bit of nitpicking.  I didn&amp;#039;t particularly find this portion of the episode to be very funny but it wasn&amp;#039;t due to my considering offensive because I did not.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/10/27/larry-davids-piss-christ/#IDComment40967495</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama calls white policeman who arrested scholar</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99L06280#IDComment28244442</link>
<description>Hmm...if it weren&amp;#039;t for the press obsessing this tool wouldn&amp;#039;t be prezbo right now. While he has spent most of his time proving what a novice he is and walking this nation down a dangerous path he is now about to find himself barking up the tree that got him there. If they start trashing the media that made him he is further doomed. It seems pretty clear to me - media is hurting financially thanks to new web media, along comes a celebrity running for president - they need ratings so glorification begins. Said celebrity takes office, starts screwing up, losing his own party support and sees his approval numbers begin to fade. The media takes note and wakes up to the fact that their ratings will maintain if they slowly turn the screw as his numbers drop. Now let&amp;#039;s just hope we can get back to journalism where they spout facts not adulation. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99L06280#IDComment28244442</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : White House qualifies Obama remark about arrest</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99K9Q001#IDComment28123527</link>
<description>What is most interesting about the story is that we know by know that BO likes to prescreen his questions at &amp;quot;press conferences&amp;quot; - interesting he chose this completely irrelevant question unless he is trying to make a point.  I guess this way they can say that he took questions on something other than the softball health care disaster he was selling. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99K9Q001#IDComment28123527</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Atlantis astronauts capture Hubble Space Telescope</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D985G04G0#IDComment21390283</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m no scientist but it seems that if they can grab a school bus sized object in orbit would it be that big a deal to try to clean up some of the junk left floating around? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D985G04G0#IDComment21390283</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Couple\&#039;s \&#039;buy black\&#039; experiment becomes a movement</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D984SLN80#IDComment21324704</link>
<description>Seriously - what is this non-stop attempt to prevent the integration everyone was begging for not so long ago.  We all know this is a huge double standard that exists but is it really acceptable to just write it off as some thinly veiled community support mechanism?  Who really gives a damn about the color of the person at the store?  Oh, wait  apparently a growing number of black folk who have no stone or racism cast at them.  Many years ago I started calling this growing phenomenon &amp;quot;extragation&amp;quot; since clearing being integrated isn&amp;#039;t on the mind of some. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D984SLN80#IDComment21324704</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Mexico City shuts down taco stands amid swine flu</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97SCBL81#IDComment20195492</link>
<description>Sadly, taco stands or not -  there will most likely be some diarrhea doing down tonight.   Making a guess: in 1 week this Swine Flu is a non topic. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97SCBL81#IDComment20195492</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Capitol briefly evacuated, White House locked down</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97OVSF80#IDComment19824243</link>
<description>I might have made my own oops and not told the Senate.  There has to be a better way to get term limits in place I suppose. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97OVSF80#IDComment19824243</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Somali pirates were \&#039;untrained\&#039; teenagers: US</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.31df982b8ef5619e88e7984ec0013344.501#IDComment18687509</link>
<description>The solution - decoy.  Since they promise &amp;quot;revenge&amp;quot; on US and French ships let&amp;#039;s put a fleet of &amp;quot;cargo&amp;quot; ships that are loaded with rocket launchers, torpedos and US Navy crews in plain clothes and play catch me if you can.  Figure by the time they catch on that they can&amp;#039;t win we can take out a good 10-15% of the active ones as well as their ships.  That should serve as a little lesson at least.  The solution is so easy it is impossible to not do this - they wouldn&amp;#039;t need to worry about political and legal fallout.  If the pirates try to capture or attack one of the ships - game on and game over. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.31df982b8ef5619e88e7984ec0013344.501#IDComment18687509</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama to seek $83.4 billion for Iraq, Afghan wars</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97F3U5O0#IDComment18449329</link>
