gdp's Comments

JetMag.com : Justin Bieber's Dreads: An Insult to Black Fans

Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:15:15 +0000

Perhaps the dumbest article I've ever had the misfortune to read. I am black and I am not remotely insulted by Bieber's dreads. The reason why is a little thing called learning. History tells us the origin of dreadlocks can be traced to multiple cultures over thousands of years. These include Jews, Ethiopians, Kenyans, Egyptians, Irish Picts, Ancient Greeks, Indian Yogis, Scots, Hindus, Tibetans. Mayans and maybe more. I am not offended by Bieber's dreads. I am exhausted it's even being discussed. Get a life, Jet, and do not presume to speak for all of Bieber's black fans.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:01:56 +0000

Mr Jackson did not 'sleep' with children in the sense you assume. He merely allowed them to be present in his private quarters and comforted them when they were upset. There was no sexual context.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Wed, 6 Jan 2010 03:02:36 +0000

Hi. Which thread do you suggest I post at - is there a newer one / do you mean the NAMBLA one?

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:54:21 +0000

Yes, sorry for confusion. Earlier log-in is one I have on Open Id site where my real name was 'already taken' made - so i used my middle name Posey. In my haste to answer you before you left - I entered my reply via that OpenID name. I look forward to your reply. Curious, though as to why you feel the need to label yourself conservative, liberal etc. Surely, like everyone else you have an opinion and are keen that opinion should accurately reflect what is true because it 'is ' true'- rather than because you believe or want it to be .

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:34:13 +0000

I'm not a 'fan' of anybody in particular - but I am a fan of justice and truth. Word search? Call it a late Xmas pressie.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:05:08 +0000

This 'blog' reveals nothing - but the bias of its author. Mr Jackson was completely innocent of the crimes he was accused of - and anyone informed knows this. As far as irrationalty goes, the insistence on Michael's guilt by his detractors in the face of: 1: No evidence being found on 16 computers after forensic examination for years by the FBI. 2: No physical evidence to support Jordan's description of Mr Jackson's genitalia was proved by physical examination - an examination, incidentally, that Mr Jackson volunteered to - to clear his name. 3: No factual substantiation of the supposed molestation by time, date or evidence of the 'victims.' 4: Evidence of gross deception and extortion being the motivation of 'the real' accusers - Evan Chandler and Janet Arviso. Accusations mean nothing. Proof is All. Produce it.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:02:36 +0000

The FBI files - if anyone cares to actually read them rather than just swallow the media summaries - totally exonerate Mr Jackson. Still unsure? Then cast your eyes over this serious journalist's review of the files. http://charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.com/2010... It's all there in black and white.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Tue, 5 Jan 2010 00:14:29 +0000

I stand by my comment regarding your 'contributions' to this post. But I am pleased to see you are keeping up with mine. You just might learn something after all. The word you're looking for? Research. Do some.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Mon, 4 Jan 2010 23:59:03 +0000

As usual Hanzo, you make no sense. None at all. If you put half as much effort in doing some proper research into the truth behind the lies and cruelty meted out to Mr Jackson - you'd be making a contribution. But maligning the name of someone who did more to help children than you could ever imagine is more your style isn't it? Repugnant.

Big Hollywood : Michael Jackson: NAMBLA Gets a Messiah

Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:22:42 +0000

The phrase ' Stay off my side' comes to mind. I don't welcome the presumption by NAMBLA about Michael's sexuality. There are many who knew Michael who report he was actually asexual. As far as irrationalty goes, the insistence on Michael's guilt by his detractors in the face of: - 1: No evidence of illicit material being found on the 16 computers taken from Mr Jackson's residence after comphrehensive forensic examination by the FBI. 2: No physical evidence to link Jordan's description of Mr Jackson's genitalia being overwhelmingly proved by physical examination of Mr Jackson. 3: No factual substantiation of the supposed molestations by time, date or other physical evidence by any of the so-called 'victims.' 4: Evidence of gross deception and extortion being the motivation of the profoundly non-credible real accusers behind the accusations of 1993 and 2003 - namely, Evan Chandler and Janet Arviso. ......defies all reason. Accusations mean nothing. Proof is irrefutable. Produce it.

Big Hollywood : Michael Jackson: NAMBLA Gets a Messiah

Sun, 3 Jan 2010 09:00:21 +0000

The phrase ' Stay off my side' comes to mind. I don't welcome the presumption of NAMBLA about Michael's sexuality - and there is a wealth of evidence to support the actuality that Mr Jackson was in fact asexual. He was also completely innocent of the crimes he was accused of, and anyone informed knows this. As far as irrationalty goes, the insistence on Michael's guilt by his detractors in the face of: 1: No evidence being found on 16 computers after comphrehensive forensic examination for years by the FBI. 2: No physical evidence to link Jordan's description of his genitalia was ever proved by examination of Michael Jackson - an examination incidentally that Mr Jackson volunteered for to clear his name. 3: No factual substantiation of the supposed molestation by time, date or evidence of the 'victims.' 4: Evidence of gross deception and extortion being the motivation of compromised and non-credible accusers - Evan Chandler and Janet Arviso. ........defies all reason. Accusations mean nothing. Proof is All. Produce it.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Sun, 3 Jan 2010 07:37:45 +0000

