en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/721851 Comments by Style http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment151107225 I'd say his suggestion that we're exchanging an \"honorable man\" for her is pretty cheap. Wed, 11 May 2011 20:41:45 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment151107225 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/back-to-school-ii/#IDComment151097380 I'm sorry - I can't support you and Atchison piling on Ignatieff like this. If his punditry was that useless, why did he keep doing it? Wed, 11 May 2011 20:08:51 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/back-to-school-ii/#IDComment151097380 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/back-to-school-ii/#IDComment151097348 I support MMP proportional representation to allocate federal seats by province. This is only surprising because you've made unfounded assumptions about my political beliefs. Wed, 11 May 2011 20:08:46 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/back-to-school-ii/#IDComment151097348 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/back-to-school-ii/#IDComment151096829 Yep. It's a set-back, but losing a job doesn't require you end your career. Wed, 11 May 2011 20:06:49 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/back-to-school-ii/#IDComment151096829 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/i-actually-don%e2%80%99t-know-quite-what-to-tell-these-folks/#IDComment151094181 No, out-manoeuvred means he was going door to door while his opponent was using the phone. Wed, 11 May 2011 19:58:07 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/i-actually-don%e2%80%99t-know-quite-what-to-tell-these-folks/#IDComment151094181 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/i-actually-don%e2%80%99t-know-quite-what-to-tell-these-folks/#IDComment151094172 I heard they wanted an opposition that got results for Canadians. Wed, 11 May 2011 19:58:04 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/i-actually-don%e2%80%99t-know-quite-what-to-tell-these-folks/#IDComment151094172 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150406533 Why do you need to apologise to angora? Are you afraid it's going to get you if you offend it? How deep does this angoraphobia run? No-one can help you until you admit you have a problem... Mon, 9 May 2011 20:53:02 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150406533 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150386914 You call that hyperbole? It was about as over the top as a burrowing ant's underarm sweat. My hyberbolic kung fu is mightier than your hyperbolic kung fu. Mon, 9 May 2011 19:34:16 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150386914 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-time-is-now/#IDComment150368567 Let's assume the leadership asks you to show up and make some noise in the House for some vote or other. Do you show up and make some noise and save your arguments with the leadership for a substantive policy issue dear to your heart or do you spend your political capital arguing against showing up and making noise? Question Period is a mess but it's not the most important mess the country needs to address. If you can do both, great. But let's be realistic - the news clips are still going to show QP and the two sides will still have to show their voters that they're in there fighting for them, or whatever slogan the parties use over the next four years. Mon, 9 May 2011 18:14:14 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-time-is-now/#IDComment150368567 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150367372 I agree with LKO, while these changes may or may not be good, Philippe Gohier is history's greatest monster. Mon, 9 May 2011 18:09:20 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150367372 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150366503 And link to our lunatic newsletter that nobody wants to read? Mon, 9 May 2011 18:05:37 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150366503 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150365220 Suggesting that Parliament is worse off because an "honorable man" has been replaced by M. Brosseau is sinking pretty low in the practice of partisanship. Mon, 9 May 2011 18:00:02 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150365220 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-time-is-now/#IDComment150364759 Please tell me the newly elected MPs will have loftier goals for change than "how the house works". If you need to let some asinine heckling continue so that you can strengthen pensions right away, or whatever your particular noble policy idea is, please know that you have my full support to let the house work as it is if that in any way helps you move public policy forward. Mon, 9 May 2011 17:58:05 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-time-is-now/#IDComment150364759 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150340369 This is going to create an existential crisis for some commenters. My whole Macleans commenting identity is based on one incredibly unpopular comment from a year ago...without the reputation points, what am I? Mon, 9 May 2011 16:17:50 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150340369 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150337102 Why is a cheap shot at the aspiring PM is "rank" while a cheap shot at a working mom is not? Mon, 9 May 2011 16:02:55 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150337102 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150330312 Because he just wrote an essay all about putting aside rank partisanship? Mon, 9 May 2011 15:33:09 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150330312 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150324184 "In the place of an honourable man who was falsely accused of “only visiting” we now have an MP that was elected without ever setting foot in the riding. " Glen Pearson, keeping it classy and non-partisan all the way. Mon, 9 May 2011 15:03:48 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150324184 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/if-its-thursday-this-campaign-must-be-in-jerse/#IDComment150315307 Great point! Other than the differences (the Conservatives have a majority, the NDP is the official opposition and the Bloc was nearly shut out in Quebec), it's exactly the same as before. Mon, 9 May 2011 14:23:26 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/if-its-thursday-this-campaign-must-be-in-jerse/#IDComment150315307 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/07/it-was-just-symbolic/#IDComment150051513 Why is M. Brosseau a less welcome or less qualified MP than her predecessor? Sun, 8 May 2011 15:25:11 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/07/it-was-just-symbolic/#IDComment150051513 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/07/the-search-for-simple-answers#IDComment150048273 Seems like sensible analysis - if the Liberals get a flawless leader, everything will be fine. Just to be doubly sure, they should get a unicorn as well. Sun, 8 May 2011 15:08:07 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/07/the-search-for-simple-answers#IDComment150048273