en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/535404 Comments by bobbyk57 http://tv.breitbart.com/troops-boo-kathy-griffin-for-bristol-palin-fat-jokes/#IDComment116514488 Nancy who? Where is Bob Hope when the troops need him? Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:44:21 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/troops-boo-kathy-griffin-for-bristol-palin-fat-jokes/#IDComment116514488 http://tv.breitbart.com/howard-dean-beck-is-racist-hate-monger-followers-are-lost-souls/#IDComment97773028 I love it when Dean opens his mouth. He clearly doesn't understand statistics. Dean, let me clue you in on something: if there were 300,000 people there there's a multiple of at least 4 that weren't there that wanted to be, and THAT, my friend, is a significant political statement. Once again, come November, you'll realize you were wrong. One more point - when has Glenn Beck EVER been a hate monger? Clearly, this guy (Dean) - and people like him - don't understand the difference between disagreeing with ideology and hating someone. I don't hate Obama, I just can't stand his politics. Am I supposed to sit back and say I do? Are we, as a people, supposed to sit back and just watch our country go down the crapper and act like we enjoy it? If we did that, then we would be like the "wondering souls" he so eloquently speaks of in this clip. Enjoy your time in the limelight Mr. Dean - it will be short lived! Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:26:38 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/howard-dean-beck-is-racist-hate-monger-followers-are-lost-souls/#IDComment97773028 http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-i-am-absolutely-committed-to-fiscal-responsibility/#IDComment97770586 Fiscal responsibility? You mean you and your family are going to cut back the number of lavish vacations next year? Nice. What a moron - and I don't use that term loosely or often. The only thing he does well is blame everything on everyone else. Is it November yet? Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:55:36 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-i-am-absolutely-committed-to-fiscal-responsibility/#IDComment97770586 http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/breaking-air-america-ceasing-live-programming-this-afternoon/#IDComment53233796 Air Who? What was that? ;-) I expect Maddow and Olbermann to be next..... Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:04:20 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/breaking-air-america-ceasing-live-programming-this-afternoon/#IDComment53233796 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D228180&show_article=1#IDComment50603121 I guess even he knows he's done enough damage to our great country. But, it's not like he hasn't padded his bank account over the years.... this is great news. Good riddance Mr. Dodd... Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:07:18 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D228180&show_article=1#IDComment50603121 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment37957534 Well, looks like the Nobel committee has been hoodwinked too. I hope the president enjoys this moment of glory before everyone figures him out. He's nothing more than a narcissistic apologist who has no original thoughts. He's better suited to replace Dr. Phil on the Oprah show than to be the president of the United States. This is a very shallow human being who obviously without his handlers would not have an original point of view. Why do you think he has not made a decision on Afghanistan?. It's because he is cluesless as to what to do. He talks a big story (you remember all the hope and change rhetoric), but when push comes to shove, he's a spineless coward who thinks his words will produce victory. Meanwhile the reality of what he's actually done is ruining life as we know it. His views have been crafted by radical leftists, and he's their front man. Listen to him stumble over his words whenever the teleprompter fails...I thought Bush was bad, but this guy is peerless when it comes to being a moron. Bask in your glory Mr. President...it will be short lived. Of that I'm certain, and the polls bear that out.... Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:50:25 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment37957534 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99TKCRG0#IDComment29865101 JL - clearly these idiots don't understand what the "democratic process" really is. Their definition of the democratic process is this: Here's our plan, agree with it or your anti-American. If you disagree with them you'll be called numerous names (usually prefaced with the words "right wing extremists". If this piece of legislation goes through I will have totally lost any faith in the true democratic process...these people are not our representatives - they represent only themselves and their special interests...sickening...Keep the faith JL.... Fri, 7 Aug 2009 04:39:31 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99TKCRG0#IDComment29865101 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99TKCRG0#IDComment29864153 TX - Couldn't agree with you more. We need a good revolution - and I'm not talking about where people have to die. I'm talking about an idea revolution. One of the other writers said it well - political correctness needs to be damned. Let's speak it like it is. I'm so sick of hearing these Obama mouthpieces go out there and try selling us a bill of goods when they've never even read the bill. Let's keep the pressure on and we'll get our revolution! God bless you! Fri, 7 Aug 2009 04:23:23 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99TKCRG0#IDComment29864153 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99TKCRG0#IDComment29863571 Harry - The RNC has not contacted me nor has it asked me to be part of an organized opposition group against health care reform, health insurance reform, or whatever you guys are calling it now to try to gloss over what it really is. I am, however, an intelligent, and concerned American citizen, capable of thinking for himself, and what I'm thinking right now is that this is the wrong direction for America to be headed. We have the worst economy in decades, worst unemployment rate in decades (and getting worse), the worst Federal deficit-ever, and you guys want to add even more to that? Let's really fix some of these other issues first, then worry about expanding Government. Why does Obama want to push this through so fast? Because he knows that once people (all the people) figure out what a piece of crap the program is, they'll rebel and you guys will be out of power. He's right about that -you need to do it now or it's not going to get done. So we oppose your view? So what? Isn't that democracy in action? If our so called representatives aren't representing us then we have a right to have our voices heard. And that is what you are seeing at these town hall meetings. For you to imply that we need to be ushered to the town hall and given words to speak by the RNC is ludicrous-those are ACORN tactics.....Wake up Harry - we are the real deal and whether you are a (R) or a (D) we collectively do not like what you and your people are doing. Do we need to evaluate how we can make our health care system better and more equitable? I won't deny that. But stop trying to force this ill-conceived piece of crap legislation down our throats! P.S. Me nor anyone I know are carrying around swastikas - that' just another baseless, fabricated lie that Boxer, et al., can get away with because nobody is calling them on it. Shameful and disgusting, but politics as usual for you guys... Fri, 7 Aug 2009 04:13:36 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99TKCRG0#IDComment29863571 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28932705 Finally, we can agree on something: Obama should never have opened his mouth. And that is our whole point. By the way, Crowley hardly caused this to escalate by asking simply for an ID. Gates allowed it to escalate by now providing it when asked professionally and courteously by Crowley. Finally, I doubt anyone would have been screaming if Obama had "snubbed" the beer deal. Maybe in your world you'd like to think that would have happened, but not in mine. Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:31:37 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28932705 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28932321 Why do you hate law enforcement officers doing their job by the book. I'm inclined to go along with Coyote12's comments. By arguing semantics, you are clearly missing the entire point that most of us are trying to make. Whether right or wrong, Crowley is clearly not a racist as evidenced by both his actions and statements made by his multi-racial colleagues on his behalf. Clearly, President Obama made a knee-jerk, ill-informed and highly volatile comment, and now that the facts are out he needs to do what's right and apologize. I would say the same thing had this happened with George Bush, Bill Clinton or FDR in office. It was an un-presidential, ignorant and stupidly stated remark. That's our point. Nuff said. Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:28:10 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28932321 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28931512 Madame Delphi - If you want to be taken seriously, you should cite your sources. The beauty of these types of blogs is that people like you can say anything you want and never have to cite facts. That puts you in the same category as the conspiracy theorists, bigfoot hunters, UFO watchers, etc. I wish for once, we could have a civil conversation without bringing politics into it. We can agree to disagree about the semantics of the case in question, and that's okay. We can still do that in America. But when we start making up stuff in an effort to paint once side or the other a certain way, it's wrong. You are wrong to make these types of comments without evidence to back them up. Do I doubt that there is some truth to your comments? Not really because there are morons everywhere who want to kill people. That is a sad, but true reality. But when you start classifying me along with them just because we have opposing points of view you're out of line - period. Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:17:28 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28931512 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28931080 You are wrong. I could care less who the the alleged "victim" is. Black, white, hispanic, republican or democrat. This is not the issue here at all. At issue is that a person did not peacefully comply with a legitimate request from a law enforcement officer , and as a result race-baiting ensued - plain and simple. To bring politics into this conversation as though it's a republican versus democrat issue is just plain ignorant. Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:11:52 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28931080 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28925286 You're right that he "eventually" showed his ID, and that's the lesson to be learned here. Had he complied with the police officer's initial request, the whole thing never would have made the news. On your other point about police entering his home, the report does not indicate that they EVER tried to enter, rather they asked him to come out because at that point he had not shown his ID. The officers followed protocol. If there is someone who had been witnessed as possibly breaking into a home, and it turns out to be his home, show the ID and it's done. This clearly did not happen. That's my point. We can argue semantics all day, but the bottom line is Officer Crowley was doing his job by the book, and the professor was the one who got belligerent and out of hand. Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:57:22 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28925286 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28922754 Evildoer - I believe the facts show that he did not show his ID upon request, but rather made a comment (I'm paraphrasing) about "do you know who your messin' with". Had he complied with the police officer's initial request the whole thing would never have made the news. Gates should have thanked Officer Crowley for doing the right thing by helping protect his home and neighborhood from possible vandals. Instead, he turned it into a racial profiling issue, and as a result, he should apologize. Not showing an ID card until after things got heated up is clearly, in this case, an attempt at race-baiting. Anyone who can't see that isn't looking very hard. Thanks, Bobby Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:25:32 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28922754 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28922260 Madame Delphi - With all due respect you are missing my salient point: That Obama made a very non-presidential, ill-informed, racist comment and--although the facts of the case are clear--has yet to apologize as he should. Regardless of who initiated the beer get together, I stand by all of my previous comments. Thanks, Bobby Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:19:07 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28922260 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28901258 Clearly Obama is using this as a smoke screen to turn a very important and telling issue into a light-hearted joke. It's pathetic. If I were Officer Crowley, I would have politely declined this invitation until an apology was given. If it weren't bad enough that the president of the United States weighed in with his own personal comments without the facts, it's even worse that he won't apologize-in public-to the officer now that we do have the facts, and he was clearly wrong. If Obama would stop acting stupidly on this, he could do the right thing, and begin to repair the damage he caused by making his community director-like comments. President Obama, grow up, get rid of this stupid beer-drinking, taxpayer money-wasting smokescreen, apologize publicly for your erroneous judgment of Officer Crowley, and commend him for his professionalism and dedication to his community's safety. Maybe then we can begin to move on from this. Oh, one more thing: He could also use this as an opportunity to teach our young people the proper way to respect law enforcement officers when they ask for identification. You're right Mr. President - this is a teachable moment. Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:07:54 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99OSPC00#IDComment28901258 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D984BCN00#IDComment21281340 Well said James. Here's my take on it: They asked a question, she gave an honest answer. If she would have given them the answer they wanted/expected, then she would be a liar. So, apparently they are more interested in a Miss California who lies, rather than one who has values and stands up for them. I don't know about you guys, but I'm getting fed up with all the PC nonsense. If you don't want a "controversial" answer, then don't ask a stupid controversial question. As for Miss California - you are my hero! You go girl!!! Bobby Tue, 12 May 2009 04:36:19 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D984BCN00#IDComment21281340