<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1910919</link>
		<description>Comments by bmrepete</description>
<item>
<title>Big Peace : Ron Paul Panders to Anti-Semitism in Michigan</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/bshapiro/2012/02/29/ron-paul-panders-to-anti-semitism-in-michigan/#IDComment304901687</link>
<description>The Ron Paul campaign had nothing to do with this. It was done by a regional volunteer by the name of Todd Weston.         It helps to get the facts before claiming someone&amp;#039;s campaign did something. You guys get in a tizzy when the libs do this to one of your candidates.    &amp;quot;The flyers were the brainchild of Weston, who had the campaign literature translated into Arabic by students at a nearby college. He pitched the plan to the campaign, but ultimately made the flyers himself, he said.&amp;quot;      &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/patdollard.com\/2012\/02\/ron-pauls-arabic-campaign-flyers\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://patdollard.com/2012/02/ron-pauls-arabic-ca...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/bshapiro/2012/02/29/ron-paul-panders-to-anti-semitism-in-michigan/#IDComment304901687</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : 29-Feb-12 World View: China&#039;s Military Buildup Continues &#039;Unabated&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/jxenakis/2012/02/29/29-feb-12-world-view-chinas-military-buildup-continues-unabated/#IDComment304566927</link>
<description>&amp;quot;China&amp;rsquo;s plans for total war with the United States appear to be coming to fruition, and an attack within 12-18 months is a reasonable expectation. &amp;quot;  Another reason we should not be thinking about attacking Iran right now.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/jxenakis/2012/02/29/29-feb-12-world-view-chinas-military-buildup-continues-unabated/#IDComment304566927</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : How Reagan Would Handle Iran</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment304191487</link>
<description>You sure have a thing for rectal orifices don&amp;#039;t you? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment304191487</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : How Reagan Would Handle Iran</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment303915048</link>
<description>You are right Democrats like to start wars to.  I shouldn&amp;#039;t limited my statement to neocons. How about I just expand it to politicians in general. Does that make you feel better?  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment303915048</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : How Reagan Would Handle Iran</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment303908877</link>
<description>Ahmadinejad and the mullahs talk a lot and blame all their problems on the US and Israel to distract the Iranian people and give them someone to hate and fear. But Iran is not invading countries and slaughtering millions as Germany and Japan were.        I am simply proposing that we cool our heads before plunging headlong into another war. If we could stop them from getting a nuke by some airstrikes I would be all for it. But many officials in our intelligence agencies have stated that airstrikes will only push it back a year or two. A ground invasion would likely be required to ensure that they do not get a nuclear weapon. A ground invasion would be very nasty, with lots of American blood spilled.       I am sorry. I  just do not believe that America will turn into a sharia dominated caliphate if we don&amp;#039;t start a war with Iran because they might be trying to make a nuclear weapon.       I spent five years in the Army with over two years in Iraq watching my friends get blown up. What have you sacrificed?       Its a freaking comment on a blog and you are worried about a couple of misspelled words? Seriously? You replied in one big freaking paragraph. BTW I am making straight As in engineering school, not that you&amp;#039;ll likely believe me. My spelling may not be the greatest but I am great at math and physics.  Oh and since a lot of you probably don&amp;#039;t get off this site much it helps to do some reading elsewhere.   The US has has been worried about Iran making nukes for 30 years now.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/1108/Imminent-Iran-nuclear-threat-A-timeline-of-warnings-since-1979/Earliest-warnings-1979-84&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/1...&lt;/a&gt;  There isn&amp;#039;t even any real evidence that they are making a bomb.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/01/contrary-to-widespread-claims-there-is-no-evidence-that-iran-is-building-a-nuclear-weapon.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/01/contrary-t...&lt;/a&gt;  Oh and an Iran nuke probably wouldn&amp;#039;t be too much to be worried about.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/depsite-the-hysteria-experts-say-that-iran-poses-very-little-threat-to-the-west-or-israel.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/02/depsite-th...&lt;/a&gt;  Attacking them will likely increase the odds that they do make a bomb...   