gdp's Comments

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : The (Elusive) Middle Class Agenda - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:36:22 +0000

Had to drop by to note the passing of Tony Blankley. My heart goes out to his family and the crew of LRC. Here's Newt's comments which I ran across: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/08/newt-gin...

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:41:01 +0000

Thanks, but I have heard nothing back from the mods on what happened, so I am assuming they are either indifferent to the hacking of my account or happy about my departure. Either way, this appears to be a risky place to post. Good night, and good luck.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:36:38 +0000

My response to the hacking of my account: Somebody out there want to shut me up? DONE. I'm gone. Congratulations. You win. I wish all the rest of you the best of health and prosperity in the future. So long.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:34:46 +0000

They don't like me, perhaps?

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:29:00 +0000

SOMEBODY HACKED MY ACCOUNT. See that deleted post below? Not me. I didn't post the word 'test' which appears in the thread below it.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:21:43 +0000

WOW! Looks like my account was hacked. Somebody trying to shut me up? Anybody remember what this post was about?

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:02:42 +0000

Exactly! I think the fact that modern Republicans are SO FAR to the right of even the Libertarian founding father, Friedrich Hayek shows just how demented our country has become. Republicans are to the FAR RIGHT of Friedrich Hayek and Adam Smith, the founder of Capitalist thinking. They are off the deep end - beyond Capitalism, beyond Libertarianism. Modern Republicans and Tea Baggers are crazed, PREDATORY plutocrats.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:19:29 +0000

“There is no reason why, in a society which has reached the general level of wealth which ours has attained the first kind of security should not be guaranteed to all without endangering general freedom... security against severe physical deprivation (and) the certainty of a given minimum of sustenance for all... some minimum of food, shelter, and clothing, sufficient to preserve health and the capacity to work, can be assured to everybody. ... [T]he case for the state’s helping to organize a comprehensive system of social insurance is very strong.” - Friedrich Hayek, "The Road To Serfdom"

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 04:05:09 +0000

http://www.singlepayeraction.org/blog/wp-content/... Here comes that primary challenge!

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:54:23 +0000

I should make clear, that's not mine. That's the text of the Nader/West letter. I only posted all that because I could only find the original in a PDF.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:34:26 +0000

CONTINUED... This opportunity to revive and restore the progressive infrastructure of the Democratic Party must not be missed. A slate of Democratic candidates challenging the president’s substance and record is an historic opportunity. Certainly, President Obama will not be pleased to face a list of primary challengers, but the comfort of the incumbent is far less important than the vitality and strength of his party’s Progressive ideas and ideals. President Obama should emerge from the primary a stronger candidate as a result. This letter is sent to several dozen accomplished persons known to identify with the Democratic Party voting line for a variety of reasons. We ask that you consider several requests. First, would you consider being a slate candidate after due reflection beyond what may be an immediate no? History has illustrated greater discomforts, material sacrifices and other profiles of courage in our country’s past for a perceived major common good. Second, if you are not interested in joining as a candidate, would you add your name as an official endorsee of the slate proposal. All endorsements are made as individuals and organizational or institutional affiliations are for identification purposes only. Your endorsement will be a vital signal of support and will help in compiling the strongest slate of candidates possible when we send out the letter to the candidate list, yet to be finalized. Third, can you suggest accomplished people to contact who may be interested in joining the slate as a candidate in one of the following fields: labor, poverty, military and foreign policy, health insurance and care, the environment, financial regulation, civil and political rights/empowerment, and consumer protection. This can be yourself if you feel it would be appropriate. Candidates and endorsements will be accepted on a rolling basis. All submissions or additional questions and comments can be directed to Colin O’Neil at colinoneil@gmail.com or 703-599-3474. We appreciate your response. Thank you.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:28:28 +0000