<description>well, well, well...another shining example of getting suckered in by campaign deception.  a crying shame that 99.5% of those who feel for it hook, line and sinker will be oblivious to this.  They will retort with &amp;quot;well Bush spent money on the war and you nut job whacko republicans didn&amp;#039;t complain&amp;quot; as part of the continued pathetic effort to save their egos in the face of the disaster they have put in office.  I personally say the money has to be spent to finish the job so I won&amp;#039;t argue with that logic just like I didn&amp;#039;t argue with it under Bush (consistency democrats - look into it).  Can I call supporters of Obama warmongers now?  Should we try Obama as a war criminal now dearest supporters?  I&amp;#039;m afraid it would be cruel to do so as they are suffering the fate of their hyped up dillusion enought already. Hopefully a handful have realized how gullible this man is making them look and they can save the error of their ways in the future. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97F3U5O0#IDComment18449329</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Pentagon believes US crew in control of ship</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97ECKC80#IDComment18367069</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Pentagon believes US crew in control of ship&amp;quot; - that is code for they quickly paid the ransom so there wouldn&amp;#039;t have to be a &amp;quot;tough&amp;quot; decision in public for prez-0. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97ECKC80#IDComment18367069</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US newspaper owners are &quot;mad as hell&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bbd53#IDComment18366505</link>
<description>You know what is coming right?  Pelosi has already started the chatter - Newspaper Bailout - coming to a congressional district near you very soon.  There is no way they will let the papers continue to drop.  They should have no interest in the paper business but they&amp;#039;ll stick their hands in with a couple of other appendages.  It is actually a bit disturbing on a larger scale - first this Administration wants to keep their hands in the banks.  Next the auto industry.  Coming soon - the newspaper business.  I&amp;#039;m not sure I believe the big O when he says he doesn&amp;#039;t support the Fairness Doctrine so eventually the airwaves will have further government involvement.  If we had said this 2 years ago it would seem like a conspiracy nut job off his rocker but look around now and see what has begun? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bbd53#IDComment18366505</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Somali pirates hijack ship; 20 Americans aboard</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97EB8F00#IDComment18365622</link>
<description>If nothing happens (still) about the pirate issues over there it will be a shame.  Hasn&amp;#039;t anyone in Washington read Rainbox Six?  The answer to the problem lies right there for this and other hostage situations.  This story will be squashed by the end of the day because the big O is supposed to make the decision on a dog when he returns from his European Honeymoon.  You know how they are going to handle this faux Camelot they are trying to spin on the Obamas.  Fashion and pets are much more important that the continuing decline of our political and economic systems. Odds that the dog is named &amp;quot;Rush&amp;quot;? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97EB8F00#IDComment18365622</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US gives 50,000 dlrs for quake-hit Italy</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.15148f36e80f2222604c174cd120fa19.381#IDComment18257603</link>
<description>I think some of the Obamabots are missing the point.  It would be better to send $0 than 50K.  Sending 50K after refusing to accept some of the TARP money (plus interest) back from banks ready to repay just reeks of trying to make a statement.  A bizarre, confusing statement but a statement.  I guess we should be getting used to those.  I couldn&amp;#039;t quit my job for 6 months and live on 50K. 50K (USD) may come close to buying a couple of slices of pizza and a coke for the workers but that is about it. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.15148f36e80f2222604c174cd120fa19.381#IDComment18257603</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : </title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D974NJAO0#IDComment17577052</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m so tired of hearing about the &amp;quot;inheritance&amp;quot; nonsense.  For starters he was a member of the lunactic guild that helped create the mess.  The most important piece is this - for months we heard about the brilliant plans he would put forth to save us from their poorly made decisions.  Where is this brilliance now?  Buried under a pile of excuses and blame as always.  This tax credit was nothing more than a symbolic attempt to convince his followers that he was not a pathological liar just like the rest of them.  At best this tax credit helps offset the increased cost that will be paying for the new taxes that will be passed on to the consumer as business taxes increase.  The math works like this: increase taxes by eliminating the Bush tax cuts and cut them a smaller amount so he can look like a hero to those who are getting their news at 11 on their local TV stations and have no clue as to what is really going on. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D974NJAO0#IDComment17577052</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama: Economic crisis \&#039;not as bad as we think\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96SP30G5#IDComment16859413</link>