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/01/american-defense-and-intelligence-chiefs-attacking-iran-will-increase-odds-that-iran-will-build-a-nuclear-bomb.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/01/american-d...&lt;/a&gt;  Before you blow it off, that blog links to several sources.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment303908877</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : How Reagan Would Handle Iran</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment303369707</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The arms deals with Iran were open&amp;quot;     Really???      &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment303369707</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : How Reagan Would Handle Iran</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment303356045</link>
<description>Great idea! Lets just start another war! The neocons cant seem to get enough of sending our troops to war and  putting it on the Chinese credit card. People seem to have short memories. It wasn&amp;#039;t that long ago they they neocons were screaming that Iraq had WMDs and we had to do something about it IMMEDIATELY, or they world attack us or something...  Do you people actually believe that if Iran somehow does get a nuclear weapon that they will use it? Sure their crazy but are they too crazy to not realize that using a nuclear will solidify their end as a country? I mean seriously, they would be wiped off the map and they know it. Our saber rattling just spurs to try that much harder to try and get a nuclear weapon in order to deter us. They&amp;#039;ve seen us overthrow how many middle eastern countries in the last decade?  The Iranian leaders may be crazy and they like to talk mean about Israel but is it really worth it to start ANOTHER war?   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/lklayman/2012/02/27/how-reagan-would-handle-iran/#IDComment303356045</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum: JFK &#039;Church And State&#039; Speech Makes Me Throw Up</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-jfk-church-and-state-speech-makes-me-throw-up/#IDComment302490354</link>
<description>Exactly congress shall make no laws in favor or against any religions. And it&amp;#039;s libertarian, about as far as you can get from a progressive Marxist. I don&amp;#039;t like being told how to live my life from the left or the right.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-jfk-church-and-state-speech-makes-me-throw-up/#IDComment302490354</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum: JFK &#039;Church And State&#039; Speech Makes Me Throw Up</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-jfk-church-and-state-speech-makes-me-throw-up/#IDComment302386234</link>
<description>Sure doesn&amp;#039;t sound like that&amp;#039;s what he was talking about. Sounds like he is making the case that politicians can/should make decisions based upon their religious beliefs. What if his religious beliefs infringe upon my liberties? Or the liberties of another religion?  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-jfk-church-and-state-speech-makes-me-throw-up/#IDComment302386234</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum: JFK &#039;Church And State&#039; Speech Makes Me Throw Up</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-jfk-church-and-state-speech-makes-me-throw-up/#IDComment302364959</link>
<description>Saying things like this will ensure Obama&amp;#039;s reelection if Santorum somehow becomes the GOP candidate. Not everyone wants to live by whatever religious rules a president believes in.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-jfk-church-and-state-speech-makes-me-throw-up/#IDComment302364959</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum: If You Think Defense Spending Is Problem, You Need To Take Remedial Math </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-if-you-think-defense-spending-is-problem-you-need-to-take-remedial-math/#IDComment299945457</link>
<description>The usual insulting response from a neocon unwilling to look at facts and engage in an actual debate.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-if-you-think-defense-spending-is-problem-you-need-to-take-remedial-math/#IDComment299945457</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul: Protect Our Border Not Pakistan&#039;s</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-protect-our-border-not-pakistans/#IDComment299837925</link>
<description>Doesn&amp;#039;t this rhetoric remind you of the what the politicians were saying about Iraq? That turned out to be a disaster.    If Israel wants to take care of Iran let them, they are more than capable.I am just sick and tired of sending our troops to die for someone else&amp;#039;s war.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-protect-our-border-not-pakistans/#IDComment299837925</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul: Protect Our Border Not Pakistan&#039;s</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-protect-our-border-not-pakistans/#IDComment299747767</link>
<description>What are you 12? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-protect-our-border-not-pakistans/#IDComment299747767</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul: Protect Our Border Not Pakistan&#039;s</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-protect-our-border-not-pakistans/#IDComment299747555</link>
