<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/315143</link>
		<description>Comments by VinceHugh</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama to Congress : don\&#039;t \&#039;muck up\&#039; recovery</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.509c6be00a165aa5f8d8dd1384c905e8.141&amp;show_article=1#IDComment283133962</link>
<description>And what has Obama done to aid the &amp;#039;recovery&amp;#039;?  Nothing.  First, there is no recovery.  Our business people have fought against Obama to get some growth, but its nothing compared to what it could be if he would lift much of the regulations that business&amp;#039;s have to face not to mention the costly Obamacare. He is a loser and trying to tell congress &amp;#039;not to screw it up&amp;#039; is outragious.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.509c6be00a165aa5f8d8dd1384c905e8.141&amp;show_article=1#IDComment283133962</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sarah:  &#039;Annoy A Liberal. Vote Newt&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sarah-annoy-a-liberal-vote-newt/#IDComment278563597</link>
<description>The liberal media and the establishment republicans have a hard press going to make sure a true conservative like Newt doesn&amp;#039;t get elected.  Sarah Palin is right-on. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sarah-annoy-a-liberal-vote-newt/#IDComment278563597</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Chavez wants good relations with US if Obama elected</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.782ee6697adf10e19e14035be0f1302b.121&amp;show_article=1#IDComment277684688</link>
<description>Outstanding! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.782ee6697adf10e19e14035be0f1302b.121&amp;show_article=1#IDComment277684688</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Chavez wants good relations with US if Obama elected</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.782ee6697adf10e19e14035be0f1302b.121&amp;show_article=1#IDComment277678292</link>
<description>Obama has done nothing to hurt Chavez for the nearly 4 years he&amp;#039;s been president...that is why Chavez is supporting him.  Be assured if Obama get re-elected, Chavez will just continue his efforts to persuade other South American countries to be anti-USA.  Whereas Chavez knows if someone like Newt gets elected, there will be some very strong measures to stop Chavez anti American movement. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.782ee6697adf10e19e14035be0f1302b.121&amp;show_article=1#IDComment277678292</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Who Is Rachel Maddow?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276053792</link>
<description>Just looking at him, and being on MSMBC, I assume he&amp;#039;s an Obama supporter? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/who-is-rachel-maddow/#IDComment276053792</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268721623</link>
<description>I can&amp;#039;t imagine a divorced wife saying anything good about her husband.  Then when you include a hostile liberal network, ABC, be assured the whole intent is to hurt Gingrich bad.  I think it would be best to air it before the election.  Either way, both Newt and ABC will be hurt since this is a very private matter and should not be publicized in the first place.  The press has no scruples. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268721623</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iranian president to tour US foes in Latin America</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.357d237547430a5a9d96e54a1733d83a.5f1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment257643513</link>
<description>Any country in Latin or South America has nothing to fear against the United States. The only conflict is if a country could be used as a tool by a potential enemy to create a military threat to our country (Cuba). Both China and Russia would love to set up military establishments in that area because its close to the USA. Venezuela is a good example of creeping enemies using Chavez as a puppet to be a threat to the United States. Ahmadinejad knows the weakness of certain countries, and is trying to have an influence. The USA provides huge amounts of aid and jobs to these countries and in almost all cases are very good friends. In the case of Chavez he turned against America because of our shear size and wealth, we leave an economic imprint anywhere we go. It&amp;#039;s not an evil thing, but a good thing and countries should use it to their advantage rather than against us. A good example of self destruction is Cuba. Had Castro wanted to be a friend of the USA, his country would be wealthy and happy. Americans don&amp;#039;t feel guilty about our success (except for some democrats) because it was earned, not by military conquer, but hard work and the economic policy of capitalism. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Jan 2012 12:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.357d237547430a5a9d96e54a1733d83a.5f1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment257643513</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : \&#039;Idol\&#039; Clarkson backs Ron Paul, stirs Twitter tempest</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.d633df7f7c7c83bf498110bef8fd0f81.151&amp;show_article=1#IDComment250762591</link>
