<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1506440</link>
		<description>Comments by asimmons710</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Speaker John Boehner Addresses Nation on Debt Ceiling Debate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-speaker-john-boehner-addresses-nation-on-debt-ceiling-debate/#IDComment177431628</link>
<description>While I understand your point and am myself getting more than a little sick and tired of &amp;#039;committees&amp;#039;, what he has proposed is quite legitimate and completely Constitutional.   The committee would recommend the required cuts and the House and Senate would then have an up or down vote, at least as far as I understand this.  Again, to be perfectly clear, I do NOT like this portion of the proposal, but there is nothing Unconstitutional about it.  IMHO we are missing the core point in all of this, that being the Balanced Budget Amendment. If I were the Speaker, Obama, Reid and EVERYONE else in congress would get NOTHING without a clean vote and recommendation of the Prez.  All said, you bring up a very good point just the same.  Take (a balanced budget approach) care, Andy </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/live-stream-speaker-john-boehner-addresses-nation-on-debt-ceiling-debate/#IDComment177431628</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Petulant Obama Complains: Boehner Didn&#039;t Return My Phone Call</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/petulent-obama-complains-boehner-didnt-return-my-phone-call/#IDComment176549267</link>
<description>The President complains in one breath about not getting his phone call returned (read: demands met), then in the next breath complains about what he heard when it was.    What did he honestly (I know that term does not appear in the lie-beral dictionary) you expect he was going to say Mr. President?    Seems as if the President failed the Jedi-mind trick course at Hazard....errrr... I mean Harvard.    Take (a corespondents course) care,  Andy </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/petulent-obama-complains-boehner-didnt-return-my-phone-call/#IDComment176549267</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer: Who is Obama to &#039;Summon&#039; Leaders to White House?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-who-is-obama-to-summon-leaders-to-white-house/#IDComment176547243</link>
<description>To Mr. K&amp;#039;s point, he is spot on, however did Bohner not in one sentence say that &amp;#039;talks were at an end&amp;#039; then when asked if he was meeting with the President say &amp;#039;Yes Ma&amp;#039;am&amp;#039;.    Part of me cant help but think the dog and pony clause is in full effect between establishment Rep and Lie-berals. But that is just an opinion.    Just a word of novice advice to Mr. Speaker and the rest of the RINO National Committee, this is what you get when you negotiate behind closed doors. If you do intend to resolve this issue with the Senate, DEMAND that they take place in the open and televised.    Take (control) care,  Andy </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-who-is-obama-to-summon-leaders-to-white-house/#IDComment176547243</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : George Will Brilliantly Traps Liberal Panelists with ObamaCare Constitutional Challenge</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/george-will-brilliantly-traps-liberal-panelists-with-obamacare-constitutional-challenge/#IDComment170060034</link>
<description>That, my friend, is true American entrepreneurship and sound fiscal policy.  Now all you have to do is NOT pay your taxes and the President will appoint you and chief economic adviser.  Can I have fries with that, Andy </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jul 2011 20:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/george-will-brilliantly-traps-liberal-panelists-with-obamacare-constitutional-challenge/#IDComment170060034</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : President Ronald Reagan&#039;s Farewell Address 1989</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/president-ronald-reagans-farewell-address-1989/#IDComment126291290</link>
<description>Lest anyone want to argue that Mr. Reagan did not represent America, I still remember being at work watching the motorcade taking him to his final resting place.      The woman next to me, clearly saddened, made the statement &amp;#039;I loved my Ronnie&amp;#039;.      She was and is a life long Democrat and liberal.      &amp;#039;nuf said.      Andy </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Feb 2011 12:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/president-ronald-reagans-farewell-address-1989/#IDComment126291290</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : On MSNBC, Leftist Political Cartoonist Calls for Revolution, Violence on Table</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/on-msnbc-leftist-political-cartoonist-calls-for-revolution-violence-on-table/#IDComment108799643</link>
