gdp's Comments

Big Government : Obama Targets Gingrich in Energy Speech

Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:40:09 +0000

Here come the idiots......PieceACandy and Spartacus....the Know Nothing Bloggers. Saul Alinsky tactics. Don't know the answers, change the subject. And, lie like Obama. We have uncovered a couple of Obama-lites in the thread. You can't "google"....stay tune..... I'll provide you answers. Most High School graduates know the answers or know how to look them up. PieceACandy is the obvious "fact smart" person here. But, she can't comprehend the subject matter. The questions obviously relate to the subject in the 'real' world. PieceACandy...If you can't contribute in a meaningful manner.....Butt-Out.

Big Government : Obama Targets Gingrich in Energy Speech

Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:39:54 +0000

Big Government : Obama Targets Gingrich in Energy Speech

Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:39:12 +0000

Big Government : Obama Targets Gingrich in Energy Speech

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:53:35 +0000

No responses. Shows how stupid Bloggers are---Know Nothings, spewing hate and lies on the internet.

Big Government : Obama Targets Gingrich in Energy Speech

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:01:22 +0000

Let's see how smart you are. How many gallons in a barrel? How many gallons of gasoline per gallon of oil? How much does it cost to transport a gallon of gasoline to the gas station from the refinery? How much per barrel of oil does it cost to drill? How much does it cost to refine a barrell of oil? How much capital investment does it cost to build a refinery? How much does an oil tanker cost to build and operate? How much capital investment is required for the drilling equipment? What does "Downstream" and "Upstream" mean in the oil bidness?

Breitbart.tv : Specter: Santorum Lied

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:42:58 +0000

You numbn&ts. Why don't you ask Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) what he thinks of Santorum? Let's get Senator Toomey's response. Sen Toomey fought back after Santorum the Traitor abandoned him in 2004 to win in 2010. Yep, thanks to Tea Party support, not the evangelical wing.

Breitbart.tv : Specter: Santorum Lied

Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:37:52 +0000

Santorum Lied. Yes, the HOLIER THAN THOU republican candidate LIED. I hope you Evangelicals are happy with your candidate. You are killing the GOP. Now, we will be stuck with the Establishmnet candidate, Romney.

Big Government : Santorum Calls Out Washington's False Prophets

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:33:33 +0000

Catholic Santorum attacking Protestants. I wonder how the Evangelicals feel about his view now, since they are the reason he has gotten this far in the election cycle. I said before and will say again the Evangelicals are the achilles heel of the GOP. By forcing HOLIER THAN THOU candidates upon us, with their endorsements will get Obama re-elected. The Evangelicals vote heavily in the GOP primaryes and then vote Democrat in the General Election. Wake up People!!!

Breitbart.tv : Santorum Rips Romney & Obama; Gets CPAC Standing Ovation

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:39:38 +0000

CPAC should have been a triumphal moment for Rick Santorum. His sweep of election contests this week put a gale-force wind in his campaign’s sails. At this week’s “Wednesday Meeting” of center-right organizations and activists, hosted by Grover Norquist, there was palpable excitement about the results and Santorum’s prospects. CPAC attendees are a natural base for Santorum, who overall the other nominees has the more consistent, traditional conservative record. Talking to attendees, it was clear they wanted to believe in Santorum. Their hearts were with him, even if their minds were nagged by questions of his electability. Today’s speech was a tailor-made opportunity to put these fears to rest. He whiffed. To be sure, Santorum’s CPAC speech was better than his normal stump speech, which tends to get bogged down in legislative and policy minutia. He attempted to provide an over-arching vision or narrative for his candidacy. But, his performance was rather lackluster. He received a warm reception from the crowd, but not the stirring response he was primed to receive. His biggest missed opportunity, though, was dispelling doubts about his electability. His speech contained just a tinge too much of the kind of whining that plagues underdog campaigns. Complaining about “pundits” or the “establishment” or bemoaning one’s lack of financial resources only reinforces the belief that one’s campaign is a long-shot. Coming off three solid victories in a week, this was a mistake. Santorum has won four of the first 8 contests. Speaking to a crowd with a potential strong base of support, he should have assumed the mantle of frontrunner. Instead, he crowned himself the conservative base’s favorite remaining nominee who can’t win the nomination.

Breitbart.tv : Perry To Run Again

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:38:14 +0000

Big Government : New World Bank Report Shows Large Public Sectors Reduce Economic Growth

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:01:45 +0000

Mitchell gets economics right everytime. He ties the economy to politics better than anyone in America. His message must get out if we are going to defeat Obama and the Socialists.

Big Government : New World Bank Report Shows Large Public Sectors Reduce Economic Growth

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:59:37 +0000

We must invoke the 10th Amendment, otherwise our Republic is doomed.

Big Government : Obamacare and the Constitution

Tue, 7 Feb 2012 00:38:20 +0000

where ever they want to. maybe 1st they should go to thier family, then friends, and then thewir church. if they are dieing maybe they are likely to be looking for salvation

Big Government : One Year Later, Another Look at Obamanomics vs. Reaganomics

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:31:44 +0000

Difference between Bush and Obama: Bush was a Socialist and did not know it. Obama is a Socialist and knows it, and he is proud of it.

Big Government : Obamacare and the Constitution

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:55:45 +0000

On your 2 points #1. No where in the US Constitution does it give ANY citizen the RIGHT to HealthCare. That maybe in Canada's constitution but not ours, so your argument here is a non-starter. Canada= 25 Million people, US= 310 Million. Probably a good thing that the "right" to healthcare does not exist. #2. Correct, "Welfare" is in the the Preamble. It says PROMOTE Common Welfare....not PROVIDE. Big, big difference, suggest you get a dictionary.

Conservative Byte : Laura Ingraham: The Tea Party Hits a Wall

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:43:24 +0000

Ingraham is another of the establishment talking heads who think they can influence the political process. Ingraham, Coulter, and Malkin are in the same cess-pool believing their own BullSh!t and self-importance. Here's a Fact, Jack ---- The GOP WILL LOSE to Obama and the Democrats November 2012. If the Republican Establishment continues to bash the Tea Party, they will ensure the destruction of our Country by getting Obama re-elected... maybe that is what they want anyway.

Big Government : Obamacare and the Constitution

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:30:02 +0000

On your 2 points
#1. No where in the US Constitution does it give ANY citizen the RIGHT to HealthCare. That maybe in Canada's constitution but not ours, so your argument here is a non-starter. Canada= 25 Million people, US= 310 Million. Probably a good thing that the \"right\" to healthcare does not exist.
#2. Correct, \"Welfare\" is in the the Preamble. It says PROMOTE Common Welfare....not PROVIDE. Big, big difference, suggest you get a dictionary.

Big Government : Obamacare and the Constitution

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 04:27:42 +0000

I could give a ratsazz about the mandate. It means nothing to me. But, to have a GIGANTIC law that effects all the 310 Million people is beyond even your comprehension. Let the states figure it out. If your State doesn't do what you want. LEAVE IT, and go to MA.

Big Government : Obamacare and the Constitution

Thu, 2 Feb 2012 03:57:23 +0000

10th Amendment, numbnuts. Read it!!

Big Government : Merkel and Sarkozy Propose Higher Taxes to 'Strengthen Growth Now'

Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:10:17 +0000

".... the highest period of GDP growth occurring when our highest tax rate was sky high....." WRONG and a LIE. Your analysis is flawed and too clever by half. when tax rates were sky high, the rich dodged taxes by using tax havens and trusts. ask the Rockerfellers and Kennedys