<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/272073</link>
		<description>Comments by SusaNa</description>
<item>
<title>Change.gov : Change.gov: The Obama-Biden Transition Team | Join the Discussion: Healthcare</title>
<link>http://change.gov/page/content/discusshealthcare#IDComment11786940</link>
<description>It seems the most efficient, cost-effective solution will involve a single-payer. But there will be massive resistance to this kind of system. Will an intermediate step be maintaining the employer coverage but covering more people? What is most realistic for the near future? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://change.gov/page/content/discusshealthcare#IDComment11786940</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>