<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/513892</link>
		<description>Comments by TheOtherDAW</description>
<item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Note: 100 Men Left on Base</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436565</link>
<description>Alright, then you&amp;#039;ve convinced me.  Let&amp;#039;s fire the sports psychologist. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436565</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Note: 100 Men Left on Base</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436249</link>
<description>Nothing wrong with shaking up the lineup, but let&amp;#039;s not panic about this team too much.  In the two series that we didn&amp;#039;t win, we gave Florida their only loss on the year, and we lost to a SD team that just also took 2 of 3 in Philly and is playing .700 ball.  Our SP isn&amp;#039;t completely right, we&amp;#039;ve somehow managed to leave 100 men on base, we&amp;#039;ve run into a couple clubs who have started off hot, yet we&amp;#039;re still 6-6.    Instead of firing or trading anyone, it seems like these guys need a good sports psychologist to help them relax in clutch situations - David in particular. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/20/note-100-men-left-on-base/#IDComment19436249</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>