<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/660471</link>
		<description>Comments by Arkady</description>
<item>
<title>Right Condition : Deval Patrick and MA legislators introduce new gun restriction proposals.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2013/01/deval-patrick-and-ma-legislators.html#IDComment561130184</link>
<description>Treated or jailed depending on circumstance. �You are slightly spinning my statement out of context.�&lt;br /&gt;If an ill person commits a crime, then arrest him/her. �Problem is, we do not currently. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Feb 2013 20:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2013/01/deval-patrick-and-ma-legislators.html#IDComment561130184</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Hostess bankruptcy:  Blame Bernanke and then the unions.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/hostess-bankruptcy-blame-bernanke-and.html#IDComment494259607</link>
<description>Next time you comment, try reading everything instead of skimming.     The silly drought has already been addressed in the comment section.         The  close-minded points you brought up are hardly worth responding to, but very quickly.        1) Input costs are going up across the board, some companies can absorb and some cannot. You are not disproving anything just making random assertions.    2) You are suddenly an expert in Hostess? �They had old equipment eh? �According to the unions, which is where you are getting that absurd comment, how about facts and logic instead of rumor?      3) Blaming greed and hedge funds is Leftist boilerplate and does not belong in any intellectual conversation. Those funds are the only Hostess survived as long as they did, the company accrued debt for a reason.        Laugh and be arrogant all day long, does not make you look smarter or validate any of your &amp;quot;points&amp;quot;.      P.S. That is absurd claptrap and again, you are just parroting talking points.  Lending in big banks was crunched, other lending was fine.  Justifying printing money shows you that have no grasp of economics and that is beyond anything I can help you with in the comment section.   Anyone who advocates fixing credit expansion busts with more credit expansion is very very lost. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/hostess-bankruptcy-blame-bernanke-and.html#IDComment494259607</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Hostess bankruptcy:  Blame Bernanke and then the unions.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/hostess-bankruptcy-blame-bernanke-and.html#IDComment492959175</link>
<description>The question is why the bankruptcy happened, not what happened after the fact. � Executives lining their pockets in anticipation of bankruptcy is sad and manipulative, but in the grand scheme of things a meaningless gesture. �We are talking hundreds of millions in losses and thousands of jobs lost, a bonus to salary conversion is peanuts. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 05:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/hostess-bankruptcy-blame-bernanke-and.html#IDComment492959175</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Hostess bankruptcy:  Blame Bernanke and then the unions.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/hostess-bankruptcy-blame-bernanke-and.html#IDComment492675637</link>
<description>No I do not realize that and neither should you, since if it was the drought it would affect wheat prices - and it has not.    Even more amusing is that the map you yourself provided debunks your very assertion.  The drought is primarily Texas, Arizona, parts of Colorado, New Mexico, parts of Nebraska.   Primary corn states are: Iowa, Illinois, Nebraska, and Minnesota.  On your map you provided those states are experiencing moist conditions.  The only state that has some regions affected by drought is Nebraska.     See, apologists will always try to justify and explain, but facts, they are stubborn things. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/hostess-bankruptcy-blame-bernanke-and.html#IDComment492675637</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : My 2012 Presidential prediction</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/my-2012-presidential-prediction.html#IDComment481434857</link>
<description>Hah, there was also a visible omission of Rush and Glenn Beck references.  I mean sheesh, can&amp;#039;t even get properly insulted nowadays.  What has the world come to?     Let me check my trusty Fox News foldout calendar that I carry with me everywhere I go to check on Hannity - he is so godly... </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/my-2012-presidential-prediction.html#IDComment481434857</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : My 2012 Presidential prediction</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/my-2012-presidential-prediction.html#IDComment481357813</link>
<description>Wow, have not seen a comment like this in a while.  How in the world does a partisan hack like you end up here?  I see you know nothing about me, did not bother to read the first half of the post and decided to label me a racist!!?      The worst part, your reading comprehension is akin to that of a 3 year old, as you cannot even understand the very sentence your pasted.   You are so dull that I have to actually spell out to you, that the second half of the sentence is about Mitt Romney.  I feel very sorry for whoever is unfortunate to consume your rhetoric as you barely have sufficient intelligence to decipher a few sentences.  Yet somehow YOU call ME mean and inciteful,  you represent precisely the lowest common denominator that I describe - I find it almost amazing that you show up within 20 minutes of this post.        I would delete it for being painfully stupid and insulting, but why would I deprive my readers of showing them an example of what our &amp;quot;involved&amp;quot; electorate looks like.       The political gods are smiling upon me today. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Nov 2012 19:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/11/my-2012-presidential-prediction.html#IDComment481357813</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Live blogging the 3rd party debate</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/10/live-blogging-3rd-party-debate.html#IDComment471286589</link>
<description>I think I agree with you on all points. �Although I am not sure that the boos I heard from the audience were appropriate, I believe it was in response to something Goode said. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/10/live-blogging-3rd-party-debate.html#IDComment471286589</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Live blogging the 2012 Vice President debate; Paul Ryan and Joe Biden.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/10/live-blogging-2012-vice-president.html#IDComment461603420</link>
<description>It was worth watching...probably...just for Biden&amp;#39;s antics. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/10/live-blogging-2012-vice-president.html#IDComment461603420</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Live blog coverage of the first 2012 presidential debate:  Romney vs Obama!</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/10/live-blog-coverage-of-first-2012.html#IDComment457252727</link>