<description>Just hate that free speech don&amp;#039;t you? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-protect-our-border-not-pakistans/#IDComment299747555</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul: Protect Our Border Not Pakistan&#039;s</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-protect-our-border-not-pakistans/#IDComment299483549</link>
<description>Every heard of using nuclear weapons as a deterrent?    I know its crazy but put yourself in Iran&amp;#039;s shoes. The most powerful nation in the world invades and overthrows two of your closest neighbors, a nuclear weapon is a pretty powerful deterrent to insure that you aren&amp;#039;t overthrown as well. I know its hard to think outside the box but just try.    Here this might be easier. Imagine if we didn&amp;#039;t have the military and nuclear weapons that we do and a more powerful country came and invaded Canada and Mexico. Wouldn&amp;#039;t you be in favor of getting a nuke to assure the same didn&amp;#039;t happen to us?    Or you can just go ahead and call us ding bats and not attempt to engage in a logical debate. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-protect-our-border-not-pakistans/#IDComment299483549</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum: If You Think Defense Spending Is Problem, You Need To Take Remedial Math </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-if-you-think-defense-spending-is-problem-you-need-to-take-remedial-math/#IDComment299475276</link>
<description>What a neocon. We spend more on defense then the next 15 or so countries combined. We spend approximately 50% of the worlds total expenditure on defense, and unfortunately most of it is used to defend other countries does&amp;#039;t anyone see anything wrong with this? We could pull our troops home spend less on defense and get more bang for our buck.     Defense spending may only be 17% but it could be cut along with everything else.   Remedial math indeed... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-if-you-think-defense-spending-is-problem-you-need-to-take-remedial-math/#IDComment299475276</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Santorum: Satan Bad, Vote For Me</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/21/santorum-satan-bad-vote-for-me/#IDComment298553664</link>
<description>Wow....So everything just fell apart as soon as Obama got elected? You honestly don&amp;#039;t believe it was in shambles before he took office? To claim that everything was rosy before is laughable at best.  Don&amp;#039;t misread what I am saying. Obama is most definitely a disaster and has most likely exponentially accelerated our downfall.  But the big government Republicans in power during the Bush years, like Santorum, are responsible for this mess to. Their big spending, regulations, and incessant nation building failed. If they hadn&amp;#039;t been so terrible we probably wouldn&amp;#039;t be on the precipice and we likely wouldn&amp;#039;t have ended up with Obama as president.   You should really do some more reading, you sound quite ignorant.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/21/santorum-satan-bad-vote-for-me/#IDComment298553664</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Santorum: Satan Bad, Vote For Me</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/21/santorum-satan-bad-vote-for-me/#IDComment298469684</link>
<description>Really? What the politicians did back then is exactly why we are facing our current problems!  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/21/santorum-satan-bad-vote-for-me/#IDComment298469684</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Ron Paul On Iran: &#039;Let Israel Deal With It&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/awrhawkins/2012/02/08/ron-paul-on-iran-let-israel-deal-with-it/#IDComment287515534</link>
<description>Really buying into the fear mongering aren&amp;#039;t you?   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 01:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/awrhawkins/2012/02/08/ron-paul-on-iran-let-israel-deal-with-it/#IDComment287515534</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Ron Paul On Iran: &#039;Let Israel Deal With It&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/awrhawkins/2012/02/08/ron-paul-on-iran-let-israel-deal-with-it/#IDComment287479427</link>
<description>The drumbeat to go to war with Iran is getting old. Doesn&amp;#039;t this remind anyone of the arguments used to invade Iraq? And how did they that turn out for us? Iran will eventually get the bomb, airstrikes will only delay the inevitable. The only way to really stop them is to invade them like we did Iraq, only this time far more American blood would be shed. Does anyone really want to go through this again?   If Iran gets the bomb do you honestly think they would use it? If they did it would be the end of their regime.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 00:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/awrhawkins/2012/02/08/ron-paul-on-iran-let-israel-deal-with-it/#IDComment287479427</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>