<description>This is the same problem we had when Obama got elected. That is both him and Ron Paul went after the very young...those just out of high school or in first year or so of college, who are very impressionable by charisma and theory, but not old enough for experience and take a bye on realism, but get behind these candidates and do the hard door to door work. Paul is a great theorists and idealist, but he doesn&amp;#039;t appreciate or understand realism and that there actually are people out there will take advantage of your &amp;#039;treat everyone nice and they will be your friend&amp;#039; theories. Hopefully the adult voters learned our lesson from Obama, and won&amp;#039;t let the youngsters make our decisions for us again. Our country can&amp;#039;t handle it. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.d633df7f7c7c83bf498110bef8fd0f81.151&amp;show_article=1#IDComment250762591</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US to release women action plan: Obama official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.36250fd7ea7d7c41d8cfe510d0060488.1c1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment242674318</link>
<description>In the last election Obama got college kids activated for him knowing they were naive and susceptable to charasmatic presentation.  He now thinks since he&amp;#039;s losing many college kids, that women will be his next victim and susceptable to his charisma as the kids were.  How arrogant and an insult to women.  Using the gender card is a mistake.  Republicans have already shown they pick a candidate based on principals...thus the huge following for Sarah Palin as an example, she was an outstanding conservative.  The people that destroyed her were the liberal/democrat media that can&amp;#039;t stand a conservative women.  Look what they also did to Christine O&amp;#039;Donnel in Delaware or Sharon Angle in Nevada.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.36250fd7ea7d7c41d8cfe510d0060488.1c1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment242674318</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breitbart Issues Bashir $10,000 Challenge: Prove You Read &#039;Righteous Indignation&#039;, Take Lie Detector</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-issues-bashir-10000-challenge-prove-you-read-righteous-indignation-take-lie-detector-test/#IDComment145077981</link>
<description>Probably one of the greatest take down of an extreme liberal (Bashir) was when I saw the Breitbart TV interview with MSNBC&amp;#039;s Bashir.  From now on Breitbart will be my hero.  He made Bashir look like a total fool in trying to lie about what Breitbart said.  I highly recommend people google that interview and see how MSNBC and the left try to take things out of context and curve the message to mislead people.  Breitbart stopped him in his tracks. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breitbart-issues-bashir-10000-challenge-prove-you-read-righteous-indignation-take-lie-detector-test/#IDComment145077981</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : ABC News Staffer Warns GOP Against ObamaCare Repeal</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119094709</link>
<description>Since no one I know watches ABC anymore, who in the heck is this gal.  She is obviously a very young naive cool-aid drinker of Obama and another media robot of liberal causes.  The American people sent a message in November after seeing what Obamacare and Obama and his democrats were doing to our country.  Obviously this &amp;#039;Amy&amp;#039; doesn&amp;#039;t understand whats happening outside of her narrow NY/Hollywood liberal world. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Jan 2011 00:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119094709</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Atlanta&#039;s First White Christmas Since 1882</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/atlantas-first-white-christmas-since-1862/#IDComment118215724</link>
<description>Wrong, with the exception of the blacks in the city itself, Atlanta suburbs and the rest of Georgia voted strongly Republican.  McCain carried the state.  Plus they have 2 conservative Republican senators.  &amp;#039;Gore&amp;#039; is a dirty word in Georgia.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/atlantas-first-white-christmas-since-1862/#IDComment118215724</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Atlanta&#039;s First White Christmas Since 1882</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/atlantas-first-white-christmas-since-1862/#IDComment118137015</link>
<description>I use to live in Atlanta and know that snow is a rarity.  It comes once or twice a year, makes everything white, then is gone in one or two days.  The affluent northern suburbs of Atlanta, with all the hills and trees, is absolutely beautiful when it snows.  Miss the place. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/atlantas-first-white-christmas-since-1862/#IDComment118137015</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Nuclear treaty \&#039;goes easy on Russia\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cdc63f449543115516a6ee1f2c569704.171&amp;show_article=1#IDComment118111795</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s really unfortunate that  the NY liberal media is so for Obama that it gives favorable coverage to those who supported the treaty and very little and negative coverage to those Republicans who were against it.  The whole Obama media support was to give him a political advantage come 2012 dispite the damage this treaty can do to our country.  Plus, the media&amp;#039;s coverage of the don&amp;#039;t-ask-don&amp;#039;t-tell vote as if everyone who is &amp;#039;with it&amp;#039; is cool and up to date, when in fact the majority of Americans are against it.  These things will come back to haunt the democrats. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.cdc63f449543115516a6ee1f2c569704.171&amp;show_article=1#IDComment118111795</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US senator: Gay ban tied to Russia treaty</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.56ebdf0712e722f2c904a46ee1aa03d3.5c1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment116604968</link>
