Autymn D. C.

Autymn D. C.

36p

39 comments posted · 20 followers · following 0

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 1 reply · +1 points

I can't [fall]; my case is perfect and immune.

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 0 replies · +1 points

I'm not a he, blind cretin (The Francs broke Latin and the Normans English.), nor am I friends with conservatives, Kristians, or politicians.

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 0 replies · +1 points

A word has one, first, foremost, best meaning; some meanings which come after that are wrong:

fast
long
thin, thick
quick
meat
guy
nice
deer
man

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 0 replies · +1 points

They do not at all, troll. I "hector"? What does this mean; I'm not a coward, don't thole dumbasses and liars and shysters and slanderers, and care about my and everyone's beliefs as they farly reach and touch our lives.

A gun is too impersonal.

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 0 replies · +1 points

What is creepy is your knee-jerk ungrounded attitudes as one of many American sheep. You must believe the Earth is flat, brain cells don't bud, and sex is a sin worse than murder.

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 0 replies · +1 points

Sex is not wrong; football, laws, and Americans are wrong.

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 3 replies · +1 points

And what do you justify, fake names, blind hatred, and hýpocritical prejudice of the will of persons as the constitution sets up?

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 0 replies · +2 points

Neither NAMBLA nor a troll; you would be the troll. The internet is full of dumbasses who toss words without knowan their meaning.

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 0 replies · +2 points

(looks at Wikipedia). Not at all, deluded troll.

371 weeks ago @ Wonkette - Ex-Gay Candidate So Ch... · 0 replies · +2 points

"a child": see last post; everyone is "a child". It was not her child. "too young to consent" by what, the law? society? Either way, you made it clear you didn't care if two 13-yeareds had sex [even thouh it's still illegal], so the youngness and sex are not the problem. Your problem is with the adult, which makes you hýpocritical. Also, junior high students are not kids.