<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/3973271</link>
		<description>Comments by VeritasModo</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305779547</link>
<description>This is nuts, what a loss to society, just don&amp;#039;t understand. And &amp;quot;natural causes?&amp;quot; I hate to be Mr Conspiracy, but everybody would expect it with such a high profile person, but the first thing that comes to mind is the Alexander Litvinenko poisoning by radioactive polonium-210. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/in-memoriam-andrew-breitbart-1969-2012/#IDComment305779547</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Anti-Free Speech Totalitarians: Occupy Activists Shout Down Pro-Israel Speakers </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/anti-free-speech-totalitarians-occupy-activists-shout-down-pro-israel-speakers/#IDComment303269364</link>
<description>I thought so too, kind of like how fast people react now when a loon goes off in a flight, they don&amp;#039;t wait around for Air Marshall Joe to kick in, they stomp their ass. Yes, the silent majority is waking up finally!! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/anti-free-speech-totalitarians-occupy-activists-shout-down-pro-israel-speakers/#IDComment303269364</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Anti-Free Speech Totalitarians: Occupy Activists Shout Down Pro-Israel Speakers </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/anti-free-speech-totalitarians-occupy-activists-shout-down-pro-israel-speakers/#IDComment303211039</link>
<description>So here&amp;#039;s an idea, every non-OWS individual that goes to these type events needs to bring one of those canned air fog horns just in case an OWS person or group of the idiots show up, and drown their asses out when they start with their banter till they get the message and leave. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/anti-free-speech-totalitarians-occupy-activists-shout-down-pro-israel-speakers/#IDComment303211039</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Comedy: Olbermann, Daily Kos Founder Attack Breitbart; ‘No One Really Cares’ About #Occupy Rapes</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-and-daily-kos-founder-attack-breitbart-no-one-really-cares-about-occupy-rapes/#IDComment291971233</link>
<description>Even my Democrat leaning friends think MSNBC is liberal porn that sickens them, so does it even matter what they have to say? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-and-daily-kos-founder-attack-breitbart-no-one-really-cares-about-occupy-rapes/#IDComment291971233</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Dem Schakowsky: Americans Don&#039;t Actually Follow Christian Faith  </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-schakowsky-americans-dont-actually-follow-christian-faith/#IDComment291894050</link>
<description>This is what we&amp;#039;re up against; people that speak for all of us, haven&amp;#039;t a clue as to what the hell they&amp;#039;re talking about, and yet think they&amp;#039;re an authority figure on the subject at hand. I&amp;#039;m Deist, not Christian, I don&amp;#039;t have to be a Christian to follow much of the Judeo/Christian values our country was founded on. This idiot does not speak for me, she does not speak for America, and she has no idea what she is talking about. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-schakowsky-americans-dont-actually-follow-christian-faith/#IDComment291894050</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv :  Houston&#039;s Final Performance</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/houstons-final-performance/#IDComment291661518</link>
<description>Your link is BS, looks like some kind of pay per click crap. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/houstons-final-performance/#IDComment291661518</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : O&#039;Donnell Denigrates Asian Actress For Denigrating Asians</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/odonnell-denigrates-asian-actress-for-denigrating-asians/#IDComment286730281</link>
<description>So how would numb nuts OD react if the actor came forward and it turned out she was not a native English speaker and that was actually her real &amp;quot;stereotypical&amp;quot; accent? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 03:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/odonnell-denigrates-asian-actress-for-denigrating-asians/#IDComment286730281</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Miller Humbles Piers Over &#039;Evil&#039; Breitbart Remark</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/miller-humbles-piers-over-evil-breitbart-remark/#IDComment261841267</link>
<description>Yeah, they did it to me too, same thread. I got hit even harder. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/miller-humbles-piers-over-evil-breitbart-remark/#IDComment261841267</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Dead Man Voting: O&#039;Keefe Exposes Troubling Ballot Policies In New Hampshire</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/dead-man-voting-okeefe-exposes-troubling-ballot-policies-in-new-hampshire/#IDComment261833851</link>
<description>Should be a felony for anybody that actually casts a vote they are not authorized to make. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/dead-man-voting-okeefe-exposes-troubling-ballot-policies-in-new-hampshire/#IDComment261833851</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261775131</link>
