Buick

Buick

56p

290 comments posted · 0 followers · following 1

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Vote for leaders who u... · 0 replies · 0 points

Jeff,

You have too many opinions you equate as facts for a serious rebuttal, so I won't.

I just wanted anyone who reads these posts to see it for themselves. Thank you!

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Judges make rulings, b... · 1 reply · -2 points

The Iowa Supreme...protected a minority from the tyranny of a benighted, bigoted majority

ONLY, if sodomy is a right! (and it isn't)

Please justify your opinion with the genetic science that gender and skin color has demonstrated.

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Judges make rulings, b... · 0 replies · +2 points

Question,

If all the Iowa Supreme Court did was strike down a law they considered unconstitutional,
exactly how did same sex marriage become legal without legislative input and without violating the traditional and customary practice of local government?

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Judges make rulings, b... · 0 replies · 0 points

cc, I know you wouldn't want to mislead anyone, but exactly what law did the Iowa legislature pass that allows same sex marriage?

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Court ruling no threat... · 0 replies · +1 points

"you tell me I have no rights because you disagree with my spritual views"

You misconstrued my statement. If you reject the foundational premise of American government ie, our rights come from God, then your disagreement isn't with me but rather the FOUNDERS!

Invoking 'equal protection' may give you warm legalistic fuzzies, but it has no meaning until you define what it is you want to protect and provided of course if your right falls under the Founders definition.

See there, we can talk without resorting to name calling.

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Court ruling no threat... · 0 replies · -1 points

Knowing how to resist degenerate change is a very useful skill to possess. I agree.

Do you see how your statement means nothing unless you qualify the 'change'?

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Court ruling no threat... · 0 replies · -1 points

My little clique? Seems to me you're in the 2% little clique.

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Vote for leaders who u... · 1 reply · -1 points

Seems you reject the Founders words. Is it because they clearly acknowledge God?
Whether you like it or not (and it appears you don't), your LEGITIMATE rights do indeed come from God. Don't let it upset you. Just because you're an atheist doesn't mean you can't enjoy the God given rights all Americans enjoy, no matter how small a minority you represent! That's the beauty of Judeo-Christian tolerance, we're not afraid of you having your opinion, it's just that we resent a 2% minority running the government.
Remember that equal status in our political system is not the same as equal power. That silly idea the Founders penned about "the consent of the governed" - that's in the Declaration too.

You're also quick to demand 'equality', a moral term.
Not very solid ground for an evolutionist. say what?

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Vote for leaders who u... · 2 replies · -1 points

I'll not put words in the writer's mouth, so this answer is mine.

# 1 The Founders already told you your rights come from God. Do you reject that statement in the Declaration of Independence? If so, you place yourself outside it's protection unless you mount a campaign to repeal that portion of the Declaration. OR GET JUDGES TO IGNORE IT.
If you claim rights apart from His revealed will ie, "the laws of Nature and (the laws) of Nature's God" (also in the Declaration) then they are by definition NOT rights and NOT protected under our form of government.

15 years ago @ GazetteOnline.com - Vote for leaders who u... · 0 replies · 0 points

You also falsely claim America was founded as a secular nation without an iota of evidence.
Perhaps you missed the first paragraph of the Declaration which states,
" When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them,..."

Your job is to reconcile the word 'secular' with "the laws of Nature and (the laws) of Nature's God"
without your revisionist sources this time.