<description>None from me, as I will not be watching it :) </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Oct 2012 04:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/10/live-blog-coverage-of-first-2012.html#IDComment457252727</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Navigating the American political wilderness</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/06/navigating-american-political.html#IDComment389193361</link>
<description>Hehe, excellent point. �Forgot the baby killer part, definitely heard that one too. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2012/06/navigating-american-political.html#IDComment389193361</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : San Francisco news purposely showing Mayor Jean Quan as a Republican.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/11/san-francisco-news-purposely-showing.html#IDComment216533241</link>
<description>Yup. You can pretty much hold her responsible for the whole situation in Oakland. � </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Nov 2011 23:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/11/san-francisco-news-purposely-showing.html#IDComment216533241</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : San Francisco news purposely showing Mayor Jean Quan as a Republican.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/11/san-francisco-news-purposely-showing.html#IDComment215889871</link>
<description>Thanks! �I saw that article and thought \&quot;wow, Republicans have gotten really really dumb recently\&quot;. �It just seemed like such odd behavior that I investigated and turns out, she is not only a Democrat, but a very Progressive one. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/11/san-francisco-news-purposely-showing.html#IDComment215889871</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Latest poll confirms; OWS is an extremely Leftist movement.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/latest-poll-confirms-ows-is-extremely.html#IDComment215074205</link>
<description>Typical argument from a typical occubot, I know polls and facts are annoying. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 01:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/latest-poll-confirms-ows-is-extremely.html#IDComment215074205</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Oakland police did not violate anyone\&#039;s first amendment rights.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/oakland-police-did-not-violate-anyones.html#IDComment214793836</link>
<description>That is exactly the problem, once the violence starts the whole situation spins out of control. �Police are very reactionary they crack down immediately without much thought. �It is a preventive mechanism to insure they always maintain control. �That is why provoking them is entirely stupid. �&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My suspicion is that they were provoked on purpose - I did not know about CA police being especially brutal - perhaps someone in the crowd did. �The police overreacted and now there is a national story. � This is not any different than the Arab Spring, �it evokes far more sympathy.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, you are focusing on the emotional consequence. �I am focusing on legality. �Police always have a right to \&quot;defend\&quot; themselves from all danger whether real or not. �That is what they did.� </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/oakland-police-did-not-violate-anyones.html#IDComment214793836</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Oakland police did not violate anyone\&#039;s first amendment rights.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/oakland-police-did-not-violate-anyones.html#IDComment214613998</link>
<description>I am not supporting police brutality at all, I am simply observing that this was not a random act of violence towards \&quot;peaceful\&quot; protesters.�&lt;br /&gt;There is nothing excusable or defensible about provoking the police by pelting them with bottles, it is stupid.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Should they have used flash bangs? �No, but once violence breaks out it becomes a moot point of determining how much violence is appropriate.�&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not sure how or why you think that I would defend the Tea Party in the same case, I am not biased towards the right at all. �I am biased to any group that wants to limit Government, OWS wants to expand Government, they have no sympathies from me. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 04:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/oakland-police-did-not-violate-anyones.html#IDComment214613998</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Latest poll confirms; OWS is an extremely Leftist movement.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/latest-poll-confirms-ows-is-extremely.html#IDComment213914608</link>
<description>The lack of employment also suggests that this is a disgruntled movement - not that I blame them per se, but to lash out at corporations because life is hard is a recipe for disaster. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/latest-poll-confirms-ows-is-extremely.html#IDComment213914608</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : OWS is a hard left movement.  Warning: Graphic imagery.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/ows-is-hard-left-movement-warning.html#IDComment212766842</link>
<description>They are fighting for more regulation as they blame deregulation for our problems �You have nothing in common with them, why would you support it? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/ows-is-hard-left-movement-warning.html#IDComment212766842</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : No, actually I am the 99%.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/no-actually-i-am-99.html#IDComment212593311</link>
<description>My pleasure, thanks for reading! :D </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/no-actually-i-am-99.html#IDComment212593311</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : OWS is a hard left movement.  Warning: Graphic imagery.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/ows-is-hard-left-movement-warning.html#IDComment212383005</link>
<description>Zero. �While my family certainly has and it is so painful to watch this useful idiot parade. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/ows-is-hard-left-movement-warning.html#IDComment212383005</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Right Condition : Wealth inequality in America, understanding the source.</title>
<link>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/wealth-inequality-in-america.html#IDComment211849564</link>
<description>Socialism in any form is flawed because it implies that one&amp;#39;s private property must be seized. �This is the anti-thesis to a healthy country where citizens can engage in capital formation.&lt;br /&gt;We here in America, now engage in two grotesque forms of capital destruction.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1) �We take it away by force through entitlements and taxation&lt;br /&gt;2) �We destroy the capital itself.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Socialism needs to be stricken from our minds entirely, but too many individuals believe that a healthy blend between capitalism and socialism forms an ideal economy - of course nothing can be further from the truth.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Your welcome, my pleasure. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rightcondition.com/2011/10/wealth-inequality-in-america.html#IDComment211849564</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>