<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/739463</link>
		<description>Comments by brilliance</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Diane Sawyer begins at ABC\&#039;s `World News\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48552884</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been watching Gibson since Couric took over (she&amp;#039;s hopeless) and was not expecting much from Diane.  The new intro was nice and as I watched her I had a positive view--based mainly on what specials she&amp;#039;s done in international interviews. However, as I watched one of the first segments about the health care bill and the supposed &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; answers to viewer questions, I realized that she&amp;#039;s no more &amp;quot;independent&amp;quot; than Gibson.  To say that &amp;quot;you can keep your insurance as it is&amp;quot; without reference to the new market forces that will morph all insurance plans is dishonest--which I guess means there&amp;#039;s no real change from Gibson except the skirt and a bit more body movement while talking.  I was left wondering where can I turn get a compressed view of the day&amp;#039;s news without without the spin and without reading it online. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CO1A080#IDComment48552884</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>