CONTINUED... Thankfully, there is another option. This second scenario would allow for robust and exciting discussion and debate during the primary season while posing little risk to the president other than to encourage him take more progressive stands. It would also accomplish the critical task of energizing the Progressive base to turn out on Election Day. Imagine: A slate of six candidates announces its decision to run in the Democratic primaries. Each of the candidates is recognizable, articulate, and a person of acknowledged achievement. These contenders would each represent a field in which Obama has never clearly staked a progressive claim or where he has drifted toward the corporatist right. These fields would include: labor, poverty, military and foreign policy, health insurance and care, the environment, financial regulation, civil and political rights/empowerment, and consumer protection. Without primary challengers, President Obama will never have to seriously articulate and defend his beliefs to his own party. Given the dangers our nation faces, that option is unacceptable. The slate is the best method for challenging the president for a number of reasons: -The slate can indicate that its intention is not to defeat the president (a credible assertion given their number of voting columns) but to rigorously debate his policy stands. -The slate will collectively give voice to the fundamental principles and agendas that represent the soul of the Democratic Party, which has increasingly been deeply tarnished by corporate influence. -The slate will force Mr. Obama to pay attention to many more issues affecting many more Americans. He will be compelled to develop powerful, organic, and fresh language as opposed to stale poll-driven “themes.” -The slate will exercise a pull on Obama toward his liberal/progressive base (in the face of the countervailing pressure from “centrists” and corporatists) and leave that base with a feeling of positive empowerment. -The slate will excite the Democratic Party faithful and essential small-scale donors, who (despite the assertions of cable punditry) are essentially liberal and progressive. -A slate that is serious, experienced, and well-versed in policy will display a sobering contrast with the alarmingly weak, hysterical, and untested field taking shape on the right. -The slate will command more media attention for the Democratic primaries and the positive progressive discussions within the party as opposed to what will certainly be an increasingly extremist display on the right. -The slate makes it more difficult for party professionals to induce challengers to drop out of the race and more difficult for Mr. Obama to refuse or sidestep debates in early primaries.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:27:48 +0000

Cornell West and Nader launch primary challenge of Obama: We write to you in light of recent deteriorating events in Washington, D.C. Misguided negotiations by the Obama Administration over increasing the debt ceiling willingly put our nation’s vital social services on the chopping block while Bush-era tax cuts remain untouched. Clearly the situation has reached crisis proportions. In response, an innovative plan has been announced to reintroduce a progressive agenda back into the political discussion during the 2012 election season. Consider for a moment two very different scenarios for the 2012 Democratic presidential primaries. The First scenario, President Obama advances without contest to a unanimous nomination. There is no recognizable Democratic challenger, no meaningful debate on key progressive issues or past broken promises, just a seamless, self-contained operation on its way to raising one billion dollars in campaign funds. This scenario is what most observers expect. Mr. Obama will face neither opposition nor debate. He will have no need to clarify or defend his own polices or address the promises, kept and unkept, of his 2008 campaign. The president will not have to explain to his supporters why he directly escalated the war in Afghanistan and broadened America’s covert war in Pakistan, why he chose to engage in a military intervention in Libya, or why he has maintained the Bush Administration’s national security apparatus that allows for the suspension and abuse of constitutionally protected civil liberties–dismissing Congress all the way. In an uncontested Democratic primary, President Obama will never have to justify his decision to bail out Wall Street’s most profitable firms while failing to push for effective prosecution of the criminal behavior that triggered the recession, or his failure to push for real financial reform. He will not have to defend his decision to extend the Bush era tax cuts nor justify his acquiescence to Republican extortion during the debt ceiling negotiations. He will not have to answer questions on how his Administration completely failed to protect homeowner’s losing their homes to predatory banks, or even mention the word “poverty,” as he failed to do in his most recent State of the Union Address, even as more and more Americas sink into financial despair. He will never be challenged to fulfill his pledge to actively pursue a Labor-supported card check, or his promise to increase the federal minimum wage or why he took single payer off the table after he said he believes in it. The American labor movement, facing an unprecedented onslaught by the Right will not have the opportunity to voice its concerns and rally around a supportive candidate. The president will not be pressed to answer how he spent four years in office without addressing the ongoing destabilization of our climate or advocating a coherent and ecologically sound energy policy including defending his position on nuclear power and so called clean coal. Nor will he discuss regulatory agency deficiencies in enforcing corporate law and order in an era marked by a corporate crime wave having devastating economic consequences on workers and taxpayers and their savings and pensions. There will be no opportunity for the Hispanic and other relevant communities to speak out on immigration reform even as the Republicans continue to use it as a weapon of political demagoguery. Add your own concerns, disappointments, and frustrated hopes to this list of what will surely be left off the table during an express-lane primary. The valid disagreements within the Democratic Party, let alone the goals of progressives, will be completely overlooked. The media will gleefully cover the media circus that is sure to be the Republican primaries, magnifying every minor gaffe and carefully cataloguing every iteration and argument of the radical right. The cameras will cover the Democratic side only for orchestrated events, the whiff of scandal, and to offer commentary on how the campaign is positioning itself for the general election. The summation of this process will be a tediously scripted National Convention, deprived of robust exchange and well-wrought policy. And here the danger is clear: not only will progressive principles past and present be betrayed but large sections of voters will feel bored with and alienated from the democratic candidate. This would not serve the president’s campaign, our goals, or the nation’s needs. Thankfully, there is another option... YOU CAN GET THE REST VIA PDF HERE: http://www.singlepayeraction.org/blog/?p=3032

