<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/307465</link>
		<description>Comments by apoorv</description>
<item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Why traditional ECM tools like Documentum, FileNet, SharePoint, and Alfresco are not suited for clou</title>
<link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2462-Why-traditional-ECM-tools-like-Documentum-FileNet-SharePoint-and-Alfresco-are-not-suited-for-cloud-file-sharing#IDComment488633629</link>
<description>Peter, Of course its an opinion. And so are your points.  For #2:  Wasn&amp;#039;t Alfresco planning to partner with Dropbox at some point in time? If cloud file sharing didn&amp;#039;t have value, why would Alfresco want to do that?   You accuse me of spreading falsehood in #3. So in your opinion, which &amp;quot;old skool ECM&amp;quot;  (i don&amp;#039;t subscribe to that term btw) is architected for Cloud? Can you point me to customers using those or service providers who offer it as a SaaS (not managed hosting) based on one of those?   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 02:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2462-Why-traditional-ECM-tools-like-Documentum-FileNet-SharePoint-and-Alfresco-are-not-suited-for-cloud-file-sharing#IDComment488633629</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Why traditional ECM tools like Documentum, FileNet, SharePoint, and Alfresco are not suited for clou</title>
<link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2462-Why-traditional-ECM-tools-like-Documentum-FileNet-SharePoint-and-Alfresco-are-not-suited-for-cloud-file-sharing#IDComment488222751</link>
<description>Peter, Bernhard, @jazzonbike - Thanks for your comments.   Why was Alfresco in the title? Well, it&amp;#039;s an important ECM/DM vendor isn&amp;#039;t it? And the issue I was trying to address in this post was  whether ECM tools are good fit for file-sharing use cases or not. The key aspect here is &amp;quot;cloud based file sharing&amp;quot; and not &amp;quot;cloud based ECM&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;cloud based something else&amp;quot;. Sure, Alfresco (and other ECM/DM tools) can do file sharing but I don&amp;#039;t consider them file-sharing tools - they don&amp;#039;t have many key features that those file sharing tools have.   Now Does Alfresco bring ECM to the cloud? Well, that&amp;#039;s a completely different post :).  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2462-Why-traditional-ECM-tools-like-Documentum-FileNet-SharePoint-and-Alfresco-are-not-suited-for-cloud-file-sharing#IDComment488222751</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : What\&#039;s the value-add of Social Media Monitoring and Intelligence tools? &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title>
<link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2410-Whats-the-value-add-of-Social-Media-Monitoring-and-Intelligence-tools#IDComment440462604</link>
<description>James - Lithium declined to participate in our evaluation process. We might include them in a future release depending on feedback from our subscribers.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2410-Whats-the-value-add-of-Social-Media-Monitoring-and-Intelligence-tools#IDComment440462604</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Should you go with a Portal or Web CMS? &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title>
<link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2325-Should-you-go-with-a-Portal-or-Web-CMS#IDComment336676995</link>
<description>Thanks Martin for your comment. I agree with you that IDM is probably more relevant for Portal than WCM - mainly because Portal is *usually* supposed to handle many applications whereas WCM *usually* handles its own content. That is why the paper also calls out user management as an important feature specifically for Portals.   However, having said that, i&amp;#039;d also argue that IDM is an important aspect to be considered independently of a Portal or a CMS tool. Its like a search engine in that sense - you can use a search engine from your Portal or CMS tool but for a large/complex/enterprise implementation you will probably use a separate search engine tool outside of your Portal/CMS and instead integrate it.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2325-Should-you-go-with-a-Portal-or-Web-CMS#IDComment336676995</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Rave Becomes a New Apache Portal Project &lt; Real Story Group Blog</title>
<link>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2317-Rave-Becomes-a-New-Apache-Portal-Project#IDComment333631935</link>
<description>Bill - thanks for sharing your view. I&amp;#039;d love to chat more about your experience using Rave.   While we might have different opinions, I  agree - if its viable for you, then its a good choice for you :).  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Apr 2012 05:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.realstorygroup.com/Blog/2317-Rave-Becomes-a-New-Apache-Portal-Project#IDComment333631935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Digital Trends : Next round of iPad 2 releases spurn India</title>
<link>http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/next-round-of-ipad-2-releases-spurn-india/#IDComment137770314</link>
<description>well - while i oppose this discrimination  but the fact is  charging differential pricing for tourists is a standard practice that i&amp;#039;ve seen worldwide in many countries. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/next-round-of-ipad-2-releases-spurn-india/#IDComment137770314</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Trends: Many Portal Products Getting Refreshed</title>
<link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1792-Portal-Marketplace-Refresh#IDComment63851526</link>
<description>Dara - That&amp;#039;s an interesting point about portal software.  We&amp;#039;d love to know more about your experiences in moving towards light weight, decoupled tools that you mentioned.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1792-Portal-Marketplace-Refresh#IDComment63851526</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Trends: Is there a best CMS tool for your industry?</title>
<link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1637-Best-CMS#IDComment26403280</link>
<description>Like James, I also echo your thoughts Tony. In fact, some customers take it to an extreme. One of our customers wanted us to show them a reference - they wanted to talk with someone in North America, in the Banking industry, who had upgraded that specific product V, from a specific version x to a specific version y (mind you, x and y contained minor versions).  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1637-Best-CMS#IDComment26403280</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Trends: Clickability shows how not to write a white paper</title>
<link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1635-Clickability-White-Paper-Mess#IDComment26104261</link>
<description>Good one. I actually registered and downloaded the &amp;quot;white&amp;quot; paper thinking i&amp;#039;ll get some new insights into migration. Obviously that turned out to be a stupid idea! And i&amp;#039;m not even going to blog abt it because it&amp;#039;ll just give them more publicity. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2009 08:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1635-Clickability-White-Paper-Mess#IDComment26104261</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Trends: Some lessons out of ECM vendor demo hell</title>
<link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1624-ECM-Demo-Advice#IDComment25454739</link>
<description>If the term vendor can be extended to include implementers also then this debate of what is a &amp;quot;cost of sale&amp;quot; has many other implications. As an example, an implementation partner does a due diligence to understand requirements so as to be able to give a &amp;quot;fixed price quote&amp;quot;.  Should a customer pay for that? From a customer point of view, the requirements they gave in the first place were complete but my experience shows that that is many times not the case.  So i&amp;#039;d say there is not straight answer - it depends on each situation, the size of the deal, strategic importance of relationship and many other such factors. Sometimes, it is included in some other component (for example, warranty is often included as part of implementation cost) while at other times, it is a pure investment  - cost of sale, cost of relationship, cost of reference or whatever :). </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1624-ECM-Demo-Advice#IDComment25454739</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Trends: Changing our comments policy</title>
<link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1553-Comment-Change#IDComment17730715</link>
<description>I second that.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1553-Comment-Change#IDComment17730715</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Trends: Blogs Are Dead! Long Live Blogging!</title>
<link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1494-Blogs-Are-Dead!-Long-Live-Blogging!#IDComment14770182</link>
<description>nice and balanced perspective as usual. both blogging and micro-blogging have their place - we just need to find the right balance (and right usage). </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1494-Blogs-Are-Dead!-Long-Live-Blogging!#IDComment14770182</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>