<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/617381</link>
		<description>Comments by Steve_Bradley</description>
<item>
<title>Human3rror : Ipseity Personal Branding Wordpress Theme</title>
<link>http://human3rror.com/ipseity-personal-branding-wordpress-theme/#IDComment35608520</link>
<description>Sporting the Ipseity theme over here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://DrSteveBradley.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://DrSteveBradley.com&lt;/a&gt;  Seems to be working great!  Will give you some link love on twitter as well.  Thanks John.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://human3rror.com/ipseity-personal-branding-wordpress-theme/#IDComment35608520</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : The Twitter Fallout: Managing the Un-Follow Armageddon and Creating a New Strategy</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/the-twitter-fallout-managing-the-un-follow-armageddon-and-creating-a-new-strategy/#IDComment31582787</link>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s the strategy I&amp;#039;ve been using of late...   I don&amp;#039;t auto-follow, but check my followers list every couple of days (get an average of 20-30 new followers a day).  I follow back all &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; people, i.e., those where a real person seems to be manning the ship.  If I know them or share a common interest with them I send them a personal DM as well (crafting it not to look like an auto-response DM).  I don&amp;#039;t follow back obvious bot or spammy looking accounts, but leave them be.   For porn or otherwise offensive followers, I block them - not sure if this helps to stem the tide of attracting others, but it at least gets my face off of their own twitter home page.  Have noticed that spammy / porn related followers come in waves - e.g., got about 40 of the same string of porn followers you show on Tony&amp;#039;s twitter home page the past couple of days.  Hoping that blocking them discourages other similar accounts from following.  Not sure if it actually works or not (anyone have a way to measure/verify this sort of thing?), but the waves do seem to subside once I&amp;#039;ve gone on a blocking spree... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/the-twitter-fallout-managing-the-un-follow-armageddon-and-creating-a-new-strategy/#IDComment31582787</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ChurchCrunch : My Personal Twitter Meltdown</title>
<link>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/08/21/my-personal-twitter-meltdown/#IDComment31508477</link>
<description>Dude, that&amp;#039;s a riveting video, btw ;-) I&amp;#039;ve never auto-followed back - but I do go in every couple of days and manually follow back every &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; follower...aka non-nekkid, non-forex trading, non-explode your follower count promising, non-guaranteed money making tip giving folks.  Also found that waiting a day or two to follow-back causes the really impatient spammers to drop off on their own...   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://churchcrunch.com/2009/08/21/my-personal-twitter-meltdown/#IDComment31508477</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>