<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/565297</link>
		<description>Comments by VRWC</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Chaos for Glory: My Time With ACORN</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2009/09/10/chaos-for-glory/#IDComment34076486</link>
<description>Where do I sign up to donate to Mr. O&amp;#039;Keefe&amp;#039;s film making endeavors? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2009/09/10/chaos-for-glory/#IDComment34076486</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : The Republican Case for Gay Marriage</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mflynn/2009/06/10/the-republican-case-for-gay-marriage/#IDComment23936514</link>
<description>Whatever happened to Separation of Church and State? Why not put forth a law legalizing Civil Unions for same sex couples?Leave the church free to marry who they want while allowing EVERYONE the right to marry at City Hall.  If the Gay/Lesbian faction were smart, they would push for legalizing same sex civil unions and leave marriage alone.   The Gay lobby needs to concede that if and (sadly) when ANY marriage amendment is passed, it should allow churches a choice based on their doctrine. Finding a church to get married in will not be a problem, heck, most Episcopal, Unitarian and Methodist churches will marry a same sex couple.  Compulsory participation should not be required. The idea of coexisting peacefully is a nice one but it seems that conservative values are always the ones that are thrown aside for the sake of it... At some point we need to stand up for what is RIGHT and fair. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mflynn/2009/06/10/the-republican-case-for-gay-marriage/#IDComment23936514</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>