<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/363427</link>
		<description>Comments by Usaq_Madik</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : FCC votes to begin crafting `net neutrality\&#039; rules</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BG8MT00#IDComment39958140</link>
<description>Thanks CyberCecil.  I can&amp;#039;t say I&amp;#039;m any less confused, but I appreciate your efforts.  If a company like Verizon can restrict access to stuff like SKYPE or other forms of VoIP or whatever else has the potential to come down the pike, forcing us to keep using their expensive landlines and/or cellular service, do we not want some sort of regulation in place that allows us the ability to use such services as they develop?   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BG8MT00#IDComment39958140</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : FCC votes to begin crafting `net neutrality\&#039; rules</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BG8MT00#IDComment39947982</link>
<description>Can someone enlighten me please?  Is the FCC attempting to limit the way the individual uses the Internet with these moves?  Or are they attempting to limit the way those who control &amp;quot;The Pipe&amp;quot; limit available bandwidth?  Would we not want some sort of regulation to prevent the latter?    If the FCC is only trying to do the latter and not attempting to curb the individual&amp;#039;s access to sites or their ability to write freely, why is this a bad thing?  Is the issue that we shouldn&amp;#039;t trust the FCC messing around at all with the Internet? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BG8MT00#IDComment39947982</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : LA\&#039;s top prosecutor vows to target pot shops</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BE9F2G0#IDComment39469003</link>
<description>I agree RE: smoking it rolled into a joint.  I&amp;#039;m always amazed people use those disgusting blunt wrappers.  You may as well smoke a cigar and inhale.  Nasty.     </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BE9F2G0#IDComment39469003</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : LA\&#039;s top prosecutor vows to target pot shops</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BE9F2G0#IDComment39440996</link>
<description>Obama is surely a douche looking to destroy America, but the marijuana issue was voted on and passed by the people of California long before he took office.  How&amp;#039;s that fact working out for you?  Go have a six-pack and some Marlboro Lights and cool off. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BE9F2G0#IDComment39440996</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : LA\&#039;s top prosecutor vows to target pot shops</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BE9F2G0#IDComment39435787</link>
<description>I know how many died bringing it to me.  Zero.  I grow my own.  Its a plant.  I don&amp;#039;t need a laboratory or some gang-banger to acquire it.  Just some seeds, soil, water and sunshine.  Ok Ok, so maybe I throw in a little love too.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BE9F2G0#IDComment39435787</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : LA\&#039;s top prosecutor vows to target pot shops</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BE9F2G0#IDComment39418767</link>
<description>Who is this &amp;quot;they&amp;quot; you keep referring to?  The tobacco industry?  The timber/cotton industry?  The oil industry?    Sterile?  Tell that to all of Bob Marley&amp;#039;s kids.  Or the plethora of welfare offspring who&amp;#039;s parents, one might speculate, smoke a ton of ganj.    10&amp;#039;s to 100&amp;#039;s of thousands die in the marijuana industry?  Substantiated by what data?  Even if this statistic of yours were accurate, legalizing would reduce dramatically if not entirely eliminate this number.  How many died during prohibition when the Mob ran booze?    I&amp;#039;m guessing you&amp;#039;re the kind of gal who thinks she doesn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;drink the kool-aid&amp;quot; and yet you&amp;#039;ve quaffed mightily from this batch I&amp;#039;m afraid.  I would have thought, based on your image, you support states rights and personal freedom.  Poser.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BE9F2G0#IDComment39418767</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Vancouver world\&#039;s easiest city to live in, Harare worst: poll</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.8c04ab2b483dc269437847af01eac2d0.641#IDComment23692561</link>
<description>BC Hydro is the best.  The petty crime and &amp;quot;gang wars&amp;quot; are really pretty cute if you&amp;#039;re from any American city that has real crime.  For Canadians it might be heavy stuff, but cmon...  BC rules.  Superhighway to Whistler is just making it that much better.  Agree with HatoyButch RE: The Cannucks.  Let&amp;#039;s go Rangers. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jun 2009 04:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.8c04ab2b483dc269437847af01eac2d0.641#IDComment23692561</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Somali pirates vow to hunt down, kill Americans</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97J00JG1#IDComment18787553</link>
<description>Bring it, skinnies.  Just remember, before your three pals got silenced a few days ago, they were also making statements about how they don&amp;#039;t fear America.  Now their heads come with air conditioning.  America&amp;#039;s gift to the world.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97J00JG1#IDComment18787553</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18743553</link>
<description>Yeah, its not like he has a movie with Robert Downey Jr. about to come out and another in post-production for a 2010 release.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18743553</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18743435</link>
<description>I can&amp;#039;t speak for libtards or kool-aid drinkers since I&amp;#039;m a Conservative who happens to enjoy blue humor and isn&amp;#039;t a bigot.  You can define Ignorance as you see fit, but my point stands.    Since you are obviously a genius, perhaps you can show me the error of my ways.  How exactly is Jamie Foxx a no-talent?  BTW, I&amp;#039;m curious...  Why is a brilliant mind such as yours leaving the C out of Black?  Also, the use of &amp;quot;Personally&amp;quot; in front of &amp;quot;I&amp;quot; is unnecessary.  You knew that though I&amp;#039;m sure. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18743435</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18743135</link>
<description>Certainly and if the posts here were as eloquent in their wording as you and were able to formulate a position without dragging their knuckles on the floor I doubt BrianC would have expressed such outrage. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18743135</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18743028</link>
<description>Nerd?   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18743028</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18742980</link>
<description>And hopefully he&amp;#039;ll turn that moment into a routine equally as brilliant as Pryor&amp;#039;s recounting of the free-basing incident. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18742980</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741891</link>
<description>You need to get your facts straight.  It wasn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;some rapper&amp;quot;, it was a Clear Channel DJ named Star (of Star and Buckwild).  He was fired immediately as he should have been.  Foxx&amp;#039;s joke about Cyrus isn&amp;#039;t even in the same league as what Star said about DJ Envy&amp;#039;s wife and kid.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741891</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741671</link>
<description>MC1135 is one of the few people making sense.     </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741671</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741628</link>
<description>The Obama girls are private citizens.  Miley Cyrus is a celebrity.  Funny that YOU would be the one to conjure up that vision and yet Jamie Foxx is the sick twisted freak... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741628</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741530</link>
<description>Who&amp;#039;s Rye Whiskey Joe?  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741530</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741454</link>
<description>We have laws against taking a bat to people too.  And pigs.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741454</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741374</link>
<description>Its really amazing how thin skinned and humorless the majority of posters here are.  The man was making a joke.  Off-color, tasteless, blue, low brow... whatever.  Get over yourselves you squares.  You&amp;#039;re all as bad as the woman who sued Miley because she made asian slanty eyes.  Do a quick Google Image search on Miley.  You might be surprised to see she isn&amp;#039;t the vestal virgin you hope she is.  You sanctimonious buffoons can yammer on all you want, but you know you spanked it to her Vanity Fair images anyway. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741374</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Jamie Foxx makes crude radio rant on Miley Cyrus</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741049</link>
<description>No talent?  The man won an Oscar, is a multi-platinum recording artist and a tremendous Stand-Up comedian.   He may have exhibited poor taste here, but calling him a no-talent is only exhibiting your ignorance.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97IC3TO0#IDComment18741049</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>