<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1180102</link>
		<description>Comments by angry_american_</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305508066</link>
<description>You exemplify why you are considered an enemy to people who honor the work of our Founding Fathers. You and your ilk will be...defeated. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305508066</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305504353</link>
<description>A terrible and unexpected loss. Rest in peace, Mr. Breitbart . </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305504353</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305503992</link>
<description>A terrible and unexpected loss. Rest in peace, Mr. Breitbart . </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305503992</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Carter \&#039;pleased\&#039; with Egypt polls</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.de1b6202342d998e00eb801ac291148e.b41&amp;show_article=1#IDComment261086680</link>
<description>He is so Left he&amp;#039;s blind. Another communist for liberty- lol. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.de1b6202342d998e00eb801ac291148e.b41&amp;show_article=1#IDComment261086680</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : EXCLUSIVE: Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter: ‘My Mom Wants to Leave Congress’</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jsshapiro/2011/12/29/exclusive-nancy-pelosis-daughter-my-mom-wants-to-leave-congress/#IDComment250389898</link>
<description>Like Elvis, she will only leave when she dies on the Throne. She is a cancer upon the Constitution and the ideals of Representative government. Please, GET OUT. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jsshapiro/2011/12/29/exclusive-nancy-pelosis-daughter-my-mom-wants-to-leave-congress/#IDComment250389898</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : \&#039;Idol\&#039; Clarkson backs Ron Paul, stirs Twitter tempest</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.d633df7f7c7c83bf498110bef8fd0f81.151&amp;show_article=1#IDComment250383535</link>
<description>Good for you, Miss Clarkson. My respect for you, and your answer to the &amp;#039;phobics&amp;#039; was spot on. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.d633df7f7c7c83bf498110bef8fd0f81.151&amp;show_article=1#IDComment250383535</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236249768</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t trust Newt. I don&amp;#039;t trust Romney.  Why are these the front runners when they both are Big Government lite?  This is why we have primaries. Vote your conscious. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236249768</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236247970</link>
<description>But I don&amp;#039;t trust Newt. He is an intellectual dilletante and failed in his leadership position by 1996 when the Republicans essentially turned into big spaending  Democrats.  Brilliant speaker and historian. Not an effective leader. Just for the record, I will NEVER vote for a Socialist/Liberal/Progressive/Democrat. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236247970</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236244572</link>
<description>I agree. Gingrich failed in his leadership role and let the Republicans essentially turn into big spending Democrats by 1996. It turned me off completely, and although I have always voted against the Democrats, it was usually holding my nose as I voted for a Republican. I&amp;#039;m done with the &amp;#039;leaders&amp;#039; that get selected by the GOP. I have moved my allegiance to Ron Paul, who has displayed a steady consistancy to following the Constitution for all these years. His quirkier stuff will not harm the country like it will if any of the other Candidates become elected. Sorry to say it, but I think it is too little too late for the GOP. Ron Paul believes in the Constitution, as do I. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236244572</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236241339</link>
<description>They will quote the Devil himself, if it serves their purpose. They are whores for power. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236241339</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236240688</link>
<description>Glenn Beck: WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING??????  You just gave the Democrats a nuclear bomb.  Thanks for that- NOT! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236240688</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236239665</link>
<description>Agreed. It was a stupid comment giving credence to the very lie that the Progressives/Socialists/Marxists would like everyone to believe. The TEA party is as far from race consideration as Obama is a Constitutionalist. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236239665</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Et Tu, Beck? - Part III: Erratic Multimedia Star Pulls Race Card Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236238276</link>
<description>I consider myself a TEA party follower, but I cannot abide either Gingrich or  Romney as they ARE Big Government men. Either one, however is better than Obama, but that is saying very little. What is this nonsense about race? I have come to the conclusionm that the only candidate that I will support is Ron Paul. Never thought I would say it, but he is steafast in his defense of the Constitution, and his nuttier stuff will not destroy the country. Gingrich will lead us off the cliff, but just more slowly , as will Obama. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/12/10/et-tu-beck-part-iii-erratic-multimedia-star-pulls-race-card-against-tea-party/#IDComment236238276</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Carter sees tea party parallels to his 1976 run</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9IBN1L80&show_article=1#IDComment100033727</link>
<description> God Bless Ronald Reagan for steamrolling this schmuck. He is a  pro-Arab, anti-semitic, Constitution hating, big spending, left-wing nutjob. Why is he still alive? Won&amp;#039;t Syria take him, PLEASE? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9IBN1L80&show_article=1#IDComment100033727</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Carter sees tea party parallels to his 1976 run</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9IBN1L80&show_article=1#IDComment100033011</link>
<description>Once a Fool, always a Fool. GET OUT, YOU LIBERAL LOSER! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9IBN1L80&show_article=1#IDComment100033011</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Family asked to pay for car damage after dog run over</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77534671</link>
<description>I suspect that you have been drinking heavily. How could you deduce things that are not in the article, which this sounds like. Go to detox... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 18:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77534671</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Family asked to pay for car damage after dog run over</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77534286</link>
<description>Lol- we know who you voted for! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 18:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77534286</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Family asked to pay for car damage after dog run over</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77533783</link>
<description>&amp;quot;&amp;quot;We&amp;#039;ve lost a member of our family but we&amp;#039;re supposed to pay for the damage to her bumper? That&amp;#039;s just wrong,&amp;quot; daughter Katherine Flemming said. &amp;quot;  It was wrong to let &amp;#039;the family member&amp;#039; run into the street in front of a moving vehicle, endangering the life of the driver. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 18:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77533783</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Family asked to pay for car damage after dog run over</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77533429</link>
<description>There is nothing hyper-litigious about it. It is about business. The car owner had insurance because he bought it. The insurance company paid out. Who is RESPONSIBLE for the damage? The insurance company? No. The driver? Maybe, but those facts aren&amp;#039;t provided and only fools speculate. Are the pet owners responsible? Yes, if the pet was off the leash and out in the street.  I don&amp;#039;t love &amp;#039;BIG&amp;#039; business, or &amp;#039;BIG&amp;#039; government, but I recognize a need for a modest amount of both. Too many people in America (and I understand that this occurred in Canada) are of the opinion that someone else has to pay for their mistakes when things go wrong.  That is why the America is going bankrupt.  I agree that it is a poor business decision, but only in the respect that it is getting a slanted news coverage.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 18:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77533429</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Family asked to pay for car damage after dog run over</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77530099</link>
<description>What if they were the second-to-last insurance company on the moon. Would you use them then? For Anything? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 18:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.ce790ff71ff6bbbca9e18d3940bfe8d9.531&amp;show_article=1#IDComment77530099</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>