This 'blog' reveals nothing - but the bias of its author. Mr Jackson was/is completely innocent of the crimes he was accused of - and anyone informed knows this. As far as irrationalty goes, the insistence on Michael's guilt by his detractors in the face of: 1: No evidence being found on 16 computers after forensic examination for years by the FBI. 2: No physical evidence to support Jordan's description of Mr Jackson's genitalia was proved by physical examination - an examination, incidentally, that Mr Jackson volunteered for to clear his name. 3: No factual substantiation of the supposed molestation by time, date or evidence of the 'victims.' 4: Evidence of gross deception and extortion being the motivation of 'trash' accusers - Evan Chandler and Janet Arviso. That sound you hear? A gauntlet being thrown. Accusations mean nothing. Proof is All. Produce it.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Sat, 2 Jan 2010 23:18:53 +0000

This 'blog' reveals nothing - but the bias of its author. Mr Jackson was completely innocent of the crimes he was accused of, and anyone informed knows it. That sound you hear? A gauntlet being thrown. Bring out the evidence that proves Mr Jackson's guilt - those who say it exists. Lets see it. Because all I've heard so far is insults from teenagers and neo-conservative assumptions. Convince me I'm wrong. Ooohh...... silence?

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:51:06 +0000

This article lays out nothing - but the bias of its author. Mr Jackson was/is completely innocent of the ridiculous crimes alleged, and anyone sane or who has done the research knows it. See: http://charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.com/2009... This is a gauntlet call: Bring out your evidence those who say it exists and lets us all expose it to the light of day. There is nothing new in this 'piece' - even the exit line is old.

EbonyJet.com - Home : EBONYJET Music Page

Sat, 2 Jan 2010 09:39:03 +0000

There aren't the words Michael to tell you how we feel about you. There aren't enough ways to remember you the way you deserve to be remembered. There isn't enough love to show you how much we love you. .....But we'll spend the rest of our lives trying.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:20:31 +0000

Because I care. Because I care very much.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:40:40 +0000

This pathetic collection of smoke and mirrors, is the sum total of over 15 years of relentless harassment, intimidation and bullying inflicted on Mr Jackson - was paid for and carried out in the American taxpayer's name. As for Mr Shapiro's contention that the 'fans' uploaded claims about Jordan's supposed recantation. This should be disputed. The fan's would obviously like nothing more than a statement that would clear Mr Jackson's name once and for all - but the overwhelming majority want Jordan to do it under his own impetus. The 'fans' know, more than anyone apart from Michael's own family, that such a statement would need to be unequivocal and willingly given. It is far more likely that these false claims of Jordan's recantation were put up on the web by tabloid journalists, who in the wake of Jermaine Jackson's premature words, thought they would see if doing so would 'force' Jordan's hand. We cannot know for sure if the purpose of this piece is to mislead, but the fact that it does so extravagantly - is regrettable.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:38:27 +0000

An unsuprisingly light collection of such damning items as: 1 driver’s license, indecipherable pictures of a residence; 4 newspaper clippings — 2 of which are from tabloids, memos of an agent's travel plans, memos of meetings to discuss strategies, a statement of a train passenger with questionable cognitive skills and (thankfully) the results from the forensic scrubbing of the computer hard drives. These state of the art forensics, I might add - revealed precisely nothing. And the so-called young boy who alleged Michael Jackson engaged in phone-sex with him? Not so young, mid- 20's and it turns out - not so sane either. Exposed by Mr Mesereau in 2005 when our young 'stalker' took to the stand. It became clear he had an obsession with Michael Jackson and had made up the story, in order to meet his hero.

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:37:28 +0000

As for Raymond Chandler, his credibilty as a non-compromised source cannot be taken as anything but profoundly suspect. His latest book is riddled with subjective elaboration and obvious licence. Cut from the same cloth as Evan Chandler - a man who brutalized his own son for years and whose own sense of guilt and deserved estrangement from his family precipitated his recent suicide; Raymond Chandler's dubious quote rings curiously false in this 'article.' The FBI's involvement, wanted and needed by Sneddon to endorse his deeply personal years-long pursuit of Mr Jackson, did not result in them taking up Sneddon's invitation to become the primary investigaators of Mr Jackson. And what do the much-anticpated files reveal?

Big Hollywood : Hollywood and I: Both Wrong About Michael Jackson

Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:33:19 +0000

Science has a lot going for it. Its abiding mantra being: If something has not been proven to be so - it is not so. It has not been proven that Michael Jackson molest children. It has in fact, been proven to the satisfaction of a deeply conservative jury in republican Santa Barbara that not only were the charges of molestation baseless, but the minor misdemeanours of intent to intoxicate and conspiring to imprison - were also completely unfounded. Tom Sneddon clearly hoped if he threw 'enough mud' - something would stick. It did not. But the damage was done. Michael Jackson is not the first celebrity to be taken in by someone on his staff. Liars, thieves and con-artists always gravitate to money and position. Just ask Leonard Cohen and Sting - each stolen from by people they had known for years. As soon as Mr Jackson was informed of Mr Schaffel's past, he was out, and contrary to that asserted by Mr Shapiro - he did not return to Mr Jackson's employ.