<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/304127</link>
		<description>Comments by VASGuy</description>
<item>
<title>MediaNama : Q309: Simputer Gets A New Lease Of Life? Geodesic Acquires Uruguay Software Co; Chandamama</title>
<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/02/223-q309-simputer-gets-a-new-lease-of-life-geodesic-acquires-uruguay-software-co-chandamama/#IDComment14740327</link>
<description>Google now offers individual profiled results , so this could very well happen that a keyword has different results for different users.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.medianama.com/2009/02/223-q309-simputer-gets-a-new-lease-of-life-geodesic-acquires-uruguay-software-co-chandamama/#IDComment14740327</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MediaNama : OnMobile Posts Net Profit of Rs 204.2 M; Content Costs Up 18.5%; 6 Apps On Developer Network</title>
<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/01/223-onmobile-posts-net-profit-of-rs-2042-mn-six-apps-on-developer-network/#IDComment14505303</link>
<description>Way to go ! Onmobile shining star of India&amp;#039;s VAS industry. No one can match them and create a worthwhile competition.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.medianama.com/2009/01/223-onmobile-posts-net-profit-of-rs-2042-mn-six-apps-on-developer-network/#IDComment14505303</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MediaNama : Netcores Comments On TRAIs Draft Recommendations On Mobile VAS</title>
<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/01/223-netcores-comments-on-trais-draft-recommendations-on-mobile-vas/#IDComment14383451</link>
<description>ISP is not forced to charge for your shopping on Amazon.com or take fee of your content download/access from internet.   Why should a VAS company given access to charge the subscribers at all  (as part of government license) ? If short code is a way to charge consumer,  why should it be forced on operator to open a short code?   I do not think anyone is stopping a consumer to dial a number and sending a SMS to a mobile number. Also no operator can stop what kind of SMS a user gets. So where is that illusive access missing today? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.medianama.com/2009/01/223-netcores-comments-on-trais-draft-recommendations-on-mobile-vas/#IDComment14383451</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MediaNama : Netcores Comments On TRAIs Draft Recommendations On Mobile VAS</title>
<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/01/223-netcores-comments-on-trais-draft-recommendations-on-mobile-vas/#IDComment14260677</link>
<description> Nowhere in world a regular does these kind of recommendations. Even in open markets like USA, regulator/government does not take call on application embedding .  This seems like a out of VAS business companies lobbying effort :))  Why will an operator allow some third party to get a revenue sucking machine plugged on to their prepaid customers? Just because he has a OSP license available for free. Sounds ridiculous on someone&amp;#039;s logic and expectations too.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.medianama.com/2009/01/223-netcores-comments-on-trais-draft-recommendations-on-mobile-vas/#IDComment14260677</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MediaNama : Netcores Comments On TRAIs Draft Recommendations On Mobile VAS</title>
<link>http://www.medianama.com/2009/01/223-netcores-comments-on-trais-draft-recommendations-on-mobile-vas/#IDComment14256782</link>
<description>What comments by others?  Netcore is not even a player who can comment on it. Did Onmobile submit its reply and their stand on it? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.medianama.com/2009/01/223-netcores-comments-on-trais-draft-recommendations-on-mobile-vas/#IDComment14256782</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>