<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/715478</link>
		<description>Comments by Steelers43</description>
<item>
<title>Defense Tech : Adios Global Hawk, U-2 Will Stick Around (updated)</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/25/adios-global-hawk-u-2-will-stick-around/#IDComment274101175</link>
<description>The RQ-4 can not do one very important thing that the RQ-170 can which is to linger steathily over hostile territory, a situation you would not want a human pilot in.      The RQ-4 is expendable because you don&amp;#039;t need an unmanned aircraft to fly the kind of missions it supports, lingering over non-hostile airspace, the U2 does those just fine and the U2 support structure is already in place and efficient.       Also, it seems that blimps can linger for much longer periods than the RQ-4 and at a much lower cost. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2012/01/25/adios-global-hawk-u-2-will-stick-around/#IDComment274101175</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : What&#039;s DEVGRU Building in There??</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/21/whats-devgru-building-in-there/#IDComment176001764</link>
<description>Maybe they need to rebuild that stealth helo they lost on the OBL raid? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/07/21/whats-devgru-building-in-there/#IDComment176001764</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Kit Up! DEV : IMINT: Tricked out Chinese Carbines</title>
<link>http://kitup.military.com/2011/07/imint-tricked-out-chinese-carbines.html#IDComment170777884</link>
<description>Can you imagine going into battle with a rifle that says made in China on it? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jul 2011 20:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://kitup.military.com/2011/07/imint-tricked-out-chinese-carbines.html#IDComment170777884</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love China&#039;s Carrier Killing Missile</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/30/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-chinas-carrier-killing-missile/#IDComment64897303</link>
<description>Does the US really need ASBM technology? Are there that many fleet/carrier threats to the US that would make ASBM&amp;#039;s more effective than known technology/ships that the US already possesses?  I do not think so.... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/30/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-chinas-carrier-killing-missile/#IDComment64897303</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : All Raucous On Cyber War Front</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/29/all-raucous-on-cyber-war-front/#IDComment64662075</link>
<description>I like the picture of the servers.  Is that in response to the commenter who teased about the graphics that look like they are from the 90&amp;#039;s for cyber war articles?  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/29/all-raucous-on-cyber-war-front/#IDComment64662075</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Cyber Hackers Target UK</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/23/uk-under-cyber-attack/#IDComment63708590</link>
<description>Yeah but, would a picture of a guy sitting at a computer be any more exciting? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/23/uk-under-cyber-attack/#IDComment63708590</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/15/f-16-sale-to-taiwan-would-it-make-a-difference/#IDComment62418644</link>
<description>Which is why  now might be the best time for the Chinese to try to take Taiwan? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/15/f-16-sale-to-taiwan-would-it-make-a-difference/#IDComment62418644</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : South of the Border Mayhem</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/15/south-of-the-border-mayhem/#IDComment62413388</link>
<description>I think the problem with legalizing and regulating is that the Cartels will just transition to legal producing and will still control the drug markets with violence.  What incentive would they have to change their ways of doing business, the law is already useless. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/15/south-of-the-border-mayhem/#IDComment62413388</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Chinese Digi-Camo</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/10/chinese-digi-camo/#IDComment61285440</link>
<description>Now the communist leaders can roll over their dissidents in style. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/03/10/chinese-digi-camo/#IDComment61285440</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Gimme Some Skin!</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/05/gimme-some-skin/#IDComment50663326</link>
<description>Spoken like Dwight Shrute. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/05/gimme-some-skin/#IDComment50663326</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Banging Trons in The Stan</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/05/banging-trons-in-the-stan/#IDComment50522693</link>
<description>Great post.    I saw pictures of a prowler launching recently to be flown over the Stan&amp;#039; and I couldn&amp;#039;t figure out exactly what they were needed for other than for sigint, but I figured UAV&amp;#039;s could do that at a lot less cost.   Way to read between the lines. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/05/banging-trons-in-the-stan/#IDComment50522693</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Zapping Drones from a Truck</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/19/zapping-drones-from-a-truck/#IDComment43973838</link>
<description>This would be a big hit at the radio control airfield near my house. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2009/11/19/zapping-drones-from-a-truck/#IDComment43973838</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>