TinaSpeight

TinaSpeight

99p

1,575 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0

11 years ago @ Accountability - What would Margaret Th... · 0 replies · 0 points

Try (see below) what she thought in 2002!!! [posted abt 1030]

11 years ago @ Accountability - What would Margaret Th... · 0 replies · +3 points

"Mrs Thatcher would have seen through it eventually" - - - SHE DID --- see below for her later words on the subject from her 2002 book.

11 years ago @ Accountability - What would Margaret Th... · 1 reply · +1 points

SEE BELOW - HER latest views!

11 years ago @ Accountability - What would Margaret Th... · 2 replies · +23 points

Rather than speculate about Lady T:'s stance why not examine HER last word on the subject in 2002:---
"The doomsters’ favourite subject today is climate change. This has a number of attractions for them. First, the science is extremely obscure so they cannot easily be proved wrong. Second, we all have ideas about the weather: traditionally, the English on first acquaintance talk of little else. Third, since clearly no plan to alter climate could be considered on anything but a global scale, it provides a marvellous excuse for worldwide, supra-national socialism. All this suggests a degree of calculation. Yet perhaps that is to miss half the point. Rather, as it was said of Hamlet that there was method in his madness, so one feels that in the case of some of the gloomier alarmists there is a large amount of madness in their method

Margaret Thatcher Statecraft, HarperCollins 2002

11 years ago @ The Tory Diary - One in three Tory memb... · 0 replies · +1 points

Censor indeed, What I wanted to say might not have made pleasant reading to management!! They cannot take criticism it seems! The trouble is that only 266 people could be found who said that about the Blair heritage, for what that's worth . And who were they - ? Age? gender, location ? It seems that management goes on as before with a casual disregard to facts as I have pointed out on the newspaper blog

11 years ago @ The Tory Diary - One in three Tory memb... · 0 replies · +6 points

Censor indeed, What I wanted to say might not have made pleasant reading to management!! They cannot take criticism it seems! The trouble is that only 266 people could be found who said that about the Blair heritage, for what that's worth . And who were they - ? Age? gender, location ? It seems that management goes on as before with a casual disregard of facts.

11 years ago @ The Tory Diary - One in three Tory memb... · 0 replies · +4 points

The trouble is that only 266 people could be found who said that. And who were they - ? Age, gender, region???

11 years ago @ The Tory Diary - One in three Tory memb... · 1 reply · +2 points

Elaine - I feel certain that if the party goes into the election with Cameron as leader we are irretrievably lost. Agreed the disturbance of changing leadership now would be disruptive but the defeat in 2015 would be far less cataclysmic because the party would be speaking with one voice again.

11 years ago @ The Tory Diary - One in three Tory memb... · 0 replies · 0 points

Do read what she said! She =first wrote of the MPs' choice and the of the members!

11 years ago @ The Tory Diary - One in three Tory memb... · 10 replies · +15 points

Paul - I had hoped that with you as new editor ConHome would stop misleading people. The survey you carried out is not of Tory members and it would be UNTRUE to say it is. It is a absolutely chance collection of those from all parties and none who participate in this blog. You say that over half WERE PARTY MEMBERS. That is an astonishing improvement in presentation but it does mean that the number of members responding is pitifully low - 782 in fact and as we have no idea how many of these are from the Westminster village or other metro areas I would claim that the 1/3rd of these who think one thing is farcically low and totally meaningless. In fact I could argue that the results desired drove the analysis.

PLEASE DO NOT PERPETRATE THIS KIND OF FICTION ANY LONGER - it degrades ConHome