<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/535835</link>
		<description>Comments by Willers</description>
<item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : 5/12/09: The President Announces Some Of His Plans For Health Care, Industry Seems To Be On Board</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/05/12/51209-the-president-announces-some-of-his-plans-for-health-care-industry-seems-to-be-on-board/#IDComment21327885</link>
<description>You are right. The &amp;quot;you guys&amp;quot; failed in the &amp;quot;small government&amp;quot; department. They got caught up in the yes, yes yes that grew the government. Those &amp;quot;morons&amp;quot; should have said NO a long time ago.   Here are two examples. NO government mandate requiring banks make unrealistic loans to folks who could never meet their financial obligations: we probably wouldn&amp;#039;t even be in this mess. No TARP: the greedy/poorly managed banks and companies would be bankrupt and gone and the honorable banks and companies would be  thriving. That&amp;#039;s competition and capitalism.   Sometimes NO is the CORRECT answer, so don&amp;#039;t dis it. I&amp;#039;d prefer the government to do NOthing rather than throw non-existent money at problems that will work themselves out if we just let them alone.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/05/12/51209-the-president-announces-some-of-his-plans-for-health-care-industry-seems-to-be-on-board/#IDComment21327885</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>