<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/553217</link>
		<description>Comments by bink35</description>
<item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Have Americans Traded Freedom For Security?</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/roberts/2009/12/25/have-americans-traded-freedom-for-security/#IDComment49267142</link>
<description>&amp;quot;What goes around, comes around!&amp;quot;    INDEED!  Even here at anti-war.com, the nasty, superior attitude of too many Americans reveals itself in articles such as Sascha Matuszak&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;China&amp;rsquo;s Manifest Destiny.&amp;quot;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://original.antiwar.com/sascha-matuszak/2009/12/25/chinas-manifest-destiny/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://original.antiwar.com/sascha-matuszak/2009/...&lt;/a&gt;  It really is too easy to get Americans to hate Arabs, Muslims, and Chinese.  Disgusting.  In a way, Americans really do deserve their government.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/roberts/2009/12/25/have-americans-traded-freedom-for-security/#IDComment49267142</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : China&#039;s Manifest Destiny</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/sascha-matuszak/2009/12/25/chinas-manifest-destiny/#IDComment49237891</link>
<description>The totalitarian West seemed to do just fine economically.  You may not have noticed but the countries they&amp;#039;ve bombed, installed brutal puppet regimes, and have military bases in to remind them that they better do as they&amp;#039;re told (over 170 so far!) aren&amp;#039;t allowed to forget!  What will be interesting to see is what a world in which a great power country does BUSINESS with other countries will look like.  This is what China does - business.    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1884779_1884782_1884769,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/articl...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/sascha-matuszak/2009/12/25/chinas-manifest-destiny/#IDComment49237891</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : China&#039;s Manifest Destiny</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/sascha-matuszak/2009/12/25/chinas-manifest-destiny/#IDComment49237321</link>
<description>Matuszak seems to have a distorted view of both China and the U.S.   Maybe these videos will help you and any others of us who think we HAVE ANY RIGHT WHATSOEVER to go around the world lecturing and hecturing about any other country&amp;#039;s behavior.  We ought to consider &amp;quot;leading&amp;quot; by example.  1)  Obama and Empire &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXL998q7skI&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXL998q7skI&lt;/a&gt;  2)  John Pilger - Freedom next time (indictment of professional journalism) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-uq7O1RqQQ&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-uq7O1RqQQ&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipYIfUQqq3Q&amp;amp;feature=related&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipYIfUQqq3Q&amp;amp;fe...&lt;/a&gt;  (same speech as above with different footage.)  3)  John Pilger - Breaking the Silence:  Truth and Lies in the war on terror &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aQE64G6-8g&amp;amp;feature=related&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aQE64G6-8g&amp;amp;fe...&lt;/a&gt;  4)  John Pilger&amp;#039;s documentary explores the historic and current relationship of Washington with countries such as Venezuela, Bolivia and Chile.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHj735t_knk&amp;amp;feature=PlayList&amp;amp;p=55DEA1662840C530&amp;amp;index=25&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHj735t_knk&amp;amp;fe...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/sascha-matuszak/2009/12/25/chinas-manifest-destiny/#IDComment49237321</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : China&#039;s Manifest Destiny</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/sascha-matuszak/2009/12/25/chinas-manifest-destiny/#IDComment49205072</link>
<description>Has this site been hijacked by the neocons or have I been redirected over to the NY Times, WSJ, Washington Post, CNN, FOX, CBS, NBC, etc.?  Here&amp;#039;s are hint y&amp;#039;all:  going to Perry Link who&amp;#039;s made an entire career bashing China blows Matuszak&amp;#039;s cover wide open.  Shame on anti-war (or should this be anti-war-except-when-it-comes-to-China.com?)  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/sascha-matuszak/2009/12/25/chinas-manifest-destiny/#IDComment49205072</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Obama and the Graveyard of Empires</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/frank-creel/2009/10/02/obama-and-the-graveyard-of-empires/#IDComment37250595</link>
<description>Good gravy!  Please not let&amp;#039;s blame China for OUR wars!  If China were to stop buying our debt the Federal Reserve will simply print what it wants. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Oct 2009 01:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/frank-creel/2009/10/02/obama-and-the-graveyard-of-empires/#IDComment37250595</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : China&#039;s Porcelain Empire</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/09/chinas-porcelain-empire/#IDComment26941440</link>
