en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/346134 Comments by blackmesa http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BIUUF02#IDComment40752272 maybe it was a bit simplistic but he hit the nail on the head. Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:13:32 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BIUUF02#IDComment40752272 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97HQQP00#IDComment18700774 we could go on and on here with things he said but never intended on doing... accept public financing, filibuster FISA, opt out of NAFTA, stop wasteful spending, withdraw from Iraq by the end of 2009, give public five days to review a bill before he signs it, ..... Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:00:13 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97HQQP00#IDComment18700774 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97HQQP00#IDComment18691315 LOL.. This lie and cover up is more complex than the Rezko land deal.. and for a dog? They spin everything.. Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:15:42 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97HQQP00#IDComment18691315 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97F4MNO0#IDComment18452065 You make a good point about how he wants the economy to appear fine in order to pass Cap and Trade that would hurt the economy. He wanted to pass a bogus stimulus and cried about "Crisis" non-stop It is terrible that what this administration and Democratic Machine puts out has nothing to do with reality except to smooth over their next political move... Everything is spin with these guys Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:52:40 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97F4MNO0#IDComment18452065 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97F4MNO0#IDComment18451602 Are fundamentals of the economy sound as Christine Romer said on Mar 15th? So the stimulus wasn't needed? Now all we have are political pay offs that will hamper the economy with more debt. It is clear that Obama, Pelosi, and Reid were pushing the stimulus and budget before more evidence of the economy stabilizing came out.. Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:40:53 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97F4MNO0#IDComment18451602 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97EJ4S00#IDComment18442675 Come on, there had to been a teleprompter around... the problem was that Axelrod hadn't loaded pirate text into it yet. Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:47:47 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97EJ4S00#IDComment18442675 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97EJ4S00#IDComment18442619 Reuters put it this way: "Obama, however, stuck closely to the script and replied that he wanted to remain focused on housing." LOL, the Axelrod's robot sticking close to the script... Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:46:35 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97EJ4S00#IDComment18442619 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97ECHLG1#IDComment18373142 "he wants us to us solar power and we are blocking out some of the sun" hahaha, you are right. This guy contradicts himself so much... maybe the expiration date on his solar power statements has passed? Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:59:26 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97ECHLG1#IDComment18373142 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97ECHLG1#IDComment18372907 "shooting particles into the air" omg... they are admitting that the Sun is (partially) responsible for climate change *faints* Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:53:47 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97ECHLG1#IDComment18372907 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979JBV82#IDComment17962509 We just had a democrat candidate who was largely unknown beat a very well known republican for the presidency. So we all know the power of the democrat machine. Conservatism is taking a beating but that doesn't mean it is wrong. It may take a while but good to win out and they could be even more defeats in 2010 but, one day conservatism and its uplifting message will be back. Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:13:44 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979JBV82#IDComment17962509 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979AVVO2#IDComment17939723 Everytime I see our President I have images of that movie where the Pres was pretty much a robot controlled by others Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:57:45 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979AVVO2#IDComment17939723 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D971UK1O2#IDComment17307290 excellent point. Add in calling Paling a pig, making fun of Nancy Reagen.... seems he is pretty low class Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:23:37 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D971UK1O2#IDComment17307290 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bprelutsky/2009/03/17/madoff-and-obama-fellow-ponzi-schemers/#IDComment17139388 "The con artist doesn’t use a gun, he merely appeals to people’s greed and the innate human desire to get something for nothing. So, while Obama’s adoring fans want their mortgages, their health care and their college tuition paid for by other people, so Madoff’s suckers wanted to gobble up preposterously huge profits on their investments." He really hit the nail on the head! Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:50:45 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bprelutsky/2009/03/17/madoff-and-obama-fellow-ponzi-schemers/#IDComment17139388 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96VRJ981#IDComment17139382 Shaping up to be another "I voted for it before I voted against it" deal.... nice job Congress Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:50:29 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96VRJ981#IDComment17139382 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96V8OM00#IDComment17105267 Don't executives for parts of the caompany that made money deserve bonuses? Parts of the company are operating fine. I can't find details on how these bonuses actually break down... so I am reluctant to criticize them in general.. Admittedly some who don't deserve a bonus will probably get one but, do we know this is true of the majority? Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:09:00 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96V8OM00#IDComment17105267 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96VAGVG1#IDComment17104893 It is unebelievable that the Obama administration is actually making W look good... didn't think that would happen in a million years Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:59:46 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96VAGVG1#IDComment17104893 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96VAGVG1#IDComment17104836 right. Cheney was pretty specific. Gibbs could have offered a fact based counter-argument but this administration is more about personal attacks than any discussion of ideas.. And I have to laugh at the fact that the WH can't pass up a chance to criticize Rush... Didn't Gibbs read the memo to stop that? LOL. Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:57:45 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96VAGVG1#IDComment17104836 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9776268a25e75ad5b44b4d87e8a32a02.4a1#IDComment16913270 I hope you are right but there are so many brainwashed people in this country... Obama could proclaim martial law and 45-49% of this country will still love him Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:36:27 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9776268a25e75ad5b44b4d87e8a32a02.4a1#IDComment16913270 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a39a7b54b886bba645d55c20ff5958c2.f11#IDComment16740103 lmao Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:57:16 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a39a7b54b886bba645d55c20ff5958c2.f11#IDComment16740103 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a39a7b54b886bba645d55c20ff5958c2.f11#IDComment16740006 totally agree! Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:54:54 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a39a7b54b886bba645d55c20ff5958c2.f11#IDComment16740006