<description>Holy crap dude, what is your beef, you have serious reading comprehension issues.The post is about Ron Paul&amp;#039;s integrity being in question by running as something he is not. It&amp;#039;s not about a party hijacked  by non-conservatives, it&amp;#039;s about RINO&amp;#039;s! Ron Paul is a RINO. I agree that most of them are, I never said anything positive about any of the other candidates, I didn&amp;#039;t even mention any of them, read all my post in this thread. Why are you guys so hell bent on arguing a factual statement that you admit yourself to be true? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261775131</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Univision Introduces Us To Mitt Romney’s Cousins In Chihuahua, Mexico </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/univision-introduces-us-to-mitt-romneys-cousins-in-chihuahua-mexico/#IDComment261766335</link>
<description>Yeah, they unloaded on me just for having the audacity of asking why he&amp;#039;s running as a Republican instead of a Libertarian. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/univision-introduces-us-to-mitt-romneys-cousins-in-chihuahua-mexico/#IDComment261766335</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261763365</link>
<description>Well, since I was born in the 60&amp;#039;s, and RP was just starting to figure himself out politically around that time, it&amp;#039;s really hard to say if your statement is accurate or not with the exception that all of his publicly spoken views have actually been Libertarian. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261763365</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261760760</link>
<description>So, the truth is out. You are saying what most believe, and exactly what I posted in the first place, he&amp;#039;s not a Republican but chooses to hold the title for the air time, for exposure, and hopes that he can make an impact in an arena where he would otherwise not be taken seriously if he ran as a Libertarian. Well there you have it folks, I got red thumbed for speaking the truth, pathetic really. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261760760</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261750616</link>
<description>Sure, I understand perfectly, it&amp;#039;s you who don&amp;#039;t understand. Go read up, the Libertarian party&amp;#039;s official web page spells out pretty clearly how Ron Paul syncs up with their issues, whereas the GOP&amp;#039;s official web page clearly is not in line with many of the same views RP has. And that is the meat of my original post that garnered so much hatred from off the cuff posters like yourself, I said over and over that much of what Ron Paul says is how I think, I agree with probably 90% of what he preaches, but I&amp;#039;m not hooked on a candidate like he&amp;#039;s a Messiah like many of you are. He has flaws, they all do, but his biggest problem in my eyes is he&amp;#039;s not a real Republican so should have the integrity to run as Libertarian. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261750616</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261746449</link>
<description>Nobody is out of line here but you making accusations. He&amp;#039;s 76 years old, he has a very limited life span.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261746449</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261744532</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s all well and good, nobody is denying his being a constitutionalist, what is at question is why is he running as a Republican, he clearly is a Libertarian, and if you go to both the official Libertarian party and GOP web sites and compare the issues you will clearly see RP is Libertarian.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261744532</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261741888</link>
<description>What kind of drugs are you taking, the original poster, ME, decried nothing of the sort, those are your words. I decried somebody running for something they are not, he&amp;#039;s a Libertarian and should run as one, that&amp;#039;s the whole point! But the red thumb brigade cannot stand any criticism of their Messiah so they went off the hook on my comments. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261741888</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261723150</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s the kind of comment I would expect from a person that has a Messianic view of any particular politician.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261723150</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261722203</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not my own enemy, that&amp;#039;s for certain, I can sleep at night knowing I have integrity in everything I say and how I present myself publicly. Bring home our troops is an admirable goal, I don&amp;#039;t see your point. I don&amp;#039;t think removing them from everywhere outside of the U.S. as RP proposes makes sense in modern times with the current threats though, and surely not in the limited life span he has left. My comments are only disjointed and incoherent if you have a lack an understanding of the way the world works, which sounds like the case. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261722203</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul Claims Victory For The Cause Of Liberty</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261095901</link>
<description>So explain WW1, WW2(Europe), the Korean war. the Cold War? Should we have just sat back and watched as the world fell apart? And if you care to remember, we were attacked on 09/11/01, not the other way around. I&amp;#039;m not a big fan of the invasion of Iraq, and we should not be the police of the world, but we cannot put our heads in the sand either. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-claims-victory-for-the-cause-of-liberty/#IDComment261095901</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>