<description>Ladies and Germs, scroll through all the post here and notice the comments of individuals with triple digit &amp;#039;-&amp;#039; ratings. Seems WAY out of character for most of them.    Almost as if they are stoking a fire or two.    Just an observation, I could be wrong.    Take (a closer look) care,  Andy </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/on-msnbc-leftist-political-cartoonist-calls-for-revolution-violence-on-table/#IDComment108799643</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Tsunami Effect: Obama Talks Tax Cuts in Weekly Address  </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/tsunami-effect-obama-talks-tax-cuts-in-weekly-address/#IDComment108236357</link>
<description>Very well stated, precisely to the point and on target.  Take care, Andy </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Nov 2010 18:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/tsunami-effect-obama-talks-tax-cuts-in-weekly-address/#IDComment108236357</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : New Planned Parenthood Mega-Facility Called &#039;Sacred and Holy Ground&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/new-planned-parenthood-mega-facility-called-sacred-and-holy-ground/#IDComment97182230</link>
<description>Sorry, for the error I was posting for Mr. Duh.   My point is that although (according to DUH) 97% of planned parent hoods does not involve abortion, a bs # that like you I find HIGHLY dubious, the remaining 3% is a substantial source of their profit. Therefore his number and reasoning are mere spin in an attempt to confuse the issue. A fact you clearly pointed out and I agree with wholeheartedly.  PPH made 1 billion in profits last fiscal year, I bet dollars to dead babies that a large if not majority portion of that came from abortion.  That is what I was getting at, again sorry if you misunderstood.  Take (my apology) care, Andy   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Sep 2010 19:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/new-planned-parenthood-mega-facility-called-sacred-and-holy-ground/#IDComment97182230</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : New Planned Parenthood Mega-Facility Called &#039;Sacred and Holy Ground&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/new-planned-parenthood-mega-facility-called-sacred-and-holy-ground/#IDComment97096696</link>
<description>And what percent of their funding/revenue/profits are derived from the alleged remaining 3%?  Take (the spin out) care, Andy </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Sep 2010 11:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/new-planned-parenthood-mega-facility-called-sacred-and-holy-ground/#IDComment97096696</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : New Planned Parenthood Mega-Facility Called &#039;Sacred and Holy Ground&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/new-planned-parenthood-mega-facility-called-sacred-and-holy-ground/#IDComment97095007</link>
<description>Just out of curiosity, I wonder what this crowd thinks of the (Left) wing-nut at the Discovery Channel offices last week.  If they feel this abortion clinic is &amp;#039;sacred and holly ground&amp;#039; then that fruit loop must be THEIR messiah.  Take (a peak behind the scenes) care, Andy   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Sep 2010 11:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/new-planned-parenthood-mega-facility-called-sacred-and-holy-ground/#IDComment97095007</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Content of His Character: Sharpton Stumps for Black Candidate With Heated Racial Rhetoric</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/content-of-his-character-sharpton-stumps-for-black-candidate-solely-because-of-race/#IDComment97007582</link>
<description>&amp;quot;....Keep up the good work Reverend Al...&amp;quot;      So the DNC considers racism &amp;#039;good work&amp;#039;, why do they keep saying otherwise? Very Liber-il-logical.     &amp;quot;......Make sure everyone knows the GOP KKK/NAZI Movement is trying to take back over ......&amp;quot;      And the DNC is tired of them taking it away from them.      Take (a look in the mirror) care,   Andy </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Sep 2010 23:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/content-of-his-character-sharpton-stumps-for-black-candidate-solely-because-of-race/#IDComment97007582</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Scholarship Scandal Congresswoman Falls Apart in Anderson Cooper Interview</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/scholarship-scandal-congresswoman-falls-apart-in-anderson-cooper-interview/#IDComment96939673</link>
<description>Couple of points.    All of this, though sad and entertaining at the same time, means nothing because Congress is exempt from following the same laws they demand us to abide by. The only remorse and responsibility Mrs. Johnson feels, imo, is that of not hiding her criminal behavior better and being caught.    No Kudos to Mr. Cooper. My cynical take on this is that of desperation on the part of the media. They know they&amp;#039;re deep in it come Nov. Therefore they must ACT as if they are helping Pelosi &amp;#039;drain the swamp&amp;#039;. Nothing more, nothing less. Mrs, Johnson knows it, Mr. Cooper knows it. And we should know it to.    Take (a dog and pony show) care,  Andy </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Sep 2010 11:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/scholarship-scandal-congresswoman-falls-apart-in-anderson-cooper-interview/#IDComment96939673</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer:  Voters Not Just Angry at Obama, It&#039;s ALL Democrats</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-voters-not-just-angry-at-obama-its-all-democrats/#IDComment96763693</link>