<description>Of course things aren&amp;#039;t as bad as they seemed today. He is writing a crap budget with a Pelosi inspired party plan for a new stimulus/spending package. He wants to convince us the sky isn&amp;#039;t falling today so we&amp;#039;ll stop be critical of the massive spending. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96SP30G5#IDComment16859413</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iraqi says he threw shoes at Bush to restore pride</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96EQIV00#IDComment15501954</link>
<description>(cont....)He could then go on a bender and spend this stimulus at the local market (buy local!) where he will purchase an extra can of garbonzo beans and a lotto ticket. He could then win the lottery and buy the shoe company that he works for using some assumed identity that he bought on E-bay. After the small business starts realizing substantial losses due to increased overhead cost due to his shop being required to go union and shortening consumer demand he will find his business is gone with the exception of a warehouse full of shoes with nobody to throw them at except himself. He then learns to juggle shoes and makes his way to Broadway but that is an entirely different story. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96EQIV00#IDComment15501954</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iraqi says he threw shoes at Bush to restore pride</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96EQIV00#IDComment15501929</link>
<description>Wonder what would happen if he threw his Air Jordans at Obama?  BO would probably reject that sneaker back in his face, go the free throw line and nail the 2 fer.  Afterward Al-Zeidi could be charged with a hate crime and be labeled a racist/terrorist, sent to Gitmo but then be redirected since it is closing.  Since the CA prisons are having to release prisoners due to overcrowding thanks to the ACLU lawsuits and budget cutbacks he would then just be released into the wild.  He may spend a few weeks working an odd job here or there, before landing a gig making shoes for minimum wage on an non-union assembly line.  He&amp;#039;ll be responsible for those little plastic tips on the laces (known to those in the biz as &amp;quot;aglets&amp;quot; which is ironic because that was his 2nd wifes name). Shortly he will receive a tax incentive of $13 effectively doubling his weekly income. (continued....) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96EQIV00#IDComment15501929</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iraqi says he threw shoes at Bush to restore pride</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96EQIV00#IDComment15500598</link>
<description>Why do my comments keep disappearing?  Sheesh.... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96EQIV00#IDComment15500598</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iraqi says he threw shoes at Bush to restore pride</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96EQIV00#IDComment15500148</link>
<description>Wonder what would happen if he threw his Air Jordans at Obama?  BO would probably reject that beyatch back in his face, go the free throw line and nail the 2 fer.  Afterward Al-Zeidi could be charged with a hate crime and be labeled a racist/terrorist, sent to Gitmo but then be redirected since it is closing.  Since the CA prisons are having to release prisoners due to overcrowding thanks to the ACLU lawsuits and budget cutbacks he would then just be released into the wild.  He may spend a few weeks working an odd job here or there, before landing a gig making shoes for minimum wage on an non-union assembly line.  He&amp;#039;ll be responsible for those little plastic tips on the laces (known to those in the biz as &amp;quot;aglets&amp;quot; which is ironic because that was his 2nd wifes name). Shortly he will receive a tax incentive of $13 effectively doubling his weekly income.... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96EQIV00#IDComment15500148</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : California to begin layoff proceedings today</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96DF7V80#IDComment15344733</link>
<description>Here are some tips that may help resolve the problem California.  1) Stop wasteful spending.  Stop trying to keep people from relying on themselves.  Teach accountability by example rather than enabling people to be reliant on someone else to get what they need. 2) Contact Barbra Streisand.  She has frequently spoken openly about the fact that she (and other celebs) think taxes should be higher and it is our civic duty.  I bet between her and Spielberg alone they could work a pretty big complimentary donation (not tax deductable of course) that could put a pretty big dent in the shortfall.  I&amp;#039;d bet there would even be a considerable contribution from plenty of other celebs that would be willing to put their money where their mouths are to save Eden.  Combine these 2 elements and you are on the road to recovery. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96DF7V80#IDComment15344733</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>