<description>If you&amp;#039;ve served in the military you know that allowing gays in is a bad idea.  Since being gay means you are attracted to the same sex, for example in a shower with a bunch of naked men (common in the military), knowing that the person next to you is gay and could be learing at your body, could easily create a bad response since a &amp;#039;straight&amp;#039; person simply can&amp;#039;t comprehend being attacted to the same sex.  However, if they are to allow gays, why not just let men and women shower together??  Now that makes sense and may solve the problem of getting enough people to join up.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.56ebdf0712e722f2c904a46ee1aa03d3.5c1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment116604968</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Palin hits back at Obama, media after slip-up</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0c72364653fa48fde37dd48eded0946e.501&amp;show_article=1#IDComment112408203</link>
<description>The media knew Sarah was a threat to their liberal agenda and their efforts to get Obama elected when McCain picked her as VP and she completely re-energized the Republican Party. If not for her McCain&amp;#039;s loss would have been far worse than it was.  This woman&amp;#039;s threat to liberalism is so effective that the NY/Hollywood media has an all out campaign to discredit her by making fun of virtually everything she says....as they did Reagan. The media does a good job on this and a lot of people think she is an illiterate because they are a victim of media soundbites. Notice how the media never discusses the issues she stands for...but only attack her personally, because they know the issues she stands for are right-on with Americans. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0c72364653fa48fde37dd48eded0946e.501&amp;show_article=1#IDComment112408203</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Palin hits back at Obama, media after slip-up</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0c72364653fa48fde37dd48eded0946e.501&amp;show_article=1#IDComment112297970</link>
<description>Yes, and Obama is outright brilliant!  That&amp;#039;s why your libs took such a beating a couple weeks ago.  It was all because of Tea Party activists and Independents who became educated after they were blindly led by the pro-Obama media what a great president he would be.  Looks like you were an Obama cool-aid liberal drinker who hasn&amp;#039;t yet realized what Palin and conservatives are all about.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0c72364653fa48fde37dd48eded0946e.501&amp;show_article=1#IDComment112297970</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Palin hits back at Obama, media after slip-up</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0c72364653fa48fde37dd48eded0946e.501&amp;show_article=1#IDComment112275803</link>
<description>Lets see, Sarah Palin is for sealing our borders, for profiling, for prayer in school, for stopping spending in DC, against gay marriage, against abortion, for making schools accountable for poor performance....I guess that makes her a right wing radical and explains why the media hates and fears her.  Notice how the media only attacks her personally, but never discusses the issues she stands for?   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0c72364653fa48fde37dd48eded0946e.501&amp;show_article=1#IDComment112275803</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Palin: If I Become a Distraction I Won&#039;t Run</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/palin-if-i-become-a-distraction-i-wont-run/#IDComment111701946</link>
<description>Sarah is probably one of the most brilliant people we have ever had run for president. She is right-on with what the core value of American beliefs as described in her books and speeches. The mainstream media recognized this when McCain picked her as VP and saw how she excited the Republican base. The media seeing that their handpicked candidate Barack Obama may be in trouble, started a campaign to vilify and ridicule Sarah to the point that even she couldn&amp;#039;t overcome the criticism...and of course Obama and the liberal media won. But the obviously blatant media biasness that hurt Palin stirred up the conservative base to support her conservative ideals and thus the &amp;#039;tea party&amp;#039; began. It was expected that blacks and students would go for Obama, but the independents were the ones that made the difference because they were generally not attuned to actual idealogical differences of the parties and believed the anti-Bush and anti-Palin soundbites...and naively voted for Obama. Since then they have become much more educated and automatically fell into the beliefs of the tea party movement and became Sarah Palin supporters. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/palin-if-i-become-a-distraction-i-wont-run/#IDComment111701946</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Carter sees tea party parallels to his 1976 run</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9IBMP400&show_article=1#IDComment99925421</link>
<description>I remember 1976 but there is a fundamental difference between then and now.  It all has to do with media control where you had a Democrat Carter running against an anti-media Republican family that basically consisted of the &amp;#039;silent majority&amp;#039;.  The difference was Carter was believed to be a &amp;#039;conservative&amp;#039; democrat, but a democrat, and therefore carried the south and kept the northeast democrats.  The rest of the nation was was stunned into silence because the NY media selected the news stories that were exposed to people because there was no FOX News Channel or visible Rush Limbaugh...so the media was pro democrat/liberal.   Now, with the Tea Party, you have voices that promote conservative values, and despite the mainstream media such as NBC, CBS, etc, which support very liberal candidates and views, the Tea Party (conservatives) have outlets and they better represent what the majority of Americans feel.  That is the difference.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9IBMP400&show_article=1#IDComment99925421</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>