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:09:07 +0000

I would. Either we should get serious about deporting people immediately upon detection, or get serious about amnesty. Our current, hypocritical stance wherein Republicans allow people to enter the country in order to exploit their labor yet refuse to provide education to the children of those people is immoral and unethical.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:10:27 +0000

The states should be required to pay for the education of any kid they allow to reside in this country. Republicans are addicted to cheap, illegal labor. If they want to let these people in and exploit them, then yes - they have to educate the kids.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:09:30 +0000

In the case of the extremely poor? Please explain how extremely poor migrant farm workers can pay for private schools.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:59:39 +0000

Hey - I'm not arguing that the Dems are also mucking things up on this issue. They are, but the fact remains. The Republicans have granted amnesty, blocked border security measures, and scaled back enforcement while under Obama enforcement has been dramatically scaled up. My whole point here is that the rhetoric doesn't match the policy, on the left or the right. Lots of lefties talking about The Dream Act, which never comes, and lots of Republicans talking about enforcement of immigration laws and border security which never comes. They're all full of it. Best to look at the policy record rather than listen to their b.s. That's what I'm trying to assert.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:56:35 +0000

It is a complex issue, indeed. But clearly we are reaching the Earth's carrying capacity. Even if you don't believe that, it's hard to argue that having more wild lands and space per capita is not highly desirable. America has three times more people in it than the entire world did in the year zero. Certainly an American has a much larger carbon footprint than someone from the developing world, but if someone from the developing world moves here and stays, they eventually become an American with a big carbon footprint. I am for sustainability, and a sustainable economy has as its centerpiece, a sustainable population, which means a stable population that lives in harmony with its environment. You won't hear me arguing that America isn't failing to strive toward this on almost every front, but certainly population is a component.

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:04:28 +0000

DEFLATION is the big risk here, not inflation. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/infla...

Left, Right & Center - KCRW : UN Sharpens Focus on Middle East - Left, Right & Center on KCRW

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 03:54:12 +0000

This is exactly the sort of thinking that created Japan's "Lost Decade". Japan was caught in a liquidity trap (people sitting on their money, refusing to invest), but worried about inflation, the government stopped putting money into the economy. They tried to prop up the banks and real estate prices, but prices fell anyway (albeit very gradually because of repeated government intervention on behalf of the banks), and they refused to let inflation reduce the size of the debt in real terms. Their economy has been stuck in a ditch ever since.