<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1216940</link>
		<description>Comments by Timmyaki</description>
<item>
<title>DoD Buzz : McChrystal: Going Or Chastened?</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/06/22/mcchrystal-going-or-just-chastened/#IDComment81468895</link>
<description>Maybe if the president responded to the gulf as fast as he responded to a little name calling McChryrstal would have a little more respect for him. Hmm 3 month wait for national emergency-The worse weve ever seen- and less than a week responds to a little insult.   NOBAMA </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/06/22/mcchrystal-going-or-just-chastened/#IDComment81468895</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : McChrystal Versus White House Flame War Gets Ugly; McChrystal Summoned to DC</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/22/mcchrystal-versus-white-house-flame-war-gets-ugly/#IDComment81463288</link>
<description>Haha! did u guys read the Rolling Stones article? It&amp;#039;s freaking hilarious I love this general! We should elect this guy president. I&amp;#039;d vote for him!  &amp;quot;Hey Charles&amp;quot; McChrystal asks&amp;quot;dos that job come with this?&amp;quot;  Middle finger  Puck the folititions! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/22/mcchrystal-versus-white-house-flame-war-gets-ugly/#IDComment81463288</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Afghan War Uncertain, So Are Minerals</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/06/21/afghan-war-uncertain-so-are-minerals/#IDComment81460365</link>
<description>I guess everyone forgot about 9/11 </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/06/21/afghan-war-uncertain-so-are-minerals/#IDComment81460365</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : New CYBERCOM Chief Says Military Has Zero Real Time Situational Awareness of Its Networks</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/03/new-cybercom-chief-speaks/#IDComment78412796</link>
<description>The U.S. puts way to much money into its tanks and needs to worry about it&amp;#039;s cybernetwork and cyberspace. It&amp;#039;s like putting up a brick wall to stop a bomb from falling. Build a bunker to protect yourself! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/03/new-cybercom-chief-speaks/#IDComment78412796</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Debating the Performance Characteristics of a Non-Existent Chinese 5th Gen Fighter</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/02/discussing-the-performance-characteristics-of-a-non-existent-chinese-5th-gen-fighter/#IDComment78412361</link>
<description>Eddy&amp;#039;s absolutely correct. Why would they invest all this time and money reaserching and developing, when overwhelming numbers will do the job? Eventually our jets will have to land and one of there one hundred jets will destroy it on the ground.  Reminder Korea- Not every Chinese had a weapon some were just there to block bullets..... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/02/discussing-the-performance-characteristics-of-a-non-existent-chinese-5th-gen-fighter/#IDComment78412361</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Debating the Performance Characteristics of a Non-Existent Chinese 5th Gen Fighter</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/02/discussing-the-performance-characteristics-of-a-non-existent-chinese-5th-gen-fighter/#IDComment78412094</link>
<description>China will never develop a real stealth fighter. Not becuase they cant, but because it&amp;#039;s not practical. Why would China try to produce one on one fighters versus our F-22&amp;#039;s or even our F-18&amp;#039;s? No they would never try to defeat us in one on one dogfights, they would simply build one hundred fighters for every F-22 or F-18. The simple strategy would be constantly have aircraft in the air and eventually our jets will have to land. Just like we did to the Germans with their tanks. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/06/02/discussing-the-performance-characteristics-of-a-non-existent-chinese-5th-gen-fighter/#IDComment78412094</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>