<description>What we as Americans need is a Constitutional Amendment giving states the power to impeach their Congressmen during their term. That and term limits would do more for this Country than anyone can imagine.  Unfortunately, given this must be done by the very people it would remove (at all levels of government), well, I&amp;#039;ll let you figure out the odds of success.  Take care, Andy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-voters-not-just-angry-at-obama-its-all-democrats/#IDComment96763693</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Krauthammer:  Voters Not Just Angry at Obama, It&#039;s ALL Democrats</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-voters-not-just-angry-at-obama-its-all-democrats/#IDComment96763191</link>
<description>You speak heap&amp;#039;m plenty truth dar Tex.  Take care, Andy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/krauthammer-voters-not-just-angry-at-obama-its-all-democrats/#IDComment96763191</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : WH Spokesman: Obama is &#039;Committed Mainstream Christian&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/wh-spokesman-obama-is-committed-mainstream-christian/#IDComment96761783</link>
<description>As usual, no one bothered to ask Mr. Gibbs the all important follow up question....         &amp;quot;Mr. Gibbs, could you or the President provide his definition of &amp;#039;Committed mainstream Christian&amp;#039; for the record?&amp;quot;        Without that answer, all of this is merely spin that can and will be defined later when he talks himself into another political bind. You know, a lot  (exactly) like the Iftar dinner remarks.        Take (a knee) care,    Andy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/wh-spokesman-obama-is-committed-mainstream-christian/#IDComment96761783</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Carter and American Prisoner Leave North Korea</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/carter-and-american-prisoner-leave-north-korea/#IDComment95596210</link>
<description>&amp;quot;...Reagan actually extended the stay off the hostages by negotiating with the Iranians to keep them until after the election. He knew that would have sealed a win for Carter if he negotiated their release during the election campaign....&amp;quot;      Not making much sense there Lib. You agree that I am correct ,and I thank you for that. Now let&amp;#039;s examine your claim in relation the my statement that you again say is correct.      As we agree the hostages were never going to be released to Carter as long as he was President, exactly how could Reagan be responsible for extending the stay of the hostages?    Take (a logic class) care,   Andy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/carter-and-american-prisoner-leave-north-korea/#IDComment95596210</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Civil Rights Leader: Tea Party and KKK Interchangeable</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/civil-rights-leader-tea-party-and-kkk-interchangeable/#IDComment95555166</link>
<description>Well said. Still chuckling at it.   Take care,  Andy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/civil-rights-leader-tea-party-and-kkk-interchangeable/#IDComment95555166</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Carter and American Prisoner Leave North Korea</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/carter-and-american-prisoner-leave-north-korea/#IDComment95553683</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re neither correct nor incorrect, if that&amp;#039;s possible lol.          I assert that if Reagan (a Republican) had not won the election Iran not have released them. So in that sense I contend that Carter did not in fact &amp;#039;get the hostages back from Iran&amp;#039;.          As for the crash, I agree &amp;#039;he didn&amp;#039;t crash any of those helicopters&amp;#039; and I would never lay that at the feet of Jimmy. However though it&amp;#039;s not Carter&amp;#039;s fault,  you seem to imply it is the fault of the &amp;#039;top military commanders&amp;#039;. Am I misreading your statement?          Take care,     Andy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/carter-and-american-prisoner-leave-north-korea/#IDComment95553683</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Carter and American Prisoner Leave North Korea</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/carter-and-american-prisoner-leave-north-korea/#IDComment95551514</link>
<description>Not sure what you mean by your reply, sorry. Could you explain, please.  Take care, Andy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/carter-and-american-prisoner-leave-north-korea/#IDComment95551514</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Carter and American Prisoner Leave North Korea</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/carter-and-american-prisoner-leave-north-korea/#IDComment95551222</link>
<description>No rational, honest, intelligent  (read; conservative) ones anyway.  Thanks,  Andy </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/carter-and-american-prisoner-leave-north-korea/#IDComment95551222</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>