<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/771458</link>
		<description>Comments by annica2</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Scott Brown Win Is a Victory For Bush Foreign Policy, Defeat For Ron Paul Isolationism</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/edondero/2010/01/24/scott-brown-win-is-a-victory-for-bush-foreign-policy-defeat-for-ron-paul-isolationism/#IDComment53797312</link>
<description>it&amp;#039;s time folks learn the difference between isolationism and non interventionism, especially the author of this article.   isolationism(quite the opposite of non interventionism) is a policy of protectionism, tariffs, berlin walls and a lack of diplomacy etc.   non interventionism is the policy of avoiding entangling alliances and aggressive wars while maintaining diplomatic relations and commerce with other nations.   it&amp;#039;s safe to say martha coakley was campaigning with isolationist rhetoric, but to call ron paul an isolationist seriously shows a lack of philosophical intellect.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/edondero/2010/01/24/scott-brown-win-is-a-victory-for-bush-foreign-policy-defeat-for-ron-paul-isolationism/#IDComment53797312</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>