That's awesome, and everyone should go with what they have actually experienced, and not what they hear from anyone. But, from everything I have heard about him, and listening to his interviews, he does come across as a jerk. A sharp contrast to someone like The Rock, for instance.

I was never a fan of Hogan. Maybe that is because I became a fan in 1998, when Stone Cold Steve Austin brought me into wrestling. However, I am still excited that he is coming to WWE. There would be no WWE without Hulk Hogan.

It speaks for the awesomeness of the WWE Network that its monthly cost is less than the price of Kaitlyn's autograph. It is so incredibly frustrating that it will probably never be available in India.

Please. I am a fan of Cena, but 2009 was Orton's year, despite that terrible WM 25 booking decision. The main reason why 2009 got so refreshing was that Cena FINALLY had a rival who was portrayed as an equal to him. Someone who would actually defeat him on a regular basis, thus eliminating the extremely mundane predictability which his feuds can sometimes be found guilty of.

Leaving everything which Flair did aside, the one thing which was absolutely uncool of him was mocking Daniel Bryan and making him out to be someone who does not really belong on the A-list. It is especially sad, seeing how, in the 80s, Ric, for all his greatness, spent the decade playing second fiddle to a company whose owner had a fetish for roided-up huge men; and, in the later part of the 90s, Flair was constantly humiliated by his boss because of reasons very similar.

And, I am sure Harley Race would have loved Daniel Bryan, whatever Flair might say. He loved Bret, in the early 90s, and the average size of succssful WWE stars was much bigger than it is now.

Because I know nothing about this, can someone tell me the difference between a concussion and a stinger?

And...how is that relevant to the pops which all of them received? Good promos is only a factor in how over you become or how huge pops you get? This, without even going into how absolutely ridiculous your claim is that Austin's mic work was one-track and redundant. Not to mention highly ironical, since you praise Rock in the very next comment. Because Rock was all for diverse, versatile promo work, right?

And no, I am not turning it into an Austin-Rock flame war. I love both of them and their mic-work. But, promo is only a factor, not the picture. As long as you are getting huge pops, it is irrelevant how golden your mic work was/is. Ted Dibiase, Jake Roberts, Curt Hennig all had amazing promo ability, but their pops were nowhere close to in-his-prime Warrior or Hulk Hogan at all times. Jeff Hardy used to get huge pops without being great at promos. Brock got massive reactions even as a face without being a great promo. The Undertaker, Kane...I could go on and on. And there is absolutely no denying that Austin used to get unreal pops in his time. You had to actually sit back and shake with disbelief.

And, for the record, Bryan is probably the most over guy in the 'E right now, but to compare him with Austin and Rock right now is laughable. They are in a different universe, along with Hogan.

Amongst the many comments on Kane, congratulations on Steve Austin and the WWE. No WWE merchandise has sold as much as that T-Shirt, and I would be hard-pressed to think of a more iconic catchphrase. That was a legendary T-Shirt.

"I don't care if he was a "murderer" as you say, it just adds to his Crippler character."

I would say that this is the most sickening thing I have ever read on the internet, but unfortunately, that is not true. It is very, very close though. You might have been trolling, sir, but this was disgusting.

And no, I won't look at Thursday's ratings. When Raw could not even blow away the competition on Monday, then why would I go and look at the cable ratings of Thursday? Had it won Monday night, you would have had a point. But no, you do not.

Yeah, and Nitro was doing great numbers for cable show it was on as well. What happened to that?

Now, I know there were completely different circumstances which led to its demise. However, the point remains that simply comparing cable ratings of other shows to Raw proves nothing. And oh, Raw's rating was not 3.0. It was 2.92. Not 3.0. Also, I feel sad that you think just because the WWE is in no danger of losing tis TV spot right now, it should keep on making short-term decisions, and not look at the big picture.

Pretty sad say when you have to resort to the hundredth of a decimal point to show that Raw is doing "good". lol. Since you like being condescending, I will end this with observing how cute it is to see the things you come up with to defend the WWE, and how you think ALL of Raw drawing better than last year is fair, especially seeing that a) It has just been 5 months of this year, and you are comparing it with the whole of 2012; and b) For the most part, 2012 spotlighted the same person who is the main draw now. Really cute.

And I am not saying Punk draws better than Cena. He is not a bigger draw. John Cena is the fourth biggest draw in pro-wrestling history. Well, maybe the fifth-biggest draw, if you think Flair is 4th, and somehow people seem to underrate his drawing power. However, if you want to take random statistics and wave it in the face of others, then the TLC 2011 PPV, headlined by Punk, drew more buys than the TLC 2012 PPV, headlined by Cena.