gdp's Comments

FaithFreedom.org : SWITZERLAND: Pig found buried in the ground of a future mosque

Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:03:25 +0000

Muhammad stole all his religious ideal from the Jews. Nearly all stories and ideas in Quran are plagiarized from Torah and a few from Talmud. Jewish god did not like pigs, so Muhammad got his idea from the Jews, like most of his ideas.

FaithFreedom.org : SWITZERLAND: Pig found buried in the ground of a future mosque

Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:00:51 +0000

Well, if Mosques are Allah's house, then our job must be to make Allah homeless.

FaithFreedom.org : SWITZERLAND: Pig found buried in the ground of a future mosque

Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:59:54 +0000

Actually pigs are totally disgusting. I mean almost as disgusting as Allah and Muhammad.

FaithFreedom.org : SWITZERLAND: Pig found buried in the ground of a future mosque

Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:58:39 +0000

What do you mean "non-violent"? They killed the pigs!

FaithFreedom.org : Can There Ever Be Peace Between Muslims and Jews?

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:31:50 +0000

Actually I was open to the possibility that such verses are in Talmud. So I did some searching for them on the internet, and the only place I found them was on antisemitic websites. There are searchable talmuds online, but I could not find anything similar to what Babu is quoting. Now I think that perhaps he just is a Jew-hater.

FaithFreedom.org : Can There Ever Be Peace Between Muslims and Jews?

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:19:34 +0000

Actually I have read most of the Torah/OT. I don't recall any place there that calls for rape of anyone, let alone children. There are many violent passages, regarding the conquest of Canaan. The difference is that Jewish god tells Jews to conquer Canaan, the Muhammadan god tell Muslims to conquer all of the world. Jews are uninterested in world conquest. Uninterested in converting others.

FaithFreedom.org : Can There Ever Be Peace Between Muslims and Jews?

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:13:12 +0000

Actually you are correct. Jews are slow in realizing that today's Christians are different than just 40-50 years ago. Indeed historically Christians have murdered more Jews, but today the epicenter of antisemitism is in the Muslim world. It would be very important to wake up the Jewish people to the new reality. Likewise, leftist were less antisemitic just a couple generations ago, but today the right-wingers are much more supportive of Jews, while leftists became intensely antisemitic. Again, Jews have not adapted to this change. I am speaking form my own knowledge of my Jewish people. Believe me, I am often exasperated by this inflexible attitude. So, no, I don't think you are particularly antisemitic when you say what you just said.

FaithFreedom.org : Can There Ever Be Peace Between Muslims and Jews?

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:06:54 +0000

Here is what's wrong with us Jews: Most Jews are "liberal" because they imagine that antisemitism is just a part of a general oppression. That it is the same as anti-Black racism, and the "Islamophobia". Such liberal Jews think that they have a common cause with the "other oppressed minorities". They ignore that Black America are about 3 times more likely to be antisemitic than average, and that the overwhelming majority Muslims of Muslims are antisemitic. Another thing that is wrong with Jews is the unrequited love for Europe. Jews really want to be accepted by Europeans. They want to be part of Europe. They think that if they compromise with the Muslims, and give them some of their land, then Europeans will accept them. Perhaps even make Israel a part of EU. This is of course garbage. Antisemitism runs deep in Europe, and Europeans are not going to come to defense of Jews. But the hardest thing of all for the Jewish people to face is that they are ALONE, universally hated in both Christian and Muslim cultures just for the fact of being Jewish. The biggest longing in Jewish people is not to be "special" but on the contrary to be accepted and included. (Interestingly Hindus did not hate Jews, and because of that Jews in India dissolved into the general Indian population.) Also Chinese don't hate Jews, it is not part of their culture.

FaithFreedom.org : Can There Ever Be Peace Between Muslims and Jews?

Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:56:08 +0000

Dear Ali Sina, You are misinformed about the Jews in Germany: There were 522,000 Jews living in Germany in January 1933, only 214,000 were left by the eve of World War II. Jews did not have any chance to revolt against Hitler. They were not concentrated in one place, but scattered and assimilated. They were unarmed. Once the regime was established, even Germans did not really have any chance to rebel against Hitler. The system of terror was complete. Every staircase, had a spy, every building, every street, block. Nobody could even talk. Situation was still much worse in Poland and Ukraine than in Germany. There the local population was much more antisemitic, and actively participated in murder. While Polish partisans were supported by the Polish villagers, the Jewish partisans hiding in the forests were reported to the Germans by the same villagers. My mother's uncle was a leader of Jewish partisans in the forests of Eastern Poland, at the very end of the war, after his platoon won a battle with Germans, the antisemitic Poles betrayed and killed him. I don't think you can even begin to understand the depth and breath of antisemitism in Christian countries. It is not different from Islam. The very word Jew is and insult worse than "son-of-a-whore". (A common Polish insult.) The hatred changes intensity, currently Islam is more antisemitic. 100 years earlier, imperial Russia was the epicenter of antisemitism.

2012 Obama : Palin vs Obama 2012 Presidential Election

Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:11:00 +0000

Americans are insane to have elected the Mubarak Hussein Obama. Born to a Muslim father, raised by Muslim step father, he is legally Muslim and should he ever decide to apostatize he will be sought for beheading. Now, some people may think that "what's wrong with Muslim". They think that Islam is like other religions. The truth is that Islam is not a religion. It is a totalitarian system that controls every aspect of life: Personal, social, economical, political, legal and religious. The goal of Islam is to conquer the whole world and subjugate it to Sharia. Our Hussein President is doing everything in his power to destroy America, as America is the only power potentially capable of stopping the Muslim conquest of the world. The most powerful weapon of Islam is deception, takyya, the Hussein (Obama) is engaging in Takyya. His Marxist handlers love Islam because they hate America. They don't mind that Islam stands for everything contrary to the normal leftist goals: It stands for beating women, even for slavery. I don't care who Palin is, she may be good, may be bad. If the other choice is Obama Palin got my vote.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Afghan Resistance Statement: Information Clearing House: ICH

Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:01:01 +0000

Yes, indeed the "radical Islam" is false. There is no more radical Islam than there is radical Nazism. Anyone who reads the Islamic holy books (Koran, Sira, Hadith) will soon realize that Islam is a murderous colonialist ideology. The argument that Judaism and Christianity are equally murderous is false. The founder of Christianity was a peaceful man who never killed or hurt anyone. Christians have murdered tens of millions contrary to the example of Jesus. On the other hand Muhammad was a mass murderer, rapist, and child abuser (who raped a 9 years old girl-child.) Muhammedans, are engaging in murder according to the example of Muhammad. Christians do so against the teachings of their founder. Now about Jews and Muslims: Jews were only commanded by their Yahwe to conquer the land of Israel. A tiny land without many resources. On the other hand Muslims are commanded by their Allah to conquer the whole world. Jew have not interest in converting others to Judaism, or to impose the Jewish law on others. Jewish law/the Torah applies only to the Jewish people. On the other hand Muslims seek to impose Sharia on the whole world. The overwhelming majority of the text in the three "holy" Muslim books is about fighting the infidels. Now look at the Islamic world: some 57 countries and not one single one worth living in: No democracy, poor, filthy, uneducated, no freedom of expression. There are estimated some 10 000 women killed in "honor" killings each year, almost all of them in the Muslim countries. As the time goes, Muslims are left behind not only by the West, but also by the East Asians, India, East Europe, Russia. Everyone with the sorry exception of the sub-Saharan Africa. They are aware that their so called "civilization" is a failure, but instead of making the necessary changes, they are trying to destroy those whom are better than them. This humiliation and envy are the root of the modern Islamic re-awakening. Now there are of course good people everywhere, and not all Muslims are murderers. Not all Nazis were murderers either. Not all communists were murderers. This post is about Islam and of its perverted founder, not of the peaceful people who had the misfortune to be born to into the Muslim "religion".

Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\'s Islamic Defenders Front: "Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:29:07 +0000

InfidelAkbar,
I am impressed that you managed to read through it.

Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\'s Islamic Defenders Front: "Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:26:06 +0000

Indeed haven't heard of Gramsci. May have to Google for him one day.:)No, not communist in the least. Communism is an 19 Century defunct theory. I believe Game Theory will eventually replace the Marxist social \"science\". About Lennon we agree, great poet and song writer, but only a dreamer, not a realist.Christianity is not compatible with science, it is based on beliefs, science is based on perpetual doubt, inquiry. Christianity is revealed, science is discovered.

Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\'s Islamic Defenders Front: "Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:12:06 +0000

GlibMan,

When we analyse a situation we need to be logical. That does not mean that the author (me in this case) \"does not have a soul\".�
We are simply looking at the most realistic options to chose from. Where is our energy best invested.
Independent from our feelings about France, it has no chances for the world domination, not since�Napoleon. They are not even close to be the contenders.�
Our emotions and fantasies are not helpful when we are dealing with realities.

Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Fitzgerald: "A Muslim doesn\'t look to peace, security, education, work, or the love of

Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:52:00 +0000

The reason why Westerners don't understand what Koran is saying is "Tu Quoque". Most of accusations against Koran, can be also made against the Bible. The Westerners reason like this: If Western countries can be (somewhat) humane and civilized in spite of horrendous violence in the Bible, then Muslims can do the same in spite of Koran. Or they think that just as Bible can be interpreted to suit peaceful and modern conditions, so can Koran. They take the relatively civilized Western culture as a proof that a violent "holy" scripture, can be used in humane way. Additionally the "Tu Quoque" also is applied to show that Muslims are no more violent than the West. Certainly in the past, Christianity has killed hundreds of millions of infidels (especially in Americas and other colonies, in addition to the murder of millions of Jews and Pagans in Europe and murder of competing Christian sects throughout the history). Islam is indeed not different in this respect. The only difference that makes a difference is that the WEST today is no longer Christian, but post-Christian. However the "Tu Quoque" to this is that even the post-Christian West, is engaging in killing tens of millions of innocent people (as the case was in the 20 Century with WWI, WWII). Here too, the Muslims and their leftist useful idiots are right. The West is probably just as violent and Islam. So what's the difference? We are in a state of war, both sides are cruel, and I personally happened to have a preference: I would rather have MY SIDE win, and the other side lose. The other side has an advantage, they are more honest about being at war, we are losing the war, by not acknowledging that we are at war. We are pretending to be at peace, and keep supplying our enemy with trillions of dollars which they use to fight us. I doubt that we could have won against Nazi Germany if we supplied them with trillions of dollars while fighting them. It is war, so do the simple thing, go to the Muslims and use the military power to take OUR oil that happened to be under the sands that they have conquered some time in the past. Re-conquer them, and f**k the enemy. In war, the only thing that counts is winning. Moralizing is just propaganda for the deluded masses.

Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\'s Islamic Defenders Front: "Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee

Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:01:16 +0000

This is the common definition of "Colony". If on the other hand you prefer a different definition, that does not include exploitation of the resources and the people, by foreign powers, there may be nothing wrong with "colony". I am not aware of any other case where a word "colony" is used and where there is no exploitation of resources by the home base. This was the case with India, Americas, Australia, Africa, when they were colonized. On the other hand, if your definition applies, than the Arab conquest of Palestine in teh 7th century should be characterized as colonial as well.

Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\'s Islamic Defenders Front: "Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee

Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:52:20 +0000

GOM I don't think I can say anything more to you. It is not ad hominem argument, because it is not an argument at all, Just my impression of you: And my impression is that indeed you are incapable of seeing the huge inequality, the totally different standards that you and the general propaganda is applying to the Jewish people, then to every other nation. And I did answer your question: If the strangers (that is Hawaiian people) came to me and demanded that I move off their land, I would respect their decision. I believe that you are incapable to see the perspective I presented, there is not much more I can say. Therefore I will end my conversation with you here. Your are welcome to answer if you want to have the last word.

Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\'s Islamic Defenders Front: "Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee

Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:47:41 +0000

You are surprising me. I have explained to you in detail than Israel was established as a result of diligent work of generations upon generation of Jewish national struggle. The current state was in the making for over 100 years before in gained independence. At that time there was already de-facto Jewish state of "Palestine". As for free immigration, actually the opposite was true, Arabs were allowed free immigration by the Brits, but not Jews. If it was not for the Holocaust, there would have been many times more Jews living happily in Israel today. Jews were bared from immigration by the Brits, but they fought the Brits and finally gained independence. The Jewish immigration to Palestine was illegal. The most surprising is your insistence that "Palestine" was somehow an "Arab land".

Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\'s Islamic Defenders Front: "Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee

Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:40:47 +0000

GOM while I wish what you said was true, it unfortunately is not. The world is just as nationalistic and just as ethocentric today, as it was 100 years ago, or perhaps even more. So under current condition, on current stage of development of humanity, population transfers are actually saving lives (rather than having a slaughter going on between neighbors as the case was in India Pakistan, etc). Also, and equally importantly, population transfers allow a true diversity of cultures. In the principle this is not different from people having clubs: Women only club is OK, and allows women certain freedom that a mixed club would not. Likewise "African American" club is ok, and so is every other exclusive society. On a larger scale the same applies to countries formed around shared ethnic, religious, or cultural identity. This is especially morally justifiable when the country in question is very small (like Israel) and where the population is transfered to countries with the same language, religion and culture. Just like I would would accept if I had to be transfered to California. So again, I agree with you that it would be nice, if ethnicity, etc, did not matter, and if people would welcome each others differences. In the real world, the Jewish people were butchered for maintaining their difference. So in the real world, the only way Jew can survive as a distinct culture (using "culture" in a broad sense including religion, language, nationality, traditions, etc), is if they have their country. And naturally the best suited country is their ancestral homeland. This is the country where each each mountain, each desert each city is connected with their history. The country where they can dig the ground and find 2000 years old inscriptions which their children can read without dictionary! The truly progressive thing is to support the diversity of nations on our planet.

Jihad Watch : Jihad Watch: Indonesia\'s Islamic Defenders Front: "Indonesia is a peaceful country and does not nee

Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:27:01 +0000

The point I am making is that anti-Zionists are applying double standards. The same countries that supported transfer of Germans out of Sudetenland, condemned Jews for transfering Pals just 15 miles East. I am also suggesting that population transfer is internationally acceptable solution when creating national a home for a people. Additionally your characterisation of the events of 1948 as "Zionist Invasion" is indeed antisemitic. The creation of the modern state of Israel has taken over 100 years. It was not an invasion at all, the land did not belong to any other nation. There was no Palestinian nation. This idea was invented in 1960. Before that, Arabs living in the Land of Israel considered themselves Syrians, Bedouins, Egyptian, even Iraqi, but mostly Syrian. After WWI Arabs were granted a huge territory where they could establish their national home. Jews too, were give a territory, a very small one where they could establish their home, and end the world longest and most tragic refugee crisis. In 1947 and 1948 Arabs started a war against Jewish state, they lost the war. This is hardly an "invasion". Besides the very word "Palestine" is deliberately antisemitic, just like the term West-Bank. "Palestine" was used by Romans to humiliated Jews, the true name of the country was Iudea, and it's inhabitants were called Iude (English Jew). So if you consider it OK for Czech to have a country without Germans, why do you oppose expulsion of Arabs from Israel? And if you oppose both, than why are you not equally strongly voicing your condemnation of Arab countries that expelled their entire Jewish populations? After all 20% of Israeli population is Arab, compare this to .001% in Egypt, Syria and Lebanon, and 0% in Jordan, Palestinian Authority, and Gaza. Who is racist here?