Steelers43
59p12 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0
12 years ago @ Defense Tech - Adios Global Hawk, U-2... · 1 reply · +5 points
The RQ-4 is expendable because you don't need an unmanned aircraft to fly the kind of missions it supports, lingering over non-hostile airspace, the U2 does those just fine and the U2 support structure is already in place and efficient.
Also, it seems that blimps can linger for much longer periods than the RQ-4 and at a much lower cost.
12 years ago @ Defense Tech - What's DEVGRU Building... · 1 reply · 0 points
12 years ago @ Kit Up! DEV - IMINT: Tricked out Chi... · 5 replies · +16 points
14 years ago @ Defense Tech - How I Learned to Stop ... · 2 replies · +1 points
14 years ago @ Defense Tech - All Raucous On Cyber W... · 3 replies · +1 points
14 years ago @ Defense Tech - Cyber Hackers Target UK · 0 replies · +2 points
14 years ago @ Defense Tech - F-16 Sale to Taiwan, W... · 0 replies · +1 points
14 years ago @ Defense Tech - South of the Border Ma... · 2 replies · +2 points
14 years ago @ Defense Tech - Chinese Digi-Camo · 0 replies · 0 points
14 years ago @ Defense Tech - Gimme Some Skin! · 0 replies · +1 points