<description>Please let us all know (somehow?) if you should decide to do a blog.  I&amp;#039;ll definately subscribe!  Do you suppose the West is intent on destabilizing China in order to install a puppet government to ensure that the current &amp;quot;joint ventures&amp;quot; become wholy owned subsidiaries of  the U.S. Government (now that they own our former blue chip companies and we&amp;#039;re broke?)  I wonder too if perhaps China&amp;#039;s biggest, unforgivable sin is that it has been making business deals counter to the interests of the U.S. i.e. it allows poor countries  the option of doing business in their own terms rather than on ones &amp;quot;negotiated&amp;quot; from a gunboat.  I&amp;#039;m not sure if I have this right but didn&amp;#039;t the British force opium sales to China to settle its  huge trade deficit and when China needed to pay its opium bills it did so by &amp;quot;leasing&amp;quot; Hong Kong?  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/09/chinas-porcelain-empire/#IDComment26941440</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : China&#039;s Porcelain Empire</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/09/chinas-porcelain-empire/#IDComment26888624</link>
<description>arthurborges, So much of the reporting about China is so negative and biased against the CCP and now, the Han.   Your comment are very informative.  Do you have a blog about life in China?  Have you considered one?   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/09/chinas-porcelain-empire/#IDComment26888624</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : China&#039;s Porcelain Empire</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/09/chinas-porcelain-empire/#IDComment26886338</link>
<description>The student protest that took place on the main street of the city looks to have been a diversion to the real intent of the day:  slaughtering Han in side streets and alley ways:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peterfoster/100002368/uighur-unrest-not-another-tiananmen/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peterfoster/100...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/09/chinas-porcelain-empire/#IDComment26886338</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : China&#039;s Porcelain Empire</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/09/chinas-porcelain-empire/#IDComment26867407</link>
<description>What you fail to say in your article (have the neocons gotten to you like they did Hitchens?) is that more than a few people died - it was more than 150 and most of them were Han.  Are you sure Kadeer isn&amp;#039;t supported by the CIA/NED?  You might want to read up on some of the comments to Kadeer&amp;#039;s WSJ op-ed:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124701252209109027.html#articleTabs%3Dcomments&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12470125220910902...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/09/chinas-porcelain-empire/#IDComment26867407</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Our McMan in Bananastan</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/06/08/our-mcman-in-bananastan/#IDComment23770511</link>
<description>&amp;quot;McChrystal only drinks rain water to avoid the effects of fluoridation on his precious bodily fluids, and that he takes acai berry purgatives to maintain his purity of essence. However much of this is true or merely legend-crafting...&amp;quot;  No, not legend-crafting.  The acai berry and anti-fluoridation angle is to appeal to the so-called progressive Democrat wing (or more accurately, neolibs.) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/huber/2009/06/08/our-mcman-in-bananastan/#IDComment23770511</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Obama&#039;s Obstacles in Congress</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2009/06/08/obamas-obstacles-in-congress/#IDComment23743704</link>
<description>How does this work?  It&amp;#039;s just a change in tactics, not goal.  The neo-libs have no quarrel with neocon objectives but TACTIC!  Note also that both sides support the Dalai Lama and the new Cold War against China because the U.S. must control the world.  God forbid that countries should be free to choose who they do business with! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2009/06/08/obamas-obstacles-in-congress/#IDComment23743704</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Leave China Alone</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/06/07/leave-china-alone/#IDComment23681145</link>
<description>Look who&amp;#039;s talking is right!  This coming from a country that&amp;#039;s only recently killed 700,000+ thousand (and counting!) in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan and displaced up to 3 MILLIION.    This coming from the country that   1)  backed Saddam Hussein&amp;#039;s nasty proxy war against Iran which lasted more than a decade - the longest lasting modern era war by the way 2)  up-rooted entire populations in the Pacific atolls then proceeded to test bomb atomic weapons rendering their homelands uninhabitable forever 3)  removed the entire population of Diego Rivera to gain strategic advantage in the Indian Ocean 4)  supported regime change (some successful, others not so much)  from Hawaii to to Vietnam to USSR to China to Iran to pretty much all of Africa and South/Central America.  Give me a break.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/06/07/leave-china-alone/#IDComment23681145</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Nuclear Promises</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/zia-mian/2009/06/05/nuclear-promises/#IDComment23541398</link>
<description>Um, how else would nations lacking 700+ military bases around the world defend itself against the U.S. and its vassal states? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2009 02:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/zia-mian/2009/06/05/nuclear-promises/#IDComment23541398</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Antiwar.com Original Articles : Who Will Stand Up to America and Israel?</title>
<link>http://original.antiwar.com/roberts/2009/05/27/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/#IDComment22532919</link>
<description>Anyone else notice that the relentlessly virulent China-bashing comes from the same war-mongering countries and their mainstream media?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://original.antiwar.com/roberts/2009/05/27/who-will-stand-up-to-america-and-israel/#